Jay Galbreath, Williamson County School Board District 6

Jay Galbreath, Williamson County School Board District 6 I am honored to represent the 6th District of Williamson County on the School Board. Visit here fo

My letter to the editor in the Williamson Herald posted today regarding the latest lawsuit by Gino Bulso. https://www.wi...
05/13/2025

My letter to the editor in the Williamson Herald posted today regarding the latest lawsuit by Gino Bulso.

https://www.williamsonherald.com/opinion/columns/williamson-county-needs-solutions-not-political-theater/article_37b42813-c0cd-4993-8b3f-eb58932aef87.html?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR5eh5jbYPqLvS_BqP79oXbi2F2d0rC3lew6vQrhov_d7SH4OimsutbG15UC4A_aem_9dKS8js-LMAts2vzTPkZaw

State Rep. Gino Bulso, school board members Tony Bostic, Donna Clements and Margie Johnson, along with County Commissioners Mary Smith, Barbara Sturgeon and Drew Torres, have filed a lawsuit against

I know this site is usually satirical, but this is 100% truth. 
05/05/2025

I know this site is usually satirical, but this is 100% truth. 

📍DATELINE: WILLIAMSON COUNTY — THE COST OF SUCCESS

Why State Education Funding Leaves Williamson County Behind

Last week in The Dump, we flagged a quiet but brutal truth: Tennessee’s school funding formula is kneecapping Williamson County.

It’s called TISA—the Tennessee Investment in Student Achievement Act. Passed in 2022 to replace the old Basic Education Program (BEP), TISA was sold as a simpler, student-focused model.

The reality? It’s a formula that penalizes fast-growing, high-performing, high-cost-of-living counties like ours—and props up the ones doing less with more. TISA pretends to be fair while quietly siphoning resources from the very districts that keep the system afloat.

Let’s break it down.



💸 THEY THINK WE’RE RICH. SO THEY CUT THE CHECK SHORT.

At the heart of TISA is “fiscal capacity”—a state estimate of what each county could spend on education, regardless of what it actually does.

If the state thinks you can afford more, they give you less.

📌 The math:
• Williamson’s current property tax rate: $1.88, dropping to $1.34 after reassessment
• Davidson (Nashville): $2.92
• Shelby (Memphis): $3.39
• State average: ~$2.00

Despite our lower rate, Williamson funds nearly 65% of its schools locally—almost double the state average. The state covers just 32%, and falling.

And no, TISA doesn’t reward effort. It assumes we’re lazy, then cuts the check.

Even worse? It barely accounts for cost of living.
Teachers here pay Brentwood rent. They buy Franklin groceries. They fill up in Cool Springs. But the state treats us like we’re living in a county where the median rent wouldn’t get you a storage closet here.

We’re being punished for efficiency. Penalized for performance. And overcharged for being responsible.



😩 WHO PAYS THE PRICE?

Spoiler: not the state.

It’s our teachers, checking Zillow like it’s a horror film. Many can’t live in the county they serve.

It’s our staff, juggling weekend gigs just to make ends meet. Late bus? Here’s your short answer: funding.

It’s parents, drafted into never-ending bake sales, fund drives and budget battles.

And it’s kids, told they’re lucky to be here—right before their teacher takes a job in a district that actually pays for one.

This isn’t theoretical. It’s personal.

Schools don’t run on gratitude and good intentions. They run on people—great ones—who are being priced out of the very community they serve.

The reward for running a successful district? Do it alone.



📈 GROWTH DOESN’T HELP—IT HURTS

Williamson has added students every year for two decades. More students should equal more funding, right?

Not under TISA.

There’s a “fast-growth” grant—but it only kicks in with sudden spikes. Our steady, sustained growth doesn’t qualify.

So the more responsibly we grow, the harder it gets to fund what we’ve built.

We plan. We build. We staff.
The state? It applauds politely—and cuts the check shorter.



🏠 THIS ISN’T JUST A SCHOOL PROBLEM. IT’S A COMMUNITY THREAT.

Strong schools do more than educate—they stabilize property values, attract families, support business, and strengthen neighborhoods.

