04/22/2019
Comments on THE REPORT INTO RUSSIA INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. The digital page numbers are used to reference the text that these comments, inside double page quotations, are made to. Also you may want to skip to and read the second to the last paragraph before coming back and starting on the next paragraph.
PAGE 9 Comment on third paragraph of page. ""The FBI on July 31, 2016 began its investigation into whether individuals associated with the Trump Campaign were coordinating with the Russian government in its interference activities.""
PAGE 16 to 18 Comment on The Special Counsel's Charging Decisions. ""The Special Counsel's Charging Decisions in the Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election after reading it it feels like one big: "We have nothing." And the reading before arriving to The Special Counsel's Charging Decisions is the same feel after seeing repeated many times "did not establish" and repeated over and over and over again. That as it relates to coordination conspiracy and collusion.""
PAGE 19 Comment on first paragraph and (i)(ii)(iii). ""Reading The Special Counsel's Investigation on page 19 (ii)'s "arise directly from the investigation" is with regard to the subject "any matters" and the predication being a affirmed directive on those matters is, if there be any matters, they must arise from the investigation. There's the clear directive "from the investigation" and the indictments charged arising from 2006 to prosecute Michael Cohen which all came by way of raiding a Law Firm's Office is not authorized by the scope of the investigation that is (i). The FBI and DOJ went beyond the scope of their authorized investigation because those 2006 matters didn't arise FROM the authorized investigation they arose from an investigation into Attorney Michael Cohen's professional business because he was attorney to Donald J. Trump. That is how I interpret appropriately construing the authorization and scope boundary set on the Appointment of Special Counsel to Investigate Russian Interference with the 2016 Presidential Election and Related Matters. There is no sound reasoning I think from which can be made that 2006 was and or is a matter or matters related to the Russian Interference Investigation. That speaks to (i) and (ii), I have not looked into (iii) to understand how it weighs in and applies on the investigation authorization.
A certainty made so by the fact that there is an official boundary set is that the investigation was not from the beginning intended giving complete, to the FBI and DOJ, freedom to act however they want; this is commonly referred to as "carte blanche." In principle faithful to Law as much as I can remember the Law never works in a carte blanche way. But it looks like that is what happened and at this point it also seems like Rod Rosenstein is who made and allowed it to be that way. Remember Rosenstein, he's the one who threatened to subpoena Congress Committee Members' documents for investigating them as a retaliatory action against them for questioning the FBI and FBI'S leadership and higher-ups.""
PAGE 20 Comment on the first full paragraph that page. ""The FBI and DOJ could not piece together coordination conspiracy and collusion with Russia. Therefore their investigation which began on July 31, 2016 turned into a prosecution that is most competently described only as based on "a political platform." Intelligently examining the fourteen months and 20 days history leading up to October 20, 2017 express that is what happened.""
PAGE 21 Comment of full first and second paragraphs that page. ""All 72+ public personnel employed and every action they executed.""
PAGE 37 Comment on first sentence to the last paragraph that page. ""Because a rally was talked about does not mean that a rally happened. The whole Special Counsel Mueller's reporting on "rallies" is an illusion. Figure it out! It is not hard with some thinking about it.
You see the FBI found out about alleged election interference 9 months after this confederate rally post. And it was 9 months later July 31, 2016 when the FBI began investigating into alleged collusion. So they don't know if this November 14, 2015 rally ever actually happened. Unless the FBI was there watching it in November 2015.
Therefore all Special Counsel Mueller has to show that "The IRA organized and promoted political rallies inside the United States while posing as U.S. grassroots activists" is Instagram ID 2228012168 (Stand For Freedom) on 11/3/15 wrote: "Good evening buds! Well I am planning to organize a confederate rally [...] in Houston on the 14 of November and I want more people to attend." THAT'S IT.
AND everybody knows that Instagram ID 222... Stand For Freedom was a complete fake and everybody also knows that more than 99% of talk to organize political rallies never evolves into a real rally happening.
This Special Counsel Report is a $27,000,000.00 illusion in its content which talks about Russia and Trump Campaign collusion. All the report has on collusion is comments that were made on social media. It is sickening!""
PAGE 39 Comment on first paragraph, and first sentence second paragraph that page. ""Again the word, a past tense verb, "organized" which at the time was "organizing" a rally by the ways that are verbs-the actions "thinking and talking about it" does not mean and neither does it make that the rally ever really happened. Then in the next sentence it speaks about "Pro-Trump rallies" but does not attribute those rallies to the IRA and neither does it say that they actually happened. Except in the next sentence "The Florida rallies drew the attention of...". And, also, whenever by whoever a rally does actually materialize it didn't happen because of the IRA it happened because Donald Trump really has people who are politically interested and voters.
Up to this point about the intelligence in this Report using the metaphor "a food connoisseur" for relating to the expertise in knowledge to the quality of the Report is: "It is Top Ramen noodle soup in the squarish package." Embarrassing! Again.""
PAGE 42 Comment on last paragraph on that page. ""People taking political credit for things and events which ended successful, whether they be bad things or good things, is something that happens very frequently everybody who's got some experience in events and happenings that have large encompassing influences and organization know this. Also there is almost always more than one "organizer" to those kinds of events and happenings, there are multiple cooperating organizers about which all organizers likely may not be communicating with each other.""
Now speaking to the treacherously unfaithful and criminal FBI; "What are you going to do about domestic government in every State of the Union criminally unfaithfully executing the laws for violating United States Citizens and illegally destroying Families also abducting Families' children by way of the assurances that is all the evils will happen by way of they laundered Judicially? What are you going to do about that? Please.
I am on digital page 44 hoping to continue.