Friends of Bay City Creek, Ashland, Wisconsin

Friends of Bay City Creek, Ashland, Wisconsin The Friends of Bay City Creek facebook group was formed to promote interest in a small urban north-flowing waterway that flows through Ashland, WI.

07/03/2020

Happy fourth of july everyone. Remember to protect the creek

How's everyone
06/04/2020

How's everyone

02/17/2020

Emily Stone visited Lake Superior Elementary School and taught students how to go out into nature and write about it afterward.

Good medicine
01/28/2020

Good medicine

THE SACRED ART OF NATIVE BODY PAINTING

In Native American cultures, paint was power—spiritual power, physical power. And the act of body painting was a sacred act, like a prayer to the creator or to nature to unify strength and spirit, hopes and visions. It was a prayer for survival too, in battle, in hunting, for the well-being of family members, or the tribe. Sometimes painting honored the dead or the brave, gave thanks, or celebrated personal, family or tribal milestones. Paint was used to conjure strength, as the mighty Shawnee Chief Tecumseh appeared with his warriors in full war paint before the future President of the United States to inspire fear as he tried to build a massive native confederation against invading whites.

Although the symbolism of body painting and war paint was not monolithic across native cultures, there were some broad prevalent themes. The most common link was the belief of kinship with nature, the earth and all its animals, and the conviction that nature imparted a vital power in the paints that was transferred to the wearer. The earliest materials were derived from animals, plants or mineral sources. Colors held significant meanings:

RED symbolized strength in battle and hunting, power, success. And because hunting and success in battle meant survival of the tribe, it also symbolized happiness and beauty. Red paints were made from iron oxides, roots, berries, beets, and ochre.
BLACK, made from charcoal mixed with bear grease or other liquid, was the color of battle and meant strength, coup in battle, and returning to camp victorious. Sometimes, black could mean mourning. The Crow blackened their face to show the fire of revenge had been vanquished with their enemy.
WHITE was the color of peace, prosperity, safety. But it could also mean mourning. Made from gypsum, limestone, clay, eggshells or seashells. Pawnee scouts painted their faces white to acquire the hunting power of the wolf.
GREEN, not surprisingly, was the color of nature, of harmony, of survival, and healing. Made from moss, flowers, berries, algae, or copper ore.
BLUE was associated with the sky and water, and evoked wisdom and confidence, hope. It was created often from duck manure, but also sunflower seeds, flowers, or oxides.
YELLOW had different meanings. It could mean death and that the warrior was willing to fight to the death. It also symbolized intelligence, a strong heart and that the warrior lived a good life. In the Southwest, yellow was created from the Bixa shrub near Mexico. Plains Indians used buffalo gallstones to produce yellow.
PURPLE was associated with magic, mystery, and spiritual power and was not generally used for battle or hunting, but by shaman and medicine men and women for spiritual ceremonies. Blueberries, coneflowers, and wild hibiscus were used for purple pigments.

Very early on, native tribes began to trade with fur traders and valued certain pigments that they could provide. The Osage, Omaha, Ponca, and Quapaw traded in the mid-1600s near St. Louis for Chinese vermilion, a very bright mercury sulfide face paint. They also traded looking glasses, which enabled tribe members to paint themselves. Previous to having mirrors, they relied on painting each other and regarding their reflection in water.

Face painting and war paint is a vibrant contemporary art among Native tribes today and showcased especially at powwows. Many of the ancient ancestral symbols have taken on new and powerful meaning in contemporary Native culture. For example, photo #14, symbolizing the return of the warrior, today is used to honor Native American veterans who have returned from war in the U.S. military.

For a related post, see NFTF’s June 11th entry, “INDIAN HAIR STYLES.” (Just scroll down past FRONTIER FREAK SHOWS & HOLLYWOOD HORSES! If you get to OUTHOUSES & ELECTRIC CORSETS, you’ve gone too far! 🙂 )