Undermine that, and everything else cracks.

When teachers leave, families follow. When costs rise but support doesn’t, performance slips. When excellence becomes unaffordable, mediocrity becomes policy.

TISA isn’t just short-changing schools. It’s threatening the foundation of one of Tennessee’s best-run counties.



💰 WE’RE THE DONOR DISTRICT—AND EVERYONE ELSE LIKES IT THAT WAY

This isn’t an accident. The legislature knows what TISA does—and who pays the bill.

✔️ Rural counties with low tax bases? Getting topped off.
✔️ Urban districts with declining enrollment? Also getting topped off.
❌ Williamson County? Told to fund more and smile through it.

We pay more. We get less. And we’re told we’re lucky.

We don’t qualify for relief. We get no cost-of-living adjustment.
And we sure don’t get credit for leading the state.

Instead, they hand us the same assumptions they’d use for a county with a Dollar General and a volunteer fire department—and call it even.

We are the donor district. And they’re betting we’ll stay quiet.



📣 TISA IS BROKEN.

This isn’t a call for special treatment. It’s a call for basic fairness.

✅ A funding model that reflects real cost of living
✅ A formula that rewards growth, not punishes it
✅ A system that respects high-performing communities instead of punishing them for being functional

Williamson County is doing its part. The state isn’t.

Fix the formula. Fix the numbers. Fix TISA—before our own hard-earned success becomes unaffordable.

EDIT: So what do we do? Please share your ideas in the comments.

03/21/2025

Clarifying My Vote on the Science Curriculum Adoption

I want to take a moment to explain my vote on the science curriculum adoption at Monday’s board meeting. I know many teachers and parents are frustrated that the board did not approve the committee’s recommendation. I understand that frustration, and I take my responsibility on the board very seriously.

While I recognize the hard work of our teachers and the committee, the information provided to the board was insufficient to make a fully informed decision. The only data we received was the number of teachers who voted for each curriculum. There were no written teacher evaluations explaining their preferences—meaning we had no insight into why certain curricula were favored. Without that critical context, we had to analyze other factors that impact our students and district as a whole.

Why I Could Not Support the Recommended Curriculum for K-8

1️⃣ Technology Concerns – The recommended curriculum (Savvas and McGraw Hill) relies heavily on digital platforms, requiring significant screen time for students. The board has repeatedly heard from parents and stakeholders who are concerned about excessive technology use in the classroom, particularly in elementary grades. We also have a Screen Time Committee actively evaluating how we should be using technology in instruction. Adopting a tech-heavy curriculum for the next 6–8 years before we’ve even made that determination would be premature.

2️⃣ Research and Student Outcomes – The recommended curriculum had limited research supporting its effectiveness. In contrast, STEMscopes, the curriculum the board approved, meets the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Tier 2 standard for “Moderate Evidence.” This means it is supported by well-designed studies showing positive student learning outcomes across multiple states. While teacher input is important, I also believe we must prioritize evidence-based curricula that have demonstrated success in improving student achievement.

3️⃣ A Flawed Process – I want to acknowledge my part in how this process unfolded. I take responsibility for not asking sooner, adding better decision criteria, or pushing for more detailed teacher feedback earlier in the adoption timeline. But now that the flaws in the process are clear, I don’t believe we should move forward with a 6–8 year curriculum commitment based on incomplete information. The current curriculum adoption process did not provide the level of detail needed for a fully informed decision. Instead of just seeing the results of a teacher vote, the board needs comprehensive teacher feedback explaining their reasoning. Moving forward, we must improve this process so that teacher perspectives are documented and provided in a way that allows the board to fully consider them.

Moving Forward

I know this decision has disappointed many of you, and I want to assure you I did not take this vote lightly. I have the deepest respect for our teachers, and I want to see a process where their voices are better reflected—not just in a vote count, but in detailed feedback that helps inform our decisions.

I welcome respectful discussion about how we can improve this process for the future. My goal is always to make data-driven, student-centered decisions, and I believe this was the right choice given the information we had.

I also want to be clear: I am committed to working with my fellow board members to adapt our curriculum adoption process through policy in the coming months. We owe it to our teachers, students, and community to get this right moving forward.

