11/28/2021
It is the assigned responsibility of all ‘true’ historians representing families and locations to gather and PRESERVE the memories of their assigned or chosen subjects. But as is always the case of oral histories, within a short period of time the facts become muddled as soon as the ORIGINAL participants in a given event have passed on. Exacerbating this fact is the natural tendency for successive generations to rename places over time, especially when the original place name is foreign, esoteric, non-descriptive, or simply of no discernable meaning . The history of Fort Plank is a prime example.
William W. Campbell and William Stone, SENIOR, recognized this evolution and attempted to PRESERVE the MEMORY. Both wrote their histories within a decade of the renaming of the settlement at Fort Plank by 1831. We as ‘MODERN and more knowledgeable’ individuals can say with ease that they were “confused,” but in reality, they were not. They were both offering succeeding generations a great service by preserving the original name of a place which would soon be forgotten. Instead of acknowledging their efforts, we attack them, criticize them, and defame them by stating they had lost their memories, when in reality WE never had their memories for ourselves.
Wayne Lenig on page 43 of his tome “FORT PLAIN, FORT PLANK, FORT RENSSELAER: THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR FORTS OF CANAJOHARY,” privately published in 2020, remarked:
Nelson “Greene also contributed a bit of new information that reflects how quickly confusion can set into the collective memory. Again, he cites no source [and Lenig makes no effort to prove that such an event ever occurred], but contends that at a general meeting of the residents to vote on village incorporation in 1831, there was no opposition, except in the name. Some wanted the village named Fort Plank and others Fort Plain. Finally, Fort Plain was agreed upon and on the 25th of April, 1832, the village was incorporated." (Greene’s History of Old Fort Plain).
But could there have been a change in “the collective memory” by the men and women involved in defending Fort Plank and Fort Rensselaer brought about by unseen forces? We have now have strong evidence that in 1831 the name of the area known as “Fort Plank” was changed to “Fort Plain” and that change was not unanimously supported by the local residents, yet it occurred. Then on June 7, 1832, the United States Government enacted the 1832 Revolutionary War Pension Act. As a result, scores upon scores of the defenders of Fort Plank and Fort Rensselaer traveled to local courts to give their accounts of their service in the War. But, were the clerks in the War Department aware of this change. Most likely not! What resulted was a mass confusion amongst those seeking to obtain assistance from their government. ‘Do I testify to services at the place once known as,’ or ‘do I swear to services at the place as it is NOW known?’ No better explanation for the testimonies of the seven veterans who claimed that Fort Plank had been renamed Fort Plain, and the several others who testified that Fort Plain had a previous unmentioned name can be had. The place they knew as Fort Plank had been OFFICIALLY renamed in a vote to name a new village formed a mile to the south of the fort’s site: Fort Plain. A new Village with a new Post Office recognized by the Federal Government in Washington, D.C. We know for a fact that both Fort Rensselaer and Fort Plain existed simultaneously, as SEPARATE FACILITIES in 1783, from the records kept by Lieutenant Lawrence Tremper, the Quarter Master of Lieutenant Colonel Marinus Willett’s Corps. Tremper states he was stationed within Fort Rensselaer, but traveled to Fort Plain during the course of his official duties. Oh yes, Tremper speaks of Fort Plank as well, but not until after ‘The Peace’ in 1784 when he traveled to Fort Plank the home of the Sheriff of Tryon County, Abraham Van Horne, who lived there; not the home of Captain Jost House or the home of Frederick Plank, but the home of Abraham Van Horne. And then is the Orderly Book of Captain Moses Dusten of the New Hampshire Second Regiment which speaks of both Fort Rensselaer and Fort Plain as SEPARATE FACILITIES in 1782. Are we to thus believe that “the collective memory” of both Lieutenant Tremper and Captain Dusten expired before the end of the Revolution itself? According to Mr. Lenig YES! And the Revolutionary War Pension Application of Eliphalet Kellogg , S2692, born in Norwalk Township, Fairfield County, Connecticut in 1763 who testified in 1832, under oath, that he had served at both Forts Plain and Rensselaer, but not Fort Plank as a corporal in Captain Job Wright’s Company of Lieutenant Colonel Willett’s Regiment.
NO! “The collective memory” of their War Services did not change. Nor did the site of Fort Plank which had been renamed Fort Plain change. The Italian Physicist Paolo Andreani wrote in 1790 “. . . at the village called Fort Plain, which is composed of but a few homes and a Church, and inhabited by Germans . . . The Fort which gave name to the site is entirely destroyed, and there is also difficulty today to discover its plan. It was built with earth, and its situation was advantageous to command the navigation of the river.” (Along the Hudson and Mohawk . . . 2006, 51). And the site of Fort Rensselaer some three miles to the southeast, down-river from Fort Plank/Plain was not altered either.
Jeptha R. Simms, Benjamin Lossing, William Lettee Stone JUNIOR, Samuel Ludlow Frey, Nelson Greene, Wayne Lenig, Norm Bollen, and other historians of their day NEVER HAD a memory of the forts or of the naming convention for the new village at the mouth of the Otsquago Creek, only the “Cosmic Vibrations,” which Wayne Lenig likes to carry on about. It is a simple axiom of life that one cannot lose a memory which one never possessed. Let us all dismantle our walls and let the memories of the men and women of Tryon County speak for themselves. And allow us to collectively work toward restoring “the collective memory” proceed without slandering and libeling anyone who cares enough about their ancestry or their history to question those who were never blessed with “the collective memory.”
Let the open and public discussion begin “In Defense of the Facts, In an Ongoing Search for Fort Plank.”
www.fort-plank.com/In_Defense_Of_The_Facts_Endnoted_With_Graphics.pdf