08/17/2022
Clarification to Mayor's comments during 8/15 council meeting and reported in media:
Clarification:
If it's true that there were no hazardous materials in the building, why did city personnel report in early to mid December in the media that there WAS asbestos, lead and mold in the building? According to an open records request, the asbestos test report is dated January 5, 2022 and reported no asbestos containing materials after the city reported they were present.
The open records request also indicated that lead and mold testing are not required for a demolition permit. Since the lead and mold test reports were not provided, is it safe to assume that lead and mold testing was not performed? Again, why did the city report they were present in the building. Lead is a hazardous material worthy of proper abatement according to the EPA.
Lastly, the demolition permit does not offer a place to indicate hazardous materials (present or absent) and apparently, lead testing is not required by the City of Smyrna per the open records request but lead remains a hazardous material per EPA. A demo permit does not automatically mean that no hazardous materials existed. Abatement is necessary for lead too.
Mayor's words:
“And our staff is also being accused of putting citizens at risk because of hazardous materials during the demolition. To me, this just goes to show that just because it’s on social media doesn’t mean it’s true and you should believe it. We satisfied every requirement when we pulled the demolition permit in January. And it’s right here in my hand. There was no asbestos present and every other requirement was met. There was no danger to anyone — period.”