Judge Matthew Williams successfully landed a job at the ‘Auburn Justice Center’ as a community judge, a position thereby obligating him to afford good and caring public service, within a wholeheartedly-honest and reasonable capacity... https://www.facebook.com/AuburnJusticeCenter.WA/about/?ref=page_internal
Judge Matthew Williams successfully landed a job at the ‘Auburn Justice Center’ as a judge
, whereby he is thereby obligated to properly serve our local community within the capacity of behaving responsibly, and rendering sound verdicts. While he (presumably?) enjoys serving within this position, he likewise most definitely enjoys receiving his taxpayer-funded paycheck, afforded him under the auspices that he is in fact properly serving his local community, within the capacity of his current role as a judge. Unfortunately however, it appears as though judge Williams may have been intending to “pioneer” a new type of so called “public service,” consisting of his apparent preference to evaluate and conclude upon some cases within a capacity which seemingly happens to be, most convenient for his immediate, personal interests of expediency. In other words, “to hell with being responsible, and acting properly…” Based upon one recent, (perpetrated) action of his part against (and, to the detriment of) a fellow member of his local community, judge Williams quite apparently has no misgivings whatsoever in relation to the prospect of our justice system unfairly victimizing predominantly innocent citizens, so long as such instances occur within the capacity (under his watch) of the seemingly apparent outcome which may potentially, happen to most-limit the extent of his further-involvement and thus time expenditure…
As judge Williams (based upon this one, cited instance) apparently only cares about the prospect of “smoothing his job along,” and making things a little bit easier for himself -his primary, intended outcome is not that of ultimate justice, respect for individual’s rights and fair treatment of citizens on the part of government, but rather (quite apparently?) appears to be something very different entirely… In relation to this we may potentially only speculate, however some believe his motivation for apparently holding such a perspective may relate to his personal interest in effective “stress management,” in relation to his occupationally-experienced and job-related stresses… (Now, to address judge 'worthless Williams' directly:) “Surely (judge Williams?,) such seemingly self-centered and unworthy considerations as these, must surely, deservedly supersede any societal need, for you to behave properly and responsibly, within your currently-enjoyed role? Might you potentially agree, ‘judge Williams?’”
Now, once again for purposes of clarification, as for why judge Williams seemingly doesn’t really care all that much in relation to the prospect of rendering citizen-respecting, “fair justice” (as illustrated by the one apparently-malfeasant event cited,) we really can only speculate… We surely however, do not wish to be potentially unfair to judge Williams, regardless of the extent to which he may have undeservedly perpetrated unfairness on the part of government (mind you?,) against other, generally-innocent citizens? Now, considering judge Williams seemingly cares so little as for the prospect of following through with previously agreed upon, state-perpetrated extortion schemes whereby, upon payment of the full applicable “penalty,” the supposed “crime” is then removed from the defendant’s record, it surely must be no surprise that judge Williams seemingly must have some inward inclination that predispositions him to not wish to conduct business “honestly,” in making good on the general intent associated with the previously-agreed upon extortion schemes, in following through with the applicable, intended promise (of removing the supposed transgression from public record) even in the event that one of his (justice system’s) (defendant) victims was for some reason unable to pay in full, by the court-imposed deadline? Might such a victim’s(?) inability to pay in full by the specified day, actually deserve to necessitate the defendant (victim) essentially being “scammed” in relation to a subsequent court-imposed penalty, and not being offered in return what was initially promised them? Unfortunately, it does appear (quite undoubtedly,) that judge Williams (of the ‘Auburn Justice Center’) does in fact believe whole-heartedly in this philosophy, at least to the extent that it makes his own job just a little bit easier. In other words, ‘judge Williams’ really, seemingly doesn’t care all that much about conducting government, court-related business within an entirely honest capacity… In his eyes, the (essentially, quite innocent?) subject may not actually deserve to be afforded the result promised in exchange for payment of the applicable penalty, simply in cases where such happens to occur just a little bit late due to the defendant’s financial inability to pay immediately… Rather, ‘judge Williams’ (of the ‘Auburn Justice Center,’) in fact actually believes that a person’s inability to pay by the court-imposed deadline does in fact deserve to provide sufficient cause for the state in not following through with its original, promised action in relation to the original agreement made (consisting of record removal, of the supposedly-applicable transgression.) Unfortunately, ‘judge Williams’ of the Auburn Justice Center apparently believes that the state still deserves to be entitled to collect and essentially “steal” the full-extorted amount, even in these unfortunate instances where it deliberately exercises its supposed “right” to dishonestly not fulfill its end of the agreed-upon bargain, in citing the technicality of the defendant having been too financially disadvantaged to pay in full by the specified, court-imposed deadline. Some of us believe in honesty, transparency, government responsibility, fair practices and accountability… I am very sorry to need to announce here, that (in relation to this particular case) we seemingly have quite well-substantiated evidence to conclude that ‘judge Williams,’ of the ‘Auburn Justice Center’ in fact believes very little in anything of the sort… This may, potentially lead one to wonder as for “where the hell, did his apparent non-belief in the concept of government honesty,” potentially come from? Furthermore, how the hell did this lousy piece of non-serving garbage, come to be employed at our local ‘Auburn Justice Center?’ Might this worthless piece of public filth, not actually deserve to be held publicly accountable for his morally-deficient nature? –I’m very sorry, “your dishonorable, ‘worthless Williams’” however I in fact actually believe quite truly in the universally-accepted values of honesty and personal accountability… Whereas, you quite apparently do not. I’m very sorry, your dishonorable “worthless Williams,” however I am quite afraid that you really should be “taking a hike” at this point, and hopefully not returning to your currently-enjoyed position of perpetrating public “non-service,” against others in our community. I bet, that this “worthless Williams” may truly believe, that he does not actually deserve to be held publicly accountable for this particular, perpetrated instance of societal malfeasance… In regard to this potential objection (on the part of judge ‘worthless Williams,’) I may have the following to say: “I’m very sorry, your ‘worthless Williams,’ however I am afraid that I may in fact, seriously disagree. For this reason your ‘worthless Williams,’ we shall now lay out publicly, a few details of the case against you in relation to this single, applicable-perpetrated societal transgression”:
For information purposes, and for the sake of the audience the particular situation which provoked the creation of this page, in order to publicly-illustrate the seemingly most relevant character aspects of the (previously mentioned) ‘Auburn Justice Center’ judge, ‘worthless Williams,’ is the following particular transgression of this judge as may be illustrated in the following matter:
Judge ‘worthless Williams,’ decided that the state does not actually deserve to be obligated to fulfill its promised obligation in the instance of its commonly-made agreements (with defendants) whereby the state is to “defer” (remove from record) the supposed, applicable transgression after two years upon the defendant’s “payment in full,” of the court-imposed fine in instances where it took the defendant more than two years, to come up with sufficient funds… Judge ‘worthless Williams’ quite apparently believes, that in instances where the defendant was so financially disadvantaged (or potentially even, disabled?) so as to be unable to pay in full by the applicable deadline, not even a subsequent instance of “paying in full” deserves to obligate the state to fulfill its end of the bargain, by his (judge Williams) simply utilizing as an excuse the defendant’s financially disadvantaged (or potentially even, disabled?) status as may have precluded them from paying on time. Although ‘Auburn Justice Center’ judge ‘worthless Williams’ believes in denying fulfillment of the agreed-upon state’s obligation in such instances, judge ‘worthless Williams’ furthermore apparently believes that the state still deserves to collect in full, its (essentially, dishonestly-extorted?) revenues even while offering absolutely nothing in return, and not even that which was previously agreed-upon? How could an ‘Auburn Justice Center’ judge potentially be in favor of such a seemingly dishonest means of our government doing business, especially under his watch? Unfortunately, in relation to this particular inquiry it may very well be necessary, to inquire upon judge ‘worthless Williams’ directly… However, we unfortunately are unable to guarantee his availability for comment, especially considering his demonstrated contempt in relation to such principles as honesty, and the prospect of government treating citizens fairly. Now, for a further description of the applicable matter, which had provoked the creation of this highly deserved page in relation to ‘Auburn Justice Center (of Auburn, WA)’ judge ‘worthless Williams’... The following letter was submitted to the ‘Auburn Justice Center,’ and assigned to judge ‘worthless Williams’ (most, quite unfortunately?) The letter details the nature of the situation encountered, and requests that a reasonable resolution be provided. Unfortunately, judge ‘worthless Williams’ in fact provided for absolutely nothing of the sort… Although be it, that the applicable situation at hand did not even deserve the degree of government involvement (as well as the subsequent, unjustified citizen-victimization) which had resulted. The initial letter, requesting correction of the applicable injustice (as well as describing the initial, causing circumstance) immediately follows, and is thereafter proceeded by a potential, conceived (but still preliminary,) possible letter to this ‘worthless judge Williams,’ of the ‘Auburn Justice Center’ of Auburn, WA:
For purposes of clarification, the following, previously-afforded statement may no longer be applicable, therefore this previously-removed content is hereby now reinstated within the content of this page, whereby the following message had previously appeared in its place:
[This content is currently unavailable, as a need was determined to remove information that may potentially be personally-identifiable until a proper resolution is achieved for this individual case.]