If you have any questions or concerns, I encourage you to reach out. I’m always open to conversation about what’s best for our students.

Mr Parker is a Williamson County and Brentwood Treasure. I had the privilege of attending BHS while he was still Princip...
11/09/2024

Mr Parker is a Williamson County and Brentwood Treasure. I had the privilege of attending BHS while he was still Principal. No one loves a school more than he does Brentwood High and the Bruins.

BRENTWOOD – James C. Parker dressed in one of his many Brentwood High School long-sleeved shirts Friday night as his Bruins battled into the second round of the Class 6A

The reaction to my endorsement and lack of confidence in Moms For Liberty highlights the over-politicization of our scho...
07/19/2024

The reaction to my endorsement and lack of confidence in Moms For Liberty highlights the over-politicization of our schools and our kids. I got this question and wanted to address it here. It’s long so my apologies in advance, but these things cannot be answered in sound bites.

This is a great example and makes my point perfectly. M4L started to talk about CRT - then they came across someone who had a complaint about curriculum so they focused on that. But they couldn’t stop at the 4-5 books that were truly problematic, they tried to nitpick 30-40 and it lost the impact. Real changes were made because of their inquiry but they consider nothing short of removing the entire curriculum a win, but they have no regard for cost or a process that makes that impossible. Then they were outraged by this and that. And then the election was over. You want to know how many times I’ve seen M4L at our board meetings since 2022? They’ve been invisible. They don’t want to be a part of the schools or make them better. M4L want to highlight all the things that are wrong with WCS - and a lot of things that are wrong nationally that they try to make you afraid of whether it is actually going on here or not.

Let me ask you a question. Has M4L EVER published or taken a public stand to say ANYTHING POSITIVE about WCS?

This is the problem. This is what I mean about over-politicizing our schools. These people don’t care about our kids - though I’m sure many have them in our schools and private schools and homeschools. They want to use the problems in our schools to make whatever point they are trying to make. They aren’t always wrong and there are obviously issues that we have to deal with and are dealing with.

Let’s take the s*xually explicit books. In response to Wit and Wisdom, we modified the curriculum. Removed a few books and modified several others. The complaint highlighted some deficiencies in the curriculum. It’s not perfect. I liked the idea of reading books rather than snippets, and our teachers recommended it overwhelmingly. As a Board, we heard nothing of the complaints until we had spent the millions to buy it. There was also never an alternative state-approved curriculum brought to the table. You can’t just be AGAINST something. What are you for?

For library books, there were a series of books that were reviewed per a complaint. One was from one of my schools so I sat on the committee. The committee removed a couple of the books from use in the 10th grade English curriculum. Did you know that? There was also a request to remove the books from the library. The response of both committee and the board was that the state law didn’t provide enough information to describe what the Board can consider to remove a book. You have to understand that this is a highly litigated area and there is case law that governs what boards can and can’t do. School boards have the statutory authority to put books in libraries and remove them and that authority is shared with librarians. Based on the case law, which is the law of the land, the courts maintain that librarians have ultimate authority to choose the books going into and to be removed from the library. But the ability for the Board to do so is SEVERELY LIMITED.

So what have I / we as the Board done?
1) The state has come out with I believe now 2 new Laws, the age Appropriateness law and a new one regarding s*xually explicit material.
2) Now that we have the direction that we were lacking from the state, the Board just passed a new policy regarding library books.

The new policy has the necessary qualifications and protections that if we were to remove a book from the library by the right process and for the right reasons based on state and federal law, we now have a legitimate chance of upholding our decision when it is challenged in court.

We will be sued. It happens all the time. We can’t stop it. But what I’ve been focused on over the past 3+ years is creating policy and procedures so when we get sued we aren’t wasting taxpayer dollars on lawsuits that we would most definitely lose.

