United College Park

United College Park Join us in shaping a brighter future for College Park, GA. Together, we can bring change and unity to our community.

04/11/2025

🧠 WHAT WAS SHE THINKING?

As Councilwoman Jamelle McKenzie tries to block the recall effort against her, her own words—and those of her attorney—are raising serious questions.

👇 Two moments that should make anyone in College Park pause:

🚩 1. “You Processed the Signatures Too Fast”

After the city verified 210 signatures to move the recall forward (more than double the required amount), McKenzie’s attorney didn’t argue the count was wrong.

Instead, he complained about… the speed:
“I am beyond fascinated that your office could process this application so quickly.”
– Jeremy Berry, McKenzie's attorney

So… verifying the people’s will quickly and correctly is now suspicious?

🚨 2. “We’ll Depose You for Doing Your Job”

In the same email, her attorney goes after the City Clerk for certifying the petition:
“We expect to depose you... including personal emails and cell phones.”

They’re threatening a city employee with a lawsuit—for certifying a legal petition signed by real voters.
Let that sink in.

If this is how she treats public servants doing their jobs… imagine how she treats regular residents who speak up.

This isn’t leadership. It’s intimidation dressed up as legal strategy.

📢 College Park, pay attention.
🗳 The recall isn’t just about what McKenzie has done—it’s also about how she reacts when held accountable.

🔗 Learn more: www.RecallJamelleMcKenzie.com

Important updates about tonight's workshop and council meeting
04/07/2025

Important updates about tonight's workshop and council meeting

Please join us for our first meeting of April. Learn more about what we’ll discuss here!

03/18/2025

Below are Mose James comments from the March 17th City Council Meeting:

Good evening, Councilmembers,

A year ago—on March 18, 2024—I was at home helping my son with his homework when this Council quietly added a rezoning item to the agenda at the start of a meeting, with no notice to the community. There was no public hearing. No transparency. The residents had no idea that action would be taken on this land.

That last-minute move paved the way for NextEra Energy—a multi-billion-dollar company—to build a battery storage facility in the neighborhood I grew up in. To make matters worse, this community was deceived with the promise of a $1.6 million grant that would supposedly accompany the rezoning. We later learned it was nothing more than a contingency agreement—money the city would only receive if it sold out its residents by approving this facility.

Since 2021, we have raised concerns about safety, transparency, and the risks this project imposes on residents.

Instead of proving that you were acting in the best interests of this community, this Council spent the past year using our tax dollars to fight against us in court—fighting against the very people who elected you. And last week, there was a press release celebrating the dismissal of our case. A victory lap at our expense.

Let’s be clear: this case wasn’t dismissed because the rezoning was done properly. It was dismissed because we didn’t file a grievance within 30 days. That’s it. We simply didn’t call out your misconduct fast enough.

But let me make something else clear: We are not backing down. We will appeal this decision.

Over the past year, while this Council wasted tens of thousands of dollars to push this dangerous battery facility into our community, here’s what has happened at similar facilities across the country:

April 29, 2024 – Kearny Mesa, CA: A battery storage facility caught fire at a San Diego Gas & Electric site. Fire crews had to isolate the unit to prevent a full-scale disaster.

May 15, 2024 – Otay Mesa, CA: A massive fire burned for over a week at the Gateway Energy Storage facility. Toxic smoke forced evacuation warnings for businesses and a shelter-in-place order for an adjacent state prison.

July 17, 2024 – Santa Ana, CA: Another battery fire erupted, forcing the evacuation of several blocks in an industrial district.

September 5, 2024 – Escondido, CA: A battery storage facility caught fire, forcing 1,200 people to evacuate while toxic fumes filled the air.

January 16, 2025 – Moss Landing, CA: One of the largest battery storage sites in the country burned for days, sending thick black smoke over Monterey Bay and leading to a state of emergency declaration.��While this was not a battery plant, September 29, 2024 just up the road in Conyers Bio-Lab, Inc. burned and sent a cloud of smoke and toxic chemicals all the way to my back porch here on Rugby avenue. That fire was 45 miles away, this proposed battery facility supported by the council is only 7 miles from where we sit right now.

