12/07/2022
Legal Reform
1d
·
When demanding exoneration, have the states attorney cite your lawyer for ineffective assistance of counsel because effective assistance of counsel requires your lawyer to follow through with the Rules of Professional Conduct to the letter. Then add citing the person or persons that prosecuted you for Prosecutional misconduct for not enforcing or reporting your lawyer for failure to adhere to the Rules of Professional Conduct, reporting misconduct is mandatory in both the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Code of Judicial Conduct. Then have them cite the judge for Judicial misconduct for failing to report your lawyer and the prosecutor for failure to adhere,comply with the Rules of Professional Conduct and cite your lawyer and the prosecutor for failing to report the judge for not reporting them because reporting misconduct mandatory in both the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Code of Judicial Conduct. Don't forget to demand the prosecutor Expedite that litigation which is mandatory in the Rules of Professional Conduct. Failure to do so is incompetence and acting with competence is mandatory in the Rules of Professional Conduct. Diligence is required in the Rules of Professional Conduct so let's get this done, quick fast and in a hurry. Throw in, "IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED!!!".
I'm just quoting the laws within the courts of law. You should read the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Code of Judicial Conduct for verification. Your going to love the Preamble in both and will probably quote that as well. I love the part about you are required to have reasonable knowledge to make an informed decision. You didn't that's why you were deprived your right to DUE PROCESS, a FAIR TRIAL and a QUICK & SPEEDY TRIAL. To be honest, saying all that you don't need EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE. The 6th amendment guarantees you effective assistance of counsel and no lawyer can prove they are or were EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE of COUNSEL. Remember "The Letter of the Law" requires them to do all that word for word. I committed this to memory back in 1980 because I couldn't afford the books. Don't be me, print out a copy and take it with you so you don't miss a word. Now throw the book at them. O if filing a Post conviction or writ of habeas corpus use the above mention.
Help an old man fullfil his promise to the Almighty and let the truth be told. Knowledge is power my people, use the power of the constitution. For anyone to be in public service one must take the oath to uphold, defend, serve and protect the constitution and in taking that oath they take the oath to serve and protect you, my people, all the people,WE THE PEOPLE. When they ask "just who do you think you are", remind them, I am WE THE PEOPLE, I am many, we are one,this is who I am, WE THE PEOPLE!!! Now go be the hero in your own story.
Rules of Professional Conduct,
RULE 3.8: SPECIAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF A PROSECUTOR
The duty of a public prosecutor is to seek justice, not merely to convict. The prosecutor in a
criminal case shall:
(a) refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable
cause;
(b) make reasonable efforts to assure that the accused has been advised of the right to, and the
procedure for obtaining, counsel and has been given reasonable opportunity to obtain counsel;
(c) not seek to obtain from an unrepresented accused a waiver of important pretrial rights, such
as the right to a preliminary hearing;
(d) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the
prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection
with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information
known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a
protective order of the tribunal;
(e) not subpoena a lawyer in a grand jury or other criminal proceeding to present evidence
about a past or present client unless the prosecutor reasonably believes:
(1) the information sought is not protected from disclosure by any applicable privilege;
(2) the evidence sought is essential to the successful completion of an ongoing
investigation or prosecution; and
(3) there is no other feasible alternative to obtain the information;
(f) except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the
prosecutor’s action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, refrain from making
extrajudicial comments that pose a serious and imminent threat of heightening public
condemnation of the accused and exercise reasonable care to prevent investigators, law
enforcement personnel, employees or other persons assisting or associated with the prosecutor in
a criminal case from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited
from making under Rule 3.6 or this Rule.
(g) When a prosecutor knows of new, credible
