09/26/2022
Did you see this Op Ed in the Point Reyes Light by Supervisor Dennis Rodoni and William Barrett? It's a great explanation for why Measure O makes sense for Inverness:
PERSPECTIVE: Inverness residents should learn from history and Vote Yes on Measure O
Measure O provides funds to be administered by the Inverness Public Utility District (IPUD) for the development of a wildfire mitigation plan and essential community-wide fire safety programs like home hardening and fuel reduction. Measure O is supported by Congressman Jared Huffman, State Assemblyman Mark Levine and County Supervisor Dennis Rodoni. Although the Inverness Association has no position on Measure O, Measure O is supported by present and former Inverness Association Board Members Bridger Mitchell, William Barrett, Mike Durrie, Bob Johnston, and Jerry Meral.
27 years ago, the Vision fire burned over 12,000 acres and 45 homes along Drakes View Drive. Two years ago, the Woodard Valley fire burned 5,000 acres at the Seashore. Can you imagine the damage if that lightning strike had landed in our immediate neighborhood? Can we, as a community, honestly say we have done everything possible to protect ourselves from the devastating impact of another wildfire?
Calfire has designated Inverness as a High Fire Risk Area and yet even as the wildfire danger increases each year the only tangible response by our community has been some individual home hardening and the recent creation of a small shaded fuel break paid for privately by concerned neighbors in Seahaven.
Inverness history includes earlier examples of looking away from difficult problems. In 1948 – 1950 a dangerously inadequate water system led locals to place a $50,000 bond measure initiative on the ballot to buy and improve the water company. Three times it failed to get support, once by a single vote. Thirty years went by until Inverness voters took responsibility for the water system, passing a bond measure that provided up to $750,000 for the same purpose.
Looking away didn’t solve the problem and certainly increased the cost. Let’s learn from our own history and take action to address our wildfire risk now.
There appear to be three principal objections and misconceptions when it comes to Measure O. The first is the idea that Marin Wildfire Prevention Authority will take care of the problem for us. After all, we are already paying a fire tax, so let’s just wait for MWPA to come to our rescue. This is completely unrealistic. The need in Inverness for wildfire mitigation measures greatly exceeds the amount of funding and support we will receive from MWPA.
The second misconception is that IPUD is opposed to Measure O. Understandably the IPUD Board and staff have expressed concern about taking on responsibility for wildfire mitigation, but IPUD is the logical organization to oversee a community-wide effort and coordinate with county, state and federal wildfire resources. And, although the IPUD Board chose not to actively endorse Measure O, instead leaving it to voters to decide, they have strongly stated their intent to implement Measure O funds as efficiently and effectively as possible if it passes.
The third misconception is that voters shouldn’t vote for Measure O until IPUD develops a detailed plan for how the money will be used. Once again, this is unrealistic. IPUD does not have the staff or budget to develop a wildfire mitigation plan, unless we provide the funds for them to do so. And Measure O specifies that 95% of the funds raised will go to fire mitigation programs and water supply improvement, not overhead.
Measure O programs include:
● Removal of dead trees
● Matching grants to homeowners to create defensible space and harden homes
● Replacement of IPUD’s remaining flammable wooden water tanks
● Matching grants to homeowners to install water efficient appliances and tanks to conserve rainwater, lessening water demand during fire season
●Creation of shaded fuel breaks in Inverness and along our borders in partnership with the Seashore and Tomales Bay State Park
Congressman Huffman has stated that passage of Measure O will help him press the National Park Service for more fuel reduction measures within the Seashore. And Assembly Member Levine, a recent candidate for Insurance Commissioner, has urged passage of Measure O as a sign of community responsibility that will be recognized by home insurance companies as they set rates and decide whether to provide coverage.
Many homeowner policies in Inverness have already been cancelled due to fire risk. The State Insurance Commissioner has said that in order to maintain access to fire insurance, communities must meet certain criteria, including a “risk assessment in consultation with the local fire district or state agency” and “clear funding sources to implement community mitigation activities and meet clear risk reduction goals”.
Doing nothing in the face of a huge increase in fire danger is clearly not a good risk reduction strategy. IPUD is a well-run and competent organization. Let’s give them the funding they need to expand their role and take on the challenge of wildfire mitigation.
Please act now to make your property and your loved ones safer: Vote Yes on Measure O.