These aren’t hypotheticals. These are real fires that happened in the past year—since you approved this rezoning. And in every single case, it took massive firefighting efforts and evacuations to keep people safe.

Meanwhile, this Council refuses to even acknowledge the risks. No independent safety studies. No mitigation plan for the people who will be living next to this facility. And while **Councilwoman McKenzie loves to claim that her predecessor supported this project, she conveniently leaves out the fact that he also pushed for a special set of safety precautions—**precautions that were never included in the final rezoning.

Why are we appealing?

Because there is competing case law that says when a piece of land is rezoned improperly, the rezoning is invalid. And when this Council rezoned this land, there was no public hearing.

You betrayed this community.

And now, instead of fixing the mistake, you are patting yourselves on the back.

If you want to learn more or join the fight, visit www.unitedcollegepark.com

We will continue to fight. And we will hold every single one of you accountable.

Thank you.

03/09/2025

🔴BREAKING: Taxpayer Dollars Used to Fund McKenzie’s Personal Attorney!🔴

📣DID YOU KNOW?
The City of College Park is using your tax dollars to pay for Councilwoman Jamelle McKenzie’s personal attorney in her lawsuit against Mose James IV, the Petitioner in the recall effort, and Deputy City Clerk Queenie Brown. While this decision isn’t new, many residents are just now learning about it.

🔥But That’s Not All…
During the first court hearing, Judge Belinda E. Edwards issued a strong rebuke of McKenzie’s overreach in city affairs, calling out her interference in operations beyond her role as a council member—yet this legal fight drags on at your expense.

⚖️JUDGE BELINDA E. EDWARDS’ STATEMENT ON MCKENZIE’S OVERREACH:
💬“You are an elected Council Member. I’ll never understand how if you are elected for a particular office, you decide—because you’ve been elected—you should have a say in how the Department of Water works, who should have that position, or which roads get paved. It muddies the waters, and it gets us here. Because it’s all about who gets favor and who doesn’t, in my eyes.” – Judge Belinda E. Edwards, Superior Court of Fulton County

📢Translation: Even the judge sees the problem—political interference, favoritism, and blurred lines in governance.

🔴WHY THIS MATTERS:
💰Your tax dollars are funding both sides of this lawsuit, creating a massive conflict of interest.
🚫McKenzie’s personal attorney is being paid with public money—a move criticized by the Georgia First Amendment Foundation.
⏳The recall effort has been stalled by legal tactics, but a crucial May 7, 2025, court hearing will determine if it moves forward.

🔎SEE THE LEGAL FILINGS FOR YOURSELF:
https://recalljamellemckenzie.com/
- McKenzie’s Lawsuit & Exhibits
- Committee’s Response & Supporting Evidence

⚖️THE RECALL PROCESS – WHY IS IT SO HARD?
In Georgia, recalling an elected official is designed to be difficult, with multiple legal hurdles:
1️⃣Application for Recall – A formal request must be submitted.
2️⃣Signature Collection – Requires 100 signatures (✅ 233 were collected!).
3️⃣Judicial Review – A judge reviews the case’s legal merit (happening now).
4️⃣Election Board Verification – Officials verify petition signatures.
5️⃣Special Election – If all steps are cleared, voters decide McKenzie’s fate at the ballot box.

⏳WHAT’S NEXT?
The May 7 court hearing will determine if the recall can proceed or if McKenzie’s legal delays will continue at your expense. This case is about government accountability, citizens’ rights to challenge officials, and how public funds are spent.

💬What do you think?
Should your tax dollars be used to fund McKenzie’s personal attorney? Let us know in the comments! ⬇️

📢 Stay informed & engaged. Follow www.recalljamellemckenzie.com for real-time updates.

🔹 🔹 🔹 🔹 🔹

Dear Neighbors,Your dedication, attention, and care played a vital role in shaping an important decision for College Par...
02/26/2025

Dear Neighbors,

Your dedication, attention, and care played a vital role in shaping an important decision for College Park. Through your engagement—whether by attending meetings, asking questions, or sharing insights—you helped ensure that the people elected to represent you made an informed choice. This was a true example of what happens when a community comes together to advocate for itself and hold its leadership accountable.

