09/01/2026
Texans asked them to stop.
The Senate asked them to stop. The House asked them to stop. The Lieutenant Governor asked them to stop. The Attorney General asked them to stop.
And administrative law judges found one major 765-kV pathway had not even been proven necessary.
For months, hundreds of Texas landowners and ratepayers, including multigenerational farmers and ranchers, traveled to Austin repeatedly to testify before the Senate, House and Public Utility Commission (PUC).
Lawmakers listened.
State Sen. Kevin Sparks and Rep. Brad Buckley asked the PUC to delay final decisions until after the 90th Legislature could review the massive cost and impact on thousands of Texas landowners. They also asked ERCOT to reconsider the need in light of the tremendous amount of new natural-gas generation being proposed in Texas.
And 43 Texas legislators, including 34 House members and 9 senators, formally filed an amicus brief supporting American Stewards of Liberty’s request to defer the determination of need for the 765-kV buildout.
Senate Business & Commerce Chairman Dr. Charles Schwertner called on the PUC to DENY the pending 765-kV applications. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick agreed, saying the current process is “broken and must be reformed.”
Attorney General Ken Paxton filed his own amicus curiae brief supporting a pause until the Legislature can review the costs, private-property impacts and appropriate guardrails.
One point from his brief deserves attention:
“No version of HB 5066 makes any mention of 765-kV lines.”
And now there is another major development.
SOAH administrative law judges recommended DENIAL of the Bell County East-to-Big Hill project after finding the utilities failed to prove Import Path 2 is necessary. They also found problems with notice and participation for affected landowners.
American Stewards of Liberty’s (ASL) Margaret Byfield said it best:
“Private property should never be condemned for a project that has not been proven necessary.”
Yet the PUC approved two other 765-kV cases on August 28, and final orders have now been issued.
ASL says it will seek rehearing and prepare for the next stage in court.
Hundreds of Texans showed up. Bipartisan lawmakers spoke up. The Attorney General stepped in. Administrative law judges found a major pathway had not been proven necessary.
So why are we rushing forward?
Before billions are spent and private property is permanently burdened, Texans deserve proof of need, due process and legislative accountability.
READ MORE:
43 Texas Legislators Amicus Brief:https://interchange.puc.texas.gov/search/documents/?controlNumber=59029&itemNumber=465
AG Paxton:https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-supports-pause-765-kv-transmission-line-buildout-pending-legislative
American Stewards of Liberty:https://americanstewards.us/judges-recommend-denial-of-key-texas-765-kv-transmission-line/
Buckley/Sparks filinghttps://interchange.puc.texas.gov/Documents/59336_2598_1667371.PDF