06/08/2026
BRAVO!!!!
The recent decision by the St. Clair County Board of Commissioners to overhaul Animal Control was, in my opinion, a misguided and fear‑driven move.
For decades, communities across Michigan and throughout the country have relied on a proven model: trained Animal Control professionals serving as the front line for animal welfare and enforcement, working in coordination with law enforcement when criminal thresholds are met. This structure exists for a reason — it puts responsibility in the hands of those with the specific training, experience, and daily focus required to handle these complex cases.
There were multiple viable options available that would have allowed the county to address any legal or operational concerns while preserving that established model. Instead, the Board chose to dismantle it.
By removing enforcement authority from experienced Animal Control officers and shifting criminal investigations to the Sheriff’s Office, the county is abandoning a system that has worked and replacing it with an unproven approach. This change does not strengthen public safety — it risks weakening it.
The Sheriff’s Office already carries an immense workload and operates under staffing constraints. Adding another layer of responsibility — particularly one that requires specialized knowledge of animal behavior, livestock care, and welfare standards — creates a real risk that these cases will not receive the focused attention they require.
And as a direct result of this decision, the county has already lost one of the best Animal Control directors it has been fortunate to have. Having worked with Director Melissa Miller on multiple cases, I can personally attest to her knowledge, professionalism, and dedication. Her expertise was evident, and I had full confidence in her leadership. We were better off with her at the helm, and her resignation is a significant loss to this county.
When responsibility is divided and diluted, accountability often follows. That raises a serious concern: will these cases remain a priority, or will they gradually become just another duty competing for limited time and resources?
Good policy should build on what works, not discard it. It should be shaped by experience, collaboration, and thoughtful problem‑solving — not reactionary decisions driven primarily by fear or liability concerns.
Our residents — and the animals that depend on us for protection — deserved a more balanced, well‑considered approach.