Previously-removed, but now reinstated applicable content:
4/18/2013
[from address]
Auburn Justice Center
340 E Main St. Ste. 101
Auburn, WA 98002
Your Honor,
I am currently on public assistance, and I very much wish to get off of these public assistance programs and to become more self-reliant with full time employment. I have been unemployed for quite a number of months, but was just recently granted a conditional job offer by an employment agency, contingent upon the completion of a successful background check. Although I am an extremely honest and generally law abiding citizen, it has come to my understanding that a seemingly unfortunate disposition has since been applied to my record, relating to a little “mishap” which happened one night at the Muckleshoot Casino more than two years ago. Unfortunately, I threw up and for this reason I was asked to leave the casino. As a responsible citizen, I was definitely not going to drive away while intoxicated, so I instead decided to take a walk down the street. An hour later, still not feeling sufficiently comfortable to drive, I returned to the casino, sat down and resumed watching the show. I was then questioned by casino personnel if I was the one who had thrown up earlier, and I replied “yes.” I was escorted out, upon which time I was then handcuffed, arrested and taken to jail by Auburn police. I was furthermore issued a criminal trespass citation ( ********,) which I felt was quite undeserved considering the circumstances. In exchange for allowing this situation “off the hook” so to speak, the city of Auburn apparently felt that I deserved to pay a $700+ dollar fine, which was difficult for me due to my then unemployed status. I did manage to secure some employment for about a month, which allowed me to pay off more than half of the $700+ dollar fine, over a period of time. Unfortunately however, the employment did not last long enough for me to be able to pay off all of the fine in its entirety, before the court-imposed deadline. I do apologize for this, I was trying to make the payments, but simply ran out of money and was unable to make the minimum payments. I did however, intend to pay the remaining balance when I became able. Unfortunately however this did not occur before the court-imposed deadline of September, 2012. Other than for a few short-term jobs, I have been unemployed for over a year, but have been seeking suitable work. I specialize in the area of call center technical support, and have been having some trouble finding a job in this area. Fortunately, an opportunity was recently presented me, for employment within such a capacity. I can’t do heavy lifting or a lot of physical activity, which limits the nature of the jobs I am capable of doing. Again I am a very honest and generally law abiding citizen and have an entirely clean record, free of any criminal convictions, except (apparently,) for this matter I am addressing with you here today. Although I don’t personally consider the nature of my apparent crime of throwing up at Muckleshoot, being asked to leave and then returning one hour later (due to not feeling comfortable to drive,) to be all that much of a crime I did nevertheless make a good faith effort to pay the imposed $700+ dollar fine, and I paid it to the extent I was able. Unfortunately, I was unable to pay all of it before the court-imposed September, 2012 deadline. As I mentioned, I have been unemployed for quite some period of time, and was fortunate enough to have recently been afforded a conditional job offer, contingent upon the successful completion of a background check. This is the good news. The bad news is, that the employment agency has informed me that in order for me to be granted this job opportunity, I must first resolve this “revoked deferral” matter, as it appears on my record. Had I not previously been so financially disadvantaged, paying the remaining $313 before September of 2012 would not have been a problem and I would not currently find myself in this position I am in today, of needing to seek your further assistance in resolving this matter. My parents also, like me, are very much interested in my gaining suitable employment, and thereby becoming able to abandon this present fate to which I am seemingly now resigned, consisting of my dependency upon government assistance. I really don’t personally like being a “taker,” at the expense of taxpayers and would simply prefer to enjoy suitable employment. Again, I’ve been unemployed for quite a number of months, and in consideration of me being afforded this recent conditional job offer, my parents have generously volunteered to help me cover the remaining $313 dollar balance owed, so that my record will hopefully become cleared and thereby enable me to accept this job. The employment agency which made me the offer, is seemingly willing to give me about a week or so to try to get this matter resolved. I ask that you please reinstate the previously-granted deferral, which had been revoked solely for the reason of my being unable to pay, due to my financially disadvantaged status. I really would like to get a job in my field, and no longer have to rely upon public assistance. Regards,
–(Complainant )
Prior to the supposed decision being rendered, I was informed (upon stopping by, and inquiring) that my letter had been assigned to ‘judge Matthew Williams.’ A few days later, I received his apparently-dictated response by mail:
King County District Court
State of Washington
South Division – Auburn Courthouse
340 E Main Street, STE 101
Auburn, WA 98002
Call Center Information Number: 206-205-9200
South Division Auburn Courthouse (206) 205-9200
Fax: 206-296-0525
Matthew Williams, Judge Patricia Kohler, Director
Richard Bathum, Judge
May 7, 2013
[addressee name]
[address]
RE: C****** - Re-instatement of deferral
DearMr. *******,