On February 24th, the City Council held the third and final public hearing on whether College Park would opt in or opt out of the state’s floating homestead exemption under House Bill 581. After weeks of discussion and public input, the vote resulted in a rare tie, requiring Mayor Bianca Motley Broom to cast the deciding vote.

How the Vote was Decided:
❌ Voting to Opt Out (supporting a locally crafted exemption): Councilmembers McKenzie and Carn
✅ Voting to Opt In (aligning College Park with the statewide system): Councilmembers Gay, Arnold (who attended via Zoom), and Mayor Motley Broom
With the mayor’s tie-breaking vote, College Park will remain opted in to the state’s floating homestead exemption.

What This Means for Our Community:
For Homeowners
By remaining in the statewide exemption, some homeowners will see property tax adjustments tied to inflation rather than fluctuating market-driven increases. By opting-in this will cap how much your city property taxes can increase year-to-year. This framework aims to provide predictability in tax assessments, though its long-term impact on residents and city revenue will continue to be evaluated.

For the City
This decision aligns College Park with other municipalities that have opted in, rather than creating a local exemption with more flexibility. The council initially prepared a resolution to opt out, indicating there was consideration for a different approach, but after discussion and hearing from the community, the final vote took a different direction.

For Our Senior Residents
One of the biggest concerns raised was whether this decision would affect the senior homestead exemption that was recently passed by the council and is currently working its way through the legislative process. The answer is no—seniors will still receive the full tax relief promised under the city’s senior homestead exemption, IF it successfully clears all remaining hurdles. While the council has approved it, it still requires approval from state legislators, the Governor’s signature, and ultimately, voter approval on the ballot before it is fully enacted. This decision does not take away or modify those benefits, but it is important to stay engaged as the process moves forward.

Key Considerations in This Decision:
🟢This was the third of three public hearings, ensuring residents had multiple opportunities to weigh in.
🟢The deadline to make a decision was March 1, 2025. Without council action, the city would have remained opted in by default.
🟢College Park is ineligible for FLOST (Floating Local Option Sales Tax) because we already have MOST (Municipal Option Sales Tax). Some concerns were raised about tax revenue, but this decision does not impact the city’s share of sales tax collections.
🟢Property taxes are a critical part of funding city operations. The council had to weigh potential tax relief for homeowners against the need for flexibility in future budget decisions.

Your Engagement Made a Difference

This vote was an example of how important community engagement is. Regardless of where individuals stood on this issue, the discussions leading up to this decision made one thing clear—the voices of College Park residents guided the choices made by those we elected to serve us.

Your participation ensures that decisions affecting our city are made with transparency and accountability. This was just one of many key discussions shaping the future of College Park, and your involvement continues to be the foundation of real change.

Thank you for showing up, staying engaged, and working toward a better College Park.

Stay informed. Stay united.

United College Park

02/17/2025

Here is a summary of the February 16th meeting. The homestead opt-out will be discussed tonight during Workshop and the regular Council meeting.

Overview
The United College Park (UCP) town hall focused on key issues affecting College Park, GA, with an emphasis on transparency, accountability, and civic engagement. Discussions centered on the statewide homestead opt-out, open records challenges, necessary charter reforms, updates on legal and development issues, and fundraising efforts to support community-driven initiatives.

Key Discussion Points
1. Emergency Medical & Ambulance Services
College Park does not have a transporting license for emergency medical services, causing delays and inefficiencies.

UCP is pushing for a Region 3 emergency contract to allow city-run transport services.

Email addresses for relevant officials will be posted to facilitate advocacy efforts.

2. Statewide Homestead Opt-Out (Speaker: Ryan Bowersox, Georgia Municipal Association)
House Bill 581 introduces a floating homestead exemption that caps property value increases at the rate of inflation.

Local governments can opt out via public hearings and a resolution but cannot opt in later.

Concerns were raised about:

Impact on school and county funding.

Compressed public hearing schedule, with two hearings held back-to-back.

Tax burden potentially shifting to renters and businesses.

Detailed Review of Ryan Bowersox’s Input on the Tax Issue
Ryan Bowersox provided a comprehensive breakdown of the impact of House Bill 581, which introduces a floating homestead exemption designed to cap property tax increases at the rate of inflation. His key insights included:

Mechanics of the Homestead Exemption:

The exemption stabilizes property taxes by limiting annual increases to no more than the Consumer Price Index (CPI), ensuring predictability for homeowners.

