Label GMO's Sacramento

Label GMO's Sacramento It has been proven that people will avoid purchasing products they know to be genetically modified. We believe it's our right to KNOW.

That is the real reason global food and chemical companies oppose honest labels. Labeling GMOs does not hurt local farmers or cause frivolous lawsuits. Sixty one countries including Japan, Australia and the European Union either require labeling or ban GMOs. We, in the US, have 70% of our food supply containing GMOs, and most people are not aware of this. Get to know what you're eating and the DAN

GERS of GMOs. People of the greater Sacramento region are invited to get involved with reclaiming their FREEDOM to know what's in their FOOD.

09/07/2026

Two continents just put the chemicals on the label. We didn't.

Last month, on July 31, a law took effect across the European Union. The next day, August 1, Canada's version took effect too.

Both now require the same thing: 56 fragrance chemicals that used to hide inside one word have to be printed on the label by name. That brings the list from 24 to more than 80.

Here's the part that matters to us.

They made no exception for natural. Menthol. Vanillin. Camphor. Eucalyptus oil. Rose oil. Jasmine oil. Essential oils got their own entries on the list.

Nobody asked where the chemical came from. They asked what it does to people.

Meanwhile, in the United States, all of it is still one word. Fragrance. One ingredient or two hundred, you can't tell, and you're not meant to.

A woman in Toronto can now read a label and make a decision.

A woman in Ohio is still guessing.

Find fragrance free, essential oil free products at FragranceFreeNation.com.

Please share. Consumers cannot make informed choices about ingredients they are never told are there. Europe and Canada decided people deserved more information. The United States can too.

Sources in the comments.

Sources:

EU: Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545.

Canada: Cosmetic Regulations SOR/2024/63 and Health Canada cosmetic labelling guidance.

The new rules require listed fragrance allergens above 0.001% in leave on cosmetics or 0.01% in rinse off cosmetics. They do not require disclosure of the entire fragrance formula and apply to cosmetics, not cleaning or laundry products.

08/23/2026
08/15/2026

After sharing the disturbing new research linking Roundup exposure during pregnancy to premature birth, I want to remind everyone that we could dramatically reduce our exposure just by ending the completely unnecessary practice of spraying Roundup on food crops right before harvest.

In Europe, spraying Roundup directly on food crops to dry them right before harvest has been BANNED.

In the U.S. it’s allowed on 70+ crops and accounts for over half the glyphosate in our diet.

Roundup isn’t just glyphosate…it contains other ingredients shown to be MORE toxic than glyphosate itself. The EU banned one of those ingredients back in 2016, while the U.S. still allows it.

Please share this. Why should Americans be exposed to Roundup at such an alarming rate, while other countries have already taken steps to protect their citizens?

08/05/2026

Gmo injections and fetal deaths …..

A Map to show where Pesticides are applied
07/24/2026

A Map to show where Pesticides are applied

A new locally developed website is making pesticide-use records in California’s forests easier to explore. SprayMapCA combines state, county, and federal data in an interactive map, including nearly 4,000 mapped records for Plumas County.

07/15/2026
07/13/2026

She was a shy, introverted shrimper from a tiny Texas town most people have never heard of — fewer than fifteen hundred souls on the Gulf Coast. She had five kids and a fish house and no money, no lawyers, no power of any kind. And she decided to take on one of the largest chemical companies on earth. Thirty years later, she won the biggest victory of its kind in American history...

Her name is Diane Wilson.

She was born in Seadrift, Texas, in 1948 — a fourth-generation shrimper whose family had worked the same stretch of Gulf coast for a hundred and thirty years. The bays were in her blood. Sh*****ng was all she'd ever known, and all she'd ever wanted. She describes herself, even now, as a natural introvert — not a speaker, not a crowd-gatherer, not anyone's idea of a firebrand.

But by the late 1980s, something was terribly wrong with the water she loved.

The shrimp catches were collapsing. The fish were coming up with sores and deformities. A fine white plastic powder dusted the cars, the swimming pools, and the leaves of the trees all over town. And nobody was talking about it — because the company whose plant sat across the bay, the Taiwanese petrochemical giant Formosa Plastics, was one of the biggest employers in the entire county.

Then, in 1989, a fellow shrimper walked into Diane's fish house and tossed a newspaper article onto the counter.

The EPA had just released, for the very first time, its data on toxic emissions — and the Associated Press had ranked every county in America. Calhoun County, Texas, the little coastal county where Diane Wilson had lived her whole life, was ranked number one in the nation. The most toxic county in the United States.

She had never heard a word about it. And so this shy, introverted shrimper did something completely out of character. She called a public meeting.

All hell broke loose.