You didn’t mention Title IX but it’s worth mentioning here. The new EO modifying Title IX to change the definition of Sex/Gender has been stayed by the courts. Likely indefinitely. WCS policy has and is and will continue to be that we recognize a student's s*x as their s*x at birth for purposes of sports and use of restroom/locker rooms. That was our policy before the state created a law to that effect and now we are in accordance with that law. IF Title IX changes, I will be the first to stand up and fight it. I will not support any effort to allow biological males to compete in female sports or share bathroom/locker room facilities. This is an example of certain litigation as well, but this is an example of a new issue where case law hasn’t been clearly defined and I’m perfectly fine to join others who step forward and challenge this law for the protection of our students.

If you have read this entire post, my apologies for its length. But the purpose is to highlight what is wrong with M4L and those who wish to shout from the rooftops all the current political issues of the day. We need to address these things, and I think we have and continue to do so. If M4L want to engage and be part of the solution rather than just pointing out all the problems, I’m here and ready to work with you. If you truly want to do the right thing for our schools and our students, then show up during the 20 months between election cycles and help make our schools better.

*updated for some typos. And I posted the wrong pic so it shows the question I am answering.

**Important Update: Why I’m Endorsing Melissa Wyatt for District 7 School Board**As many of you know, I have served on t...
07/17/2024

**Important Update: Why I’m Endorsing Melissa Wyatt for District 7 School Board**

As many of you know, I have served on the Williamson County School Board for the past 10 years. During this time, I have come to understand the crucial qualities needed in board members to ensure the success of our schools and the well-being of our teachers, students, and families.

Today, I want to address a pressing issue: the attempts by Williamson Families and Moms for Liberty to influence our local politics and our schools. These groups have consistently pushed an extreme agenda that I believe is detrimental to our community and our educational system. Posing under the guise of “True Conservatives,” their brand of politics, antics, and lack of decorum do not reflect my values, nor the values of the community that I have called home for nearly 50 years. Their focus on politicizing school board decisions undermines the very foundation of what we should stand for – the best interests of our children and their education.

This is why I am endorsing Melissa Wyatt for District 7 on the Williamson County School Board. Melissa is not driven by political ideology but by a genuine commitment to our schools and our community. As a dedicated PTO volunteer, a committed Christian wife and mother, and an active member of Brentwood United Methodist, Melissa embodies the values and dedication we need on our school board.

Melissa and I share a common goal: to protect our schools from extremism on both sides and to focus on what truly matters – providing the best education for our children. For those Republicans who are wary of voting for an Independent, I urge you to consider Melissa’s unwavering commitment to our community over any political label.

Please join me in supporting Melissa Wyatt, a candidate who prioritizes the well-being of our children and the future of our schools. Let's move beyond the extremes and work together for the betterment of Williamson County.

I am really interested in getting parent feedback on this. We all know the technology use is more than we could ever dre...
07/10/2024

I am really interested in getting parent feedback on this. We all know the technology use is more than we could ever dream both in and outside of school. I can’t imagine any research telling us that more technology use in school is good. Particularly when there’s likely very little educational use of phones during the school day.
I imagine negative feedback might come from parents who want access to their kids during the day, and I wonder if given the choice between getting their kids off their phones during the school day and being able to text their kids for non-emergent situation what you guys would choose.

https://www.11alive.com/article/news/education/dekalb-county-schools-test-cellphone-pouches-lockers/85-ad8707e2-d96a-45ad-a6e1-26902d125e1d?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR3RvUjys8FHYBkzi14ENWIWYprpOuu_ZBv4pBf91mpSIxm1K6LKb-o4Yz8_aem_CRY-WRijER9qm-ef6cozyQ

Five middle schools and five high schools will use "Yondr" pouches this fall. Three other schools will try a locker system.

05/25/2024

Congratulations to all WCS Graduates! Especially my Raptor.

05/25/2024
05/24/2024

Let’s talk Chromebooks.

In the WCS Budget, there is a need for $6.5M of Chromebooks and it’s easy to look at this item and question whether this is a need or a want, because I had the same questions. I had a lengthy conversation with IT and Operations Staff and want to share what I learned, as well as get your opinions.