Each jurisdiction must decide whether to opt out through formal public hearings and a council vote.

Unlike other tax exemptions, this measure does not allow for a future opt-in, meaning once a jurisdiction opts out, it cannot rejoin the exemption system.

Impact on Homeowners and Local Government:

Homeowners would benefit from tax stability, as the exemption prevents unexpected property tax spikes due to market fluctuations.

However, local governments could face budgetary shortfalls, as their revenue from property taxes may not keep pace with inflation-driven cost increases.

This could lead to increased financial strain on municipalities and potential cuts to essential services.

Effect on Renters and Businesses:

If local governments experience revenue gaps, they may shift tax burdens to businesses and rental properties to compensate.

Renters could see higher rental costs, as landlords pass on increased tax obligations to tenants.

Business owners might experience higher commercial property tax rates, potentially discouraging new investments.

Concerns Over Public Hearings and Decision Process:

Ryan emphasized that public awareness and participation are crucial, as many residents may not fully understand the implications of opting in or out.

College Park’s approach to scheduling two public hearings in one day raised concerns about whether residents would have sufficient opportunity for input.

He encouraged greater community engagement to ensure an informed decision-making process.

Ryan’s presentation underscored the complexity of balancing homeowner protections with municipal fiscal responsibility, stressing the importance of transparency and resident involvement in these decisions.

3. Open Records Act Challenges (Speaker: Richard Snellings, Open Records Advocate)
South Fulton officials blocked open records requests, leading to legal action.

Mediation resulted in public training on open records laws.

Issues persist with high fees and lack of employee training on compliance.

Advice for attendees:

Narrow requests to avoid excessive costs.

Ask for transaction histories rather than full credit card statements.

Calls for greater transparency and accountability from city officials.

4. Charter Improvement Opportunities (Speaker: Grace McPhillips Lunsford)
College Park’s mayor lacks veto power, weakening executive oversight.

Some council members were elected with fewer than 100 votes, raising concerns about representation.

Proposed reforms include:

Ranked-choice voting.

Stronger ethics rules.

Term limits for council members.

Oversight and reconfiguration of BIDA (Business & Industrial Development Authority).

Outrage over council spending money on lobbyists to fight against charter reforms.

5. Legal Team Updates
Bill Evans Field Sale:

The city council granted Creed Acquisition unlimited time to clear title defects and assume legal fees.

Many called this a dereliction of duty, with suggestions to expose the issue in the media.

Concerns that the city is prioritizing developers over preserving community assets.

Battery Plant:

Lack of transparency in rezoning approval.

Legal actions are being considered, but fundraising is required to proceed.

Recall Effort Against Councilwoman Jamelle McKenzie:

Over $120K in taxpayer money has been spent on McKenzie’s personal attorney, who is suing a resident and a city employee.

Debate over filing a parallel recall petition but concerns about legal delays.

Goal: Hold recall vote before the end of the year.

Action Items & Next Steps
Advocate for a College Park ambulance transport license by engaging Region 3 emergency officials.

Monitor and challenge the Homestead Opt-Out process to ensure fair hearings.

Increase transparency by promoting open records requests and tracking compliance.

Lobby for charter improvements, including ranked-choice voting, ethics reform, and council oversight.

Expose the Bill Evans Field sale issue to the media and push for public accountability.

Raise funds for legal actions, including:

Open records requests.

Legal challenges against the battery plant rezoning.

Costs associated with the recall effort.

Attend the 'Save Parklane' meeting on Thursday to discuss further community advocacy strategies.

Community Engagement
Residents are encouraged to write to officials, attend meetings, and stay informed.

Fundraising is crucial to sustain legal efforts and hold officials accountable.

Attendees were reminded to provide contact information for updates.

Conclusion
The meeting concluded with a strong call to action for community members to stay engaged, contribute to fundraising efforts, and continue holding local government accountable. The urgency of preserving community spaces, increasing transparency, and ensuring fair governance was emphasized.

02/16/2025

Address

College Park, GA
30337

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when United College Park posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share