Please be advised that your request to reinstate the deferral on the case listed above has been denied. Should you have any questions, please contact the court. Sincerely,
King County District Court
South Division – Auburn/mh
Potentially conceived, but not yet afforded “letter #2,” to ‘Auburn Justice Center’ judge, ‘worthless Williams’:
Judge Williams,
Unless you didn’t actually have the authority to resolve this situation, and were for some reason too incompetent to so advise me and provide a referral to the next point of escalation, I am quite afraid the following may deservingly be applicable:
You quite very well may be a despicable piece of self-absorbed human filth, potentially many times worse than the majority of your fellow citizens whom you pass judgment against. You are a wicked, evil piece of human filth who apparently believes the state has a legitimate role in unduly victimizing fellow citizens, in the course of ordinary events as may occur in their daily lives. You evil, self-absorbed and wicked filth, I have no doubt that you surely care about receiving your next taxpayer-funded paycheck, as compensation for your self-centered pursuit of your own wicked ways, in unduly victimizing fellow citizens residing in our community… However, you apparently have absolutely no concern whatsoever in relation to my ability (as one of your victims) to receive a privately-generated paycheck, as might be unduly disadvantaged on the part of our government (and, more specifically, …you.) Although I cannot speak to the degree of legitimacy surrounding the decisions you have made in relation to the (sometimes legitimate, and sometimes not) cases which have surely been brought against other fellow citizens in your court room, what I do know with absolute certainty is that you have most definitely perpetrated your wickedness upon me… As a supposed “public servant,” and someone who is in a position of authority you undoubtedly deserve to be held accountable for the undue, highly improper and thereby malfeasant results which you perpetrate against society and (particularly,) in this case me…In the capacity of this particular instance, you are most definitely not a public servant but rather a shameless facilitator of government-sponsored abuse of ordinary citizens, residing in our community. I would hope there may not be a huge number of others also residing within this same victimization category, as me... I am curious though, as for what your victim count might be? How many victims might there potentially be, and of what all, in relation to which might you be guilty? You wicked, evil human filth, I shall intend to hold you publicly accountable, by means of creating a publicly-viewable page for you, to illustrate your true, inward nature as may be determined upon the basis of this particular evil, wicked misdeed… You worthless piece of human filth, your public identity now resides at: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Judge-worthless-Williams-Auburn-Justice-Center-of-Auburn-WA/414651855300263. I am afraid, this may not look so good for either you, or the reputation of the ‘Auburn Justice Center?’
Now, I understand (you wicked, malfeasant piece of human filth) that you may very well at least somewhat object to the matter of me imposing upon you, some reasonable degree of public accountability… However (unfortunately for you, you evil filth) my “freedom of speech” rights are in fact protected by the first amendment of our U.S. constitution, something for which your value is likely quite doubtful. In any case however (you wicked filth,) everything stated about you on this page is in fact true, and therefore you, have absolutely no grounds whatsoever to potentially challenge the existence of such… Which consists, only of actual truth pertaining to you, as might reasonably be “judged” on the basis of your perpetrated malfeasance (in this particular instance,) as a public official. You wicked filth, do you not recall hearing that Jesus did in fact order of you, that “whatever you do unto the least of these, you do unto me?” You wicked filth, might you for some reason believe that you might somehow possibly be, above this seemingly reasonable standard of accountability? Wicked filth, do you actually believe, that you will not potentially be held accountable in relation to this instance of malfeasance which you have perpetrated against me? You wicked filth… I have already been unduly extorted out of $700+ dollars, complied with all other terms of the highly-undeserved penalties imposed against me, however you still believe that such deserves to preclude me, from getting a job? …That is, even though, had I been of sufficient wealth to pay the fine in full just a few months earlier, this undeserved “black mark” would not have appeared on my record according to the terms of the original extortion-type agreement that I was essentially forced to sign, due to the imposed non-availability of any more-reasonable options? I understand, that your ‘Auburn Justice Center’ may often decline to prosecute many “real” crimes… This includes crimes of dishonesty, which actually deserve to be prosecuted. I had my iPod stolen from me by someone whom I had extended the courtesy of affording a ride in my car… However, upon reporting the occurrence to Auburn police just a couple weeks later, I was informed by the officer that the prosecutor wouldn’t even bother to prosecute the case simply because, due to my working schedule I hadn’t managed to report it sooner? You worthless piece of self-absorbed human filth, you apparently care little as for any prospect of real “justice,” but are instead much more interested in simply making your own job just a little bit easier at the expense of (possibly, at times?) improperly victimizing fellow citizens of your community, within a highly undeserved capacity. The public surely deserves better. You wicked filth, had you had much of any moral basis to begin with, upon