The town turned on her almost overnight. Bank presidents drove down to her fish house to tell her to stop. Senators' aides called. Fellow shrimpers stopped speaking to her. Her marriage fell apart. Her kids were targeted at school. Formosa was the money in that county, and Diane Wilson had just declared war on it — with nothing but her own stubbornness to fight with.

She did not stop. Not then. Not for the next thirty years.

When Formosa sought permits to expand its plant, and the EPA declined to require a full environmental study, Diane had no lawyers and no leverage. So she used the only thing she had. She tied her shrimp boat to a dock, climbed aboard, and stopped eating. The hunger strike lasted about two weeks, with almost no one paying attention — except a Formosa executive who kept driving down to tell her she was being a foolish woman and to please give up. She didn't. And the EPA reversed itself and ordered the study.

In 1994, she pressured Formosa into signing a "zero-discharge" agreement — a formal promise to stop dumping waste into the bay. Formosa, by every later measurement, broke that promise.

So Diane Wilson took her own shrimp boat — her livelihood, her family's trade for a century — out into the bay, and she sank it. Her reasoning was simple and unshakable: if the company was going to keep poisoning the water, she would not keep working it.

Over the years, she was arrested roughly twenty times. She once scaled a chemical-plant smokestack in protest and served three months in jail. Through it all, she kept collecting evidence, kept documenting, kept refusing to look away.

And then, around 2012, a former Formosa worker reached out.

He was so afraid of being seen that he met her in a field sixty miles from town. He told her the company was still violating its zero-discharge agreement, constantly — and was manipulating its own internal reports to hide it. Over the next few years, more former workers came forward. Shift supervisors. Managers. They slipped her documents.

They pointed her toward the plant's dirtiest secret: nurdles.

Nurdles are the tiny raw plastic pellets — translucent, lentil-sized, about the size and shape of a fish egg — that all plastic products are made from. Formosa's plant produces more than a trillion of them a day. They aren't legally allowed to be discharged into the water at all. But according to the workers, staggering quantities were washing out of the plant's wastewater outfalls and into the bays and creeks Diane had fished her whole life.

So, at an age when most people are winding down, Diane Wilson got into a kayak.

For about four years, she and a small team of volunteers paddled and waded up the industrial canals draining the Formosa plant, collecting pellets, photographing them, logging GPS coordinates. The nurdles were everywhere — embedded in the mud banks, tangled in plant roots, washed in tidal layers up the canals for miles. One collaborator watched, stunned, as she scooped up thousands of pellets in minutes from a spot where he'd have expected a handful.

By the time they were finished, they had collected more than forty million individual plastic pellets, taken over seven thousand photos and videos, and documented some twenty-four hundred sampling sites.

In 2017, Diane Wilson sued Formosa Plastics in federal court. She borrowed a horse trailer to haul the mountain of evidence to the courthouse in Victoria, Texas — and at one point parked it outside and brought the judge out to see it for himself.

In 2019, Judge Kenneth Hoyt ruled in her favor. He found that Formosa had violated the Clean Water Act on what he called an "extensive, historical, and repetitive" basis. He called the company a "serial offender."

That December, the case settled — for fifty million dollars.

It was the largest sum a private citizen had ever won under the Clean Water Act in the history of the United States. A shy shrimper from a town of fewer than fifteen hundred people had beaten one of the largest chemical companies on the planet. And Formosa would go on to spend many millions more to finally bring the plant into compliance.

And here is the part that tells you exactly who Diane Wilson is.

She refused to take a single dollar of that settlement for herself.

Every penny went into a trust — money that has since funded shoreline restoration, a fishing cooperative to help revive her community's way of life, a citizen-science program to track plastic pollution, environmental education in local schools, and a coastal park. When she won the Goldman Environmental Prize in 2023 — the "Green Nobel," the highest honor in grassroots environmentalism — it came with a check for two hundred thousand dollars. She handed that straight to her nonprofit, too.

She still hasn't stopped. Now in her late seventies, Diane Wilson has turned her attention to another chemical plant near Seadrift, documenting the same kind of plastic pollution — and in December 2025, her organization filed formal notice to take it to court as well.

As she once explained what drives her, in the plainest words imaginable: "That bay is alive. She is family, and I will fight for her."

She is seventy-seven years old. And she is still out there on the water.

Had you ever heard of Diane Wilson? Tell us below — and share her story, because more people should know it. And here's one worth sitting with today: have you ever seen one ordinary, stubborn person refuse to give up, and change something everyone said couldn't be changed? Tell us about them.

Address

Sacramento, CA

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Label GMO's Sacramento posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Label GMO's Sacramento:

Shortcuts

Share