1. We replaced MS Chromebooks last year, approximately 11k of them, and they were ~4 years old. 6k of those were not usable at all so 5K have been used this year to replace broken equipment for ES and HS.
2. This years $6.5M actually pays for the annual Google Software license for all laptops, at ~ 25 per machine, so so the remainder of $5.25M and $2.5M has been pulled out of the operating budget and being funded by existing excess capital surplus.
3. Chromebooks have a 3-hear useful life and we have stretched that to 5 years with the replacements available. This year we will replace all of the HS Chromebooks, and again, we will retain the usable machines as replacements primarily for ES.
4. If we don’t get these replacements, as Chromebooks break down (which they do by the thousands - thank your IT staff when you get a chance) we will quickly run out of replacements. The cost in time and $$ to repair a Chromebook quickly exceeds the $400+ cost to purchase one, and we will be coming back to ask for more to replace / repair very soon.

Now let’s talk about whether we NEED these and this is required or whether we can just do without.

1. Like it or not, the state REQUIRES a WCS-owned computer to do testing. While this alone doesn’t necessitate 1:1, we would have to have nearly 1:1 in order to complete testing during state-allowed testing window.
2. At the HS level, we have Schoology, Skyward, online textbooks and a ton of apps that students use regularly. Given the reality of #1, I’m not sure there is a way around having a Chromebook for every student.
3. I’ve expressed concerns over the (over) usage and reliance on computers and the time our students spend on them during and outside of class as more and more assignments are driven by online activities. THAT is a conversation that we can and will have.
4. Also on the table, is next year’s Chromebook request to replace ES Chromebooks, and staff is already evaluating the concern that 1:1 computers for especially K-2 may not be necessary.

Bottom line, this is not a discretionary item. Along with the other $16M of required costs over and above last year’s budget and after targeted eliminations of positions and cost, we have $20.7M of costs that must be paid before we have funds available for raises for teachers and staff. We are still $10.2M short and need your help convincing the County Commission to find a way to fund our complete $555M budget request.

05/22/2024

Herein contains an email Commission Sturgeon sent to all WCS Board Members and County Commissioners today, along with my in-line response. My views do not reflect the views of or speak for the WCS Board, but as this email was sent to all, I feel obligated to provide a counterpoint to demonstrate the view of a WCS Board member. I look forward to continued to discussions with the members of the Commission, WCS Board, and engagement from the community as we work together to balance the 24-25 County Budget and fully fund the budget needs of WCS, which are currently $555M, and I fully support finding creative ways for doing so without a tax increase if that is the will of the majority of the Commission.

[entire text is below but formatting is not better in the pdf to see my comments in-line]