reading my letter and discovering the true nature of the original situation, you would have realized this was in fact a highly undeserved instance of inadvertent (or carelessly-perpetrated) government victimization against an extremely honest and generally law-abiding, fellow citizen… Had you potentially had any semblance of good character and general, societal concern you would have escalated the outrageous nature of this particular, government-perpetrated transgression among city and police leaders to help ensure that such injustices are not wrongly perpetrated by our local government in the future. You furthermore, considering the circumstances should have immediately removed any trace of this undue charge from my record, refunded all of the improperly-extorted fine (for the sake of honesty,) and potentially considered as to how to compensate me for having been so needlessly victimized by the City of Auburn. Instead, you were such a malfeasant, self-centered and worthless piece of human filth, that you didn’t even afford me the courtesy of removing the (highly) undeserved charge from my record, pursuant to the original terms of the extortion agreement which dictated that such would occur after two years upon payment of the fine, and satisfaction of all other terms (in relation to which I had complied, other than simply being unable to pay the entire balance on-time.) You worthless piece of self-absorbed human filth, you have unduly denied me any reasonable degree of justice relating to this particular matter presented you, and furthermore were apparently too incompetent or unconcerned to even bother explaining why. In holding your present position of authority, you undoubtedly had a moral obligation to afford me much better. How would you feel (you worthless filth,) if you were to someday be denied entrance into the kingdom of heaven? I personally don’t have a whole lot of doubt, that Satan may potentially welcome your admittance along with him, into the kingdom of hell? Bottom line, you worthless filth: You are not a public servant, but in fact actually are an absolutely worthless piece of self-absorbed, human filth and may very well be many times worse than the majority of public subjects whom you pass judgment against. Malfeasance, on the part of someone in authority (particularly, in the capacity of utilizing the force of government to unduly perpetrate injustices upon others,) is most surely a seriously-greater transgression than the measly, minor other things which it may be your job to pass judgment against. Being a malfeasant and morally-bankrupt public official, you are guilty of a significantly greater atrocity than your average subjects you may encounter in your courtroom. You worthless filth, as you have seriously betrayed your proper fulfillment of public duty in unduly denying me, please do not be surprised if our ‘father in heaven’ decides to deny you admission into his kingdom. It would most definitely not surprise me if God deems worthless, self-centered and malfeasant public officials such as you, as not being worthy of enjoying the privilege of entering his kingdom. In any case however, I have little doubt, that Satan may very well be happy to accommodate you, …along with himself in the kingdom of hell should you not repent and turn from your wicked ways. Regards,
•
/
\
/
Notice:
This page was created as part of my personally-founded, "Public Accountability Project." All information contained herein is entirely true and correct to the fullest extent, and the existence of this page, as well as all publicly-available information which it contains is protected by the first amendment of our nation's constitution, guaranteeing "freedom of speech." Applicable law does provide slandered parties appropriate recourse in the event anything detrimental is attributed to them, which is not actually true. The fact of the matter is however, that all information (other than the listed "gender," being a rather obvious joke) contained here is in fact most entirely true; it is furthermore, thereby my perception that the guilty perpetrators named herein might very well have every reason to feel legitimately “shamed” out of pursuing any inclination they might otherwise have to contest, in a court of law the public availability of such information pertaining to them, which is in fact true. Further, corroborating documentation for such claims may or may not be made available upon request, and at my sole discretion (the only hesitancy I may have in providing such information, lies in the area of my concern for protecting those who have been so victimized from sustaining any further unnecessary and/or undue embarrassment.) Please know however, that such documentation does in any case exist and that no hesitation shall be afforded in presenting such as evidence in the event of any potential (but unlikely,) legal proceeding. Guilty perpetrators: If you have become aware of the existence of your associated community page, please know that it was created as a public service, for the benefit of our community. I personally ask that you please take this as an opportunity to recognize your evil attributes, and how such may have improperly disenfranchised others within the course of your lifetime. Hopefully you will learn something in order to better your character, such that you might become a more honest, reasonable, caring and/or benevolent leader in the future. Again, it is my belief that the public indeed has a legitimate right to know about poor character attributes as may exist and be manifested among those who occupy positions of authority within our society, whether it be government or otherwise. My personally-founded, "Public Accountability Project" is intended to hold guilty, societal perpetrators publicly accountable for their applicable misdeeds, and to promote honest, ethical and reasonable future leadership decisions.
