07/31/2025
Trying reallllly hard here to separate my deep, deep disgust with anything related to the current Occupant from objective reality. And the reality is that yes, the White House is too small for hosting the many diplomatic events that take place there. HM the King can host upwards of 300 guests for dinner in a ballroom in Buckingham Palace (please check my math, Kris Hurd!) and who knows how many guests fit into a ballroom at the Kremlin or the Elysee Palace in Paris. So yes, many Presidents and First Ladies have used tents of various sizes set up on the South Lawn. And while they are always beautifully decorated with flowers and candles, gorgeous table covers, china and crystal, you are still aware that you have left the White House itself, which is a bit sad, isn't it?
So, an enormous ballroom, paid for by private funds, on its surface is not such a crazy idea. BUT. What will happen to those who traditionally work out of the East Wing, like the Visitors Office I had the honor of leading, and the First Lady's social office on the second floor? It's one thing to say they will temporarily move out during construction, it's quite another to see what the plan is for them once the ballroom is built. Maybe on a floor above?
I look forward to seeing the plans for this construction and hope with all my being it will not be decked out in Trumpian gold everywhere! And I guess it will sadly be unavoidable to name it after him, although so far they are saying "State Ballroom," and that's perfectly fine. It's sometimes difficult for those of us with a deep connection to the House, who love it and it's history, to remember that it is, in fact, a living House, and so it's not all that strange for it to occasionally change.
The project to construct a massive ballroom fulfills a wish for Trump, who has long disliked the tent pitched on the lawn to accommodate large-scale events.