Comm Sturgeon: School Board Members,
As a member of the funding body who will vote on your WCS Budget I felt that it is important to follow up my comments to you last night regarding your budget since I was unable to contain my complete message to you in the 60 seconds that was allowed me to speak. Thank you for taking the time to consider my thoughts.
1.
Comm Sturgeon: I believe almost everyone agrees that teacher's salaries need to be raised and I hope the board chooses to make teachers 6% pay raises their #1 budget priority.
WCSB Galbreath: WCS has several items that must be done this year, including purchasing textbooks, providing for annual raises for teacher “roll”, increases in insurance costs, increases in utilities and janitorial services, funding teachers for new computer science state requirement, and replacement of 5-year-old Chromebooks for high schools. The recruitment and retention of our teachers and staff is a key tenet of our Strategic Plan, and it is providing a pay raise to all of our employees, consistent with the agreement between Mayor Anderson and Superintendent Golden in February before we began our public budget discussions.
2.
Comm Sturgeon: We both know it is WCS and the School Board that set these funding priorities not the County Commission. I hope you decide teacher's salaries are more important than let's say technology?
WCSB Galbreath: We are all clear on the distinction of the roles of the County Commission and the WCS Board. WCS determines the funds that are required to operate the schools and the County Commission determines the amount that they are willing to fund. The Mayor typically provides guidance to the Superintendent, around the raise and general growth rate of the county budget and the expectations for WCS. In some years, it is zero raises and zero growth outside of positions required due to student growth. This year, the Mayor and Superintendent agreed on pursuing a 6% across the board raise for all county employees, including WCS, and WCS was informed of what is now a required $5.57M increase in the cost of insurance.
3.
Comm Sturgeon: Threatening teacher's salary increases is bad for morale. It’s a bad strategy for staying competitive in acquiring and retaining the best teachers. Please don't do that.
WCSB Galbreath: I have not heard from WCS Board threatening teacher raises. We are committed to providing a $16.8M raise to WCS employees as indicated by the $555M budget we passed last night to send back to the County Commission. If the Commission does not provide the full $555M, then we will have to make cuts somewhere. Unfortunately, there are $20.7M of expenses that we have to fund before we get to 6% raise.
4.
Comm Sturgeon: Towards the goal of acquiring and retaining the best teachers, you could adopt a different pay scale. One where administrators making over $100,000/yr would get smaller than 6 percent salary increases. The money saved could be used to pay rank and file teachers more.
WCSB Galbreath: This definitely doesn’t reflect any vote by the WCS Board, but I have proposed that we address our biggest staffing need, SPED TA’s, and other positions at the lower end of the scale and will continue to discuss how we allocate the $16.8M pay raise. That includes reviewing the impact of providing a slightly lower raise for those at the top of the pay scale, as well as increased stipends for our arts teachers. It must be noted that we must retain our administrators as well as our teachers, so providing them no raise is not an option. Also, the impact of the 6% of WCS employees making >$120k is only $500k of the $16.8M, so I'm not advocating for eliminating it, but even if it was eliminated it would close only 5% of the $10.2M current budget gap.
5.
Comm Sturgeon: The Budget Committee this year recommended a budget that required no property tax increase. ALL other county departments tightened their budgets and were able to provide a 6% pay increase to their employees while staying within the guidelines set by the County Commission.
WCSB Galbreath: Based on what I reviewed from the Budget Committee and the County Commission Budget, the County Budget is being balanced by reducing the general fund by $13M. I’m just a WCS Board member and Williamson County Resident, and it appears that the county is adding 21 positions this year (2% of its staff) and a total increase of $6M, which is a 7.8% increase in salaries over 23-24. Other costs are going up $2.4M or 3.2%. It appears that the County General Fund was at $104M at the end of FY 2023 and went down $18M to $86M this year and is proposed to be reduced down to $73M in FY 2025.
6.
Comm Sturgeon: This year The Budget Committee voted to recommend a 5% increase for Williamson County schools, allowing for a total of $545M not the $555 million before you tonight.
WCSB Galbreath: The Budget Committee didn’t vote to give WCS a 5% increase, it voted to leave the property tax rate at $1.09, the same as 23-24, which resulted in a 5% increase. In a prior vote, before needing to set the tax rate, I believe the budget committee agreed with the $555M.
7.
Comm Sturgeon: Based on last year’s Budget of $517M. This $28M increase provides adequate funding for the WCS raises, totaling $16.7M.
WCSB Galbreath: WCS has required spending, net of 28 eliminated positions and the reduction of over $1M of operating costs, of $20.7M. Continuing to insinuate that somehow there is $10M of waste or excess in the WCS budget to fund all of our obligations as well as the $16.8M raise is disingenuous, particularly when the county is funding its salary increase and increase of 22 positions through a $13M reduction of fund balance.
8.
Comm Sturgeon: Williamson County taxpayers fund a whopping 71% of the WCS budget with the state funding the difference, compared to other counties that only fund 11-30%. So I would argue that the County Commission has and is strongly supporting and fully funding our schools. I wish some of you would stop telling or implying to our constituents otherwise. Approximately 75% of the county budget pays for schools.
