04/10/2019
Today (4/9) it was announced that the Board would be voting on the replacement for the vacancy in a special board meeting tomorrow (4/10). I want to be transparent and share my thoughts on this with the public.
It was decided at the last special meeting that the next board meeting would be the regularly scheduled meeting on April 15th. At that time, the election had not yet happened, so Christy and I were not on the board.
It was only AFTER the official election results were shared on Friday that Danuser (board president) decided to call a special meeting. Again, this was scheduled only AFTER it was evident that Hunter would not retain her seat on the board, and would, therefore, not be voting in the regularly scheduled meeting, that this meeting was called.
Danuser scheduled this meeting without first consulting with other board members on dates and times they were available. Tommy Beauchamp cannot attend, as he is out of town. It is also unlikely that Clay will be able to attend, as he has a prior obligation he will be attending.
The candidates who put their names in for the vacancy were not even notified about the meeting until Monday evening at 4pm (yes, only two days before the special meeting would take place). They were told that if they could not be there to be interviewed, then they would not even be considered for the vacancy. As it stands, at least one candidate has told me that they will not be able to make it, as they only had not even two full days to rearrange their schedule for this last minute meeting.
Then today, they announced in their agenda, which is attached below, that not only would they be interviewing the candidates, but they are going to go ahead and vote on them, too.
This entire situation is extremely unethical.
First of all, instead of waiting to vote on the vacancy replacement until the two candidates who you, the public, has elected (Christy and myself), they are trying to rush in the vote so Hunter can vote. Like I stated above, at the last special meeting, they said the next meeting would the regularly scheduled meeting on the 15th. Why rush it now?
Two, it isn't fair to the candidates. With it being such a last-minute meeting, it isn't fair that they are voting this Wednesday without giving them the chance to rearrange their schedules for an interview.
And it isn't fair to the public that you will now have an inaccurate representation with both Tommy and Clay likely being absent, and your newly elected candidates not being given a say in the matter.
_________________________________________
Lastly, I want to make it known that one of the candidates is a next-door neighbor to Mark Harvey. It has been said that their families are very close, so close that they farm together and vacation together. This same candidate (Mark Liana) has previously served on the board, but resigned shortly after his son did not get hired at vo-tech. Why does he now want to be appointed? Why did he resign? Does he have the ability to work with others? Would he recuse himself or abstain on anything related to Harvey, because isn't their relationship a conflict of interest?
__________________________________________
It is so important that people show up to the meeting tomorrow. Only you all are able to voice objection at this point. Let the community know what is going on!