03/29/2024
“Because the word ‘harvest’ is already widely used and understood to include hunting in Maine, the plain language of the amendment unambiguously affirms a right to hunt for the limited purposes of ‘nourishment, sustenance, bodily health and well-being’ by including the ‘right to … harvest’ food,” the justices wrote.
::
The right to hunt has been affirmed by the Law Court as part of the Right to Food amendment, just as we meant when we wrote the language, but the right to hunt can still be regulated, just as we told supporters and opponents of the amendment.
Unambiguous.
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court disagrees with a Readfield couple who argued that the ban contradicts a 'right to food' amendment voters approved in 2021.