WCSB Galbreath: The state funding formula under the BEP and TISA dictates that Williamson County provide a majority of funding for schools. To the credit of the Mayor and County Commission, our county has been extremely frugal on non-school spending while keeping taxes low and keeping per pupil spending and teacher salaries near the state average.
9.
Comm Sturgeon: This month the Commission passed a resolution sponsored by Commissioners Torres, Morton, Webb and myself, asking the state to do better in funding education in Williamson County. So the County Commission is doing their part while respecting taxpayers, and they’re hard earned dollars. Not everyone in Williamson County is rich.
WCSB Galbreath: I don’t speak for the WCS Board, but if the Commission asked the Board to weigh in on asking the state to revisit the funding formula to the benefit of Williamson County, I’m sure we could be united in that stand. I’m open to appealing to the state about funding the Cost Differential Factor (CDF), which was phased out during the final years of BEP and has not been funded in TISA, as well as make the switch of the ability to pay formula completely to CBER as promised. Your presumption with your last statement is that by requesting $555M, the WCS Board doesn’t respect taxpayers and they’re (sic) hard earned dollars, when in reality, the County Commission has several options to fully fund our obligations, including a full $16.8M raise without a tax increase.
10.
Comm Sturgeon: I’m sure by now you’re all aware that Rutherford County Schools is educating about 25% more students on a budget that’s pretty much equivalent to what the Williamson County Budget Committee has approved funding for, $545 million. Additionally, RCS pays their teachers more than WCS. RCS is still one of the fastest growing districts in the state where enrollment here in Williamson has been relatively flat these past 3 years. You may not want to be compared to Rutherford. I agree with you there’s significant differences between us and them. But you can be sure teachers are doing that comparison. There’s value in doing a comparison of
our
two budgets. WCSB Galbreath: I’m sure you heard the reality of how Rutherford and Williamson Counties are different. Mostly related to the federal funding that Rutherford receives (~$40M more). If you want to help make our teachers’ salaries on par or greater than Rutherford, I’m happy to have a discussion on how to make that happen.
11.
Comm Sturgeon: Has the school board done a line-by-line review, comparing our budget with other comparable counties to see where cost saving opportunities can be found? When was the last time an independent audit was done on the budget by a 3rd party looking for opportunities for cost savings? I would like to know why Rutherford’s medical insurance is so much cheaper. I understand after I left the meeting school board members were saying an audit was already done by the TN comptroller. Obviously, this is not the type of audit being called for. The comptroller does not look for cost savings.
WCSB Galbreath: Our staff does a detailed review of the budget annually. This year, they identified 28 positions to eliminate and over $1M of operating cost savings. Rutherford County’s medical insurance is likely not cheaper, but it is likely that they pass more of the cost along to its employees than does Williamson County. In your request for an audit, that coincidentally was also requested by one of our school board members, do you know the cost of such an audit or who would perform it. And are you proposing that such an audit be performed on ALL county departments, including those for which the County Commission has operational authority or only for those under the operating authority of the WCS Board?
12.
Comm Sturgeon: Why has WCS ignored the most recent vote by the Budget Committee and put the $555 million budget back to the board instead of the $545 which will be published in the local paper? WCSB Galbreath: The WCS decision to put forth the $555M budget back to the Commission reflects the understanding that the Budet Commitee voted 3-2 and the Education Committee voted 3-3, but we would like to provide the entire County Commission the opportunity to find a way to fund the entire $555M budget.
13.
Comm Sturgeon: Over the next year or so the county is going to be faced with several big capital projects, including an adult jail & juvenile jail plus administration and Sheriff's Office, which will more than likely mean a significant tax increase. WCSB Galbreath: Thanks for the heads up. I for one would love to see a multi-year capital plan for the county, similar to the 5-year capital plan that WCS provides annually to the Commission. In addition, it would be fantastic to see all departments and the Commission start to do a multi-year operating plan to help the Commission plan for future needs.
14.
Comm Sturgeon: With that in mind, I believe there needs to be evidence to our county taxpayers that a concerted initiative has been done to identify cost savings
within the school budget. 75% of the total county budget. This would respect the
county’s taxpayers while ultimately protecting teacher's salary raises.
WCSB Galbreath: I have demonstrated the results of the WCS staff review during this budget cycle. I would appreciate any evidence of any staff and expense reductions on the non- school-related county departments as well as an accounting for how the county fund balance has reduced from $104M to $73M in 2 years.

Respectfully,
Barbara Sturgeon
Respectully,
Jay Galbreath, WCSB District 6

Address

1611 Wilson Pike
Brentwood, TN
37027

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Jay Galbreath, Williamson County School Board District 6 posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Jay Galbreath, Williamson County School Board District 6:

Share