02/17/2026
Watch the recording of last week’s webinar "Dismantling the Bench: Firings, Fear, and the Future of Immigration Justice" sponsored jointly by the ABA Section of Civil Rights and Social Justice and the COI: https://www.youtube.com/live/1n2BzBc9WEo
The American Bar Association has long called for the immigration court system to be moved from the Department of Justice to an independent Article I court to enhance independence from the executive branch. Recent firings of seasoned immigration judges, particularly those with prior experience representing immigrants, have raised serious concerns about the erosion of judicial independence and the integrity of our immigration court system.
According to news reports, approximately 100 immigration judges have been terminated, with some removals occurring abruptly and without any explanation — at a time when the immigration court backlog is at historic highs, exceeding three million pending cases. The COI has tracked data from the Executive Office for Immigration Review’s website at different points in time and it shows that in November 2024 there were 729 immigration judges, and on February 13, 2026, there were 523. These numbers reflect not only firings but also resignations and retirements, as well as some new hires. While the ABA cannot independently confirm this information, it was generated from government sources and demonstrates a concerning trend of significantly fewer immigration judges at a time of increased enforcement actions.
The webinar explored how these dismissals — often without clear justification — are affecting due process for immigrants and asylum seekers while undermining public trust in the courts. Viewers heard directly from former immigration judges and policy experts about the consequences of replacing experienced adjudicators with temporary military judges and hiring additional adjudicators who have been recruited as “deportation judges.” With a backlog of over 3 million cases and rising enforcement actions, the stakes for fairness and functionality in immigration proceedings have never been higher.
Panelists examined the legal, procedural, and human impacts of these changes, and what they signal for the future of immigration adjudication in the U.S. Watch this timely conversation on threats to the rule of law and concerns over ensuring that our immigration courts remain independent, impartial, and just.
Speakers:
💠 Karen Grisez – former Chair and Member, ABA Commission on Immigration
💠 Jeremiah Johnson – Vice President of the National Association of Immigration Judges (NAIJ); former Immigration Judge
💠 Kerry E. Doyle – Partner, Green and Spiegel LLC; former Immigration Judge
Moderator:
💠 Homero López, Jr. – Legal Director, Immigration Services & Legal Advocacy and Member, Commission on Immigration Advisory Committee
Watch the webinar recording in the link below!
Joint Sponsor: ABA Commission on ImmigrationThe American Bar Association has long called for the immigration court system to be moved from the Department of ...