03/15/2021
Weekly recap from 03/13/21 meeting
Hello all,
For this past reading meeting we started Du Bois's Coming of the Lord chapter in Black Reconstruction, where he discusses "how the Negro became free because the North could not win the war if he remained in slavery. And how arms in his hands, and the prospect of arms in a million more black hands, brought peace and emancipation to America''.
We discussed the relationship of blacks to the army, the contradiction of peace and the hypocrisy of the North and racism of the South. We discussed the "international situation" of England and France and the economic, psychological and political effect of Lincoln freeing the slaves.
Thus there were these variety of forces dealing with the freedom of slaves because the country is developing economically and politically in the world, which is a question of trade and capital and, as a country internally, which is dealing with the political and economic disposition of people and their relation to slavery and work: "The failure or success of the war hung by a thread. If England and France should recognize the Confederacy, there was little doubt that the Union cause would be beaten; and they were disposed to recognize it. Or did Lincoln realize that since a draft law was needed to make unwilling Northern soldiers fight, black soldiers were the last refuge of the Union?"
Further, Lincoln noted that the emancipation of slaves would "….weaken the Rebels by drawing off their labours".
With this developing in the historic moment of the late 19th century where the slaves were free, and thus these forces of people continued to develop from that point that would be the freedom struggle of the 20th century, Du Bois writes; "Emancipation had thus two ulterior objects. It was designed to make the replacement of unwilling Northern white soldiers with black soldiers; and it sought to put behind the war a new push toward Northern victory by the mighty impact of a great moral ideal both in the North and in Europe".
What does it mean to free the slaves? For the labouring class of Europe they "hailed the actions of Lincoln'' alongside having hundreds of meetings in the industrial sections of Europe. Even philosopher John Stuart Mill declared that: "Higher political and social freedom has been established in the United States". Du Bois continues and writes; "Karl Marx testified that this meeting held in 1863 kept Lord Palmerston from declaring war against the United States".
In the South, the freedom of slaves meant adequate numbers to fight though against the North, as well as supplying their armies with food and goods. Though the blacks fighting in the front lines weren't considered legitimate, even guffawed at in the House of Representatives they had to be used because the South was not receiving white fighters from the government or by the ambitions of the white working class themselves. For the North, the freedom of slaves meant the era of progress was upon the cities and capital.
Though we didn't finish the chapter in the meeting, we did get ahead of ourselves and discussed the striving of man, as well as what it means to become a man from being a slave. We read through the responses of emancipation of the free blacks, embodied by Frederick Douglass; "Abolish slavery tomorrow and not a sentance or syllable of the Constitution need be altered. It was purposefully so framed as to give no claim no sanction to the claim of property in man… the opportunity is given us to be men. With one courageous resolution we may blot out the handwriting of ages against us.. there is no power on the earth or under the earth which can deny that the black man has earned the right of citizenship in the United States."
Talk soon!
Serafina
Web Du Bois and James Baldwin Reading Collective