06/10/2026
I wish I could say this "saga" was over but it appears it is the gift that keeps on giving! I don't understand why we can't just work hard and get the people's business done! That is what we were elected to do. Some elected and/or hired officials (apparently) don't see it that way! Gaslighting and "Jockeying" for position seems to be more important to them. I don't have time for that nonsense, which is why you don't hear from me on Facebook posts that often. My joy comes from delivering what people are asking for. I am your servant! If you have questions you can always contact me by phone, text or email. That information is all on the county website! Please read commissioner Mansfield's reporting and also my statement on this post. The truth will set you free!
News Channel 2 ran a story ( https://tinyurl.com/2fz6r33m ) on the delays surrounding the Historic Latimer (Brown) Home, and County Mayor John Isbell and Director of Schools Scott Langford were each given space to respond. Let's set the record straight about this story, because it is quite the whopper, filled with partially accurate information presented in a grossly inaccurate manner. What these officials told the news does not match the record. So here is the truth, plainly, for the hardworking taxpayers of Sumner County who are owed it.
Make no mistake. This historic home has sat at the center of repeated misrepresentations, political gamesmanship, obfuscation, backroom deals, and the mishandling of money that was never theirs to redirect. Here is the documented reality.
1. $500,000 left by Mr. Brown for the home was wrongfully diverted. That money was given for one purpose, the historic preservation of the home. Instead, it was wrongfully taken and commingled with other funds, where it lawfully was never supposed to be.
2. The home's own money was then leveraged to fund a park that EXCLUDED the home. That same $500,000 intended for the Historic Latimer (Brown) Home was combined with $125,000 in taxpayer money to secure a $625,000 state grant for Langford's park that excluded the home. This was not simply a bait and switch. The grant's own documentation drew a boundary line around the historic home to EXCLUDE it, guaranteeing that not one dollar of that funding could ever be used to restore or preserve the very structure Mr. Brown's gift was meant for. Their own application drew the line. The intent is not a matter of opinion when it is written into the document. The Brown House was excluded from the TDEC-funded park improvement scope, and the recorded protected boundary excluded the house and 0.17 acres around it.
3. This was never about preserving history. The money was meant for the home, not a park, and the paperwork shows they understood that. Today the real cost of Langford's park would exceed $2 million, and still not one dollar has gone toward restoring the historic home.
For two years, Scott Langford and John Isbell misled the public and blocked the rightful return of these funds to the County. The County did not get the money back until late spring of 2025. Then our General Operations and Ad Hoc Committees came up with a plan with a scope, a budget, a timeline, an architect, a contractor, a defined public use, a stewardship organization, a site plan, a floor plan, and a rendering of the finished home. And for over a year since, Mayor Isbell and Director Langford have worked behind the scenes, with cooperating commissioners and county employees, to obfuscate this project as much as possible and stall it as long as possible.
------
Now to their statements to News Channel 2.
They falsely claim I cost taxpayers a $625,000 grant. Here is the plain truth. They wrongfully confiscated the $500,000 that Mr. Brown left expressly for the home, combined it with $125,000 of your tax money, and used that $625,000 to leverage a matching $625,000 grant from the State. And what did all of it pay for? A park that physically surrounds the home and yet, by its own boundary lines, EXCLUDED the home from the park entirely. Not one dime went to the structure the money was given to save. Returning money that was wrongfully taken from the home is not a loss to taxpayers. It is the correction of a wrong.
They falsely claim I excluded the school board and the commission for four years. That is an outright falsehood, and the record disproves it. As the former Chairman of the General Operations Committee, I formed an ad hoc committee to move this County project forward, and that committee included the school board member who represents the Liberty Creek campus, along with several citizens, among them neighbors of Mr. Brown and direct descendants of Colonel Jonathan Latimer, whose son Charles Latimer built this home. For more than three years I worked alongside those citizens and fellow commissioners to carry out the clear and lawful intent of Mr. Brown's gift, against continuous resistance from the very officials now claiming to be shut out. At a later date, Director of Schools Scott Langford and Sumner County Mayor John Isbell were also added to the Ad Hoc, yet they NEVER attended any meetings. You do not exclude the school board by giving it a seat at the table. You do not exclude the public by inviting the donor's neighbors and the builder's own descendants into the room.
And the Mayor says he is "merely following the process," still awaiting a background check and a signed contract for a County project (NOTE: this is NOT a school project). Ask yourself this. Why does a $6,400 piece of exploratory demolition, on county property, by a contractor who already completed work on this very home twice in June of 2025 with no objection, suddenly require hurdles that no other county project faces? When the answer to every solved objection is simply a new objection, that is not process. That is obstruction.
The people of Sumner County are entitled to ask one plain question. The $625,000 grant they maneuvered to secure was drawn, by its own boundary, to EXCLUDE the home. Of the $1.25 million combined that this scheme put in play, not one dollar was ever spent on the home itself or to ever be allocated to the home. So after nine years, and with the proposed cost of Langford's park, that excludes the house, now exceeding $2 million, why has not a single dollar reached the very home all of it was supposed to be about?
------
WHAT NEXT?
Here is what you can do. Attend the next General Operations Committee meeting and sign up to speak. Email the full Commission at [email protected] and tell them to stop stalling and let the approved, funded work begin. Watch the meetings yourself and share the truth with your neighbors. Sunlight remains the best disinfectant.
This home predates the State of Tennessee. It has stood for 230 years. It should not be sacrificed to protect anyone's ego or cover up anyone's mistakes. The County accepted a historic property with the understanding that the home would be preserved as the centerpiece of a future park. But the previous administration, school leadership, and commission allowed the $500,000 to be redirected into a state park grant that did not fund the home at all. The Brown House was not just overlooked. It was physically and legally drawn out of the TDEC grant project boundary. Not one dollar of that grant-funded scope went toward preserving the house.
At your service,
Jeremy