PHOTOS: (1) Early frontier illustrator George Catlin’s portrait of The White Cloud, head chief of the Iowa tribe (1845) National Gallery of Art, Washington DC. Red was a favored color of the Iowa and many Plains Indians. The painted hand across the chief’s mouth signified his success in hand-to-hand combat. (2) Algonquin traditional war paint used red, black and white geometric designs with vivid effect. Red and black were both colors of war and victory. Hail symbolized a prayer for misfortune on the enemy. (3) George Catlin’s 1832 depiction of Nez Perce brave, Rabbit Skin Leggings, in full regalia, painted red war paint, magnificently feathered and beaded and with a dramatic upright roach atop his head. (4) A modern Nez Perce brave echoes the traditional trappings of his ancestors. (5) An 1899 photograph of Oglala Sioux brave, Last Horse, in full war paint. (6) A scene from the PBS series Jamestown, about the early American frontier and the Pamunkey, the first federally recognized Indian tribe in Virginia and descendants of the Powhatan, Pocahontas’s tribe. The Pamunkey often painted their bodies in swaths of red and green. (7) Traditional Mohican war paint. A white line painted across the face with spikes on either side sometimes symbolized tusks of a bear. (8) The famous native actor, Wes Studi, in Last of the Mohicans, dressed in full war regalia, with magnificent roach, and shaved head painted red, white and black. Movies like Last of the Mohicans, Dances with Wolves, Little Big Man, and the PBS series, Jamestown, have brought attention to historical accuracy of Native adornment. (9) A Zuni brave of the Pueblo tribe in the Zuni River Valley in New Mexico.(10) A Cherokee warrior and his horse. War ponies were adorned in paint as elaborate as their riders. A circle around a horse’s eye enabled the horse to foresee danger. (11-20) Native American painting symbols. (11) Sun & earth represent harmony & balance in spirit and the natural world. (12) Shaman Eye represents knowledge, north, south, east & west & the spirit world inside (13) Crossed arrows meant war (14) Return of the warrior. This symbol is used today for returning Native veterans of the U.S. military. (15) Success in hand combat (16) Star symbol indicated gallantry or other major life accomplishments (17) Hoofmarks signified a successful horse raid on the enemy (18) Four stages of life: childhood, youth, middle age, and wisdom of old age (19) Lightning symbolizes the Thunderbird to bring power and speed to the warrior (20) Hail to rain down damage on the enemy and defeat them.

11/25/2019

ASAP's Mentorship Program

11/06/2019

The 7th Generation Amendment
by Walt Bresette, Lake Superior Greens, 7th Generation Committee

State and national legislatures are gutting environmental laws in a misguided effort to in response to the populist "wise use" movement and their corporate backers. The momentum is strong as the political pendulum swings against the earth.

The movement focuses on market value of private property, arguing that environmental laws are unfairly devaluing private property. A too narrow, yet effective, campaign in today's political atmosphere.

Once a fringe group, the "wise use" folks are now one of the new darlings of Congress. While some want private property owners to be compensated, others seek to remove any environmental law or regulation over private property.

Fortunately, the 5th Amendment to the US Constitution provides for some compensation. However, if the private property movement, fueled by corporate interests, have found safe haven, who is defending common property—that which provides the basis of life for all of us?

Where in the Constitution is air and water and ecosystems protected? We have an obligation to act, and our great grandchildren have a right to inherit our wealth, which certainly means more than a balanced budget.

In this rush to shore up private property rights, we are throwing out the baby with the bathwater. The short term solution for some creates an even greater and long term problem for us all. A fairer solution is to protect all property.

The taking of common property through abuse of private property use should be as illegal as the opposite.
Currently, common property-that, which by its nature, cannot be owned by an individual-is without protection. Yet, preservation of common property, such as air and water, are essential to all other rights.

Indeed, past environmental laws have had ambiguous constitutional authority; they were more common sense or common law. Some argue they are all reactionary, albeit necessary for the common good.

As effluents went beyond the fence line or smokestack or factory door, neighbors complained and rules and laws were promulgated. Necessary, but reactionary nonetheless. Today, when pitted against the clearer 5th Amendment protections, these laws and their protections are now endangered. Yet, the effluents continue and without regulation will increase, with very real impacts on health and habitat.

The challenge is to protect both, rather than getting rid of one at the expense of the other. In light of the obvious partisan politics afoot, what's needed is Constitutional balance, not more reactionary debate.

By adding to the definition of property we also broaden the concept of "takings," the term used in the private property debate. Common sense tells us that common property exists, and is being undermined, and needs protection, just as private property has protection.

7th Generation Amendment — Draft Language
The rights of the people to use and enjoy air, water, sunlight, and other renewable resources determined by Congress to be common property, shall not be impaired, nor shall such use impair their availability for the future generations.

The taking of common property through abuse of private property use should be as illegal as the opposite. Therefore we propose a Constitutional remedy which can provide these dual protections.

In revisiting the Constitution, we found no protection for common property. But we did find a that which, when married with new language, will provide protections. The basis, we think, is in the Preamble.

The Preamble states that these constitutional rights belong not just to us alive today but also to the future: "We the People of the United States . . . secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity." (Emphasis added.)

This Posterity clause clearly states that our descendants are guaranteed these "Blessings of Liberty." And we must infer that while we may use them today, we have no right to expend or damage them so that they are not available for the future. Rights were legally guaranteed for future generations. This was not a typographical error nor was it a superfluous filler. We intend to enliven this clause in our effort to assure the needed protections.

Thus, as we seek common property protections, we do so not just for today, as a momentary reaction to those in power, but we become constitutionally obligated to be caretakers for generations to come.

This different vision will enable us to see the consequences of our actions differently. By protecting rights for ourselves and for posterity we provide for the baby while changing the bath water.

Iroquois Chief Oren Lyons, in an interview with Bill Moyers, said that Benjamin Franklin turned to the Iroquois among others in trying to shape a better form of government. Apparently he listened and included elements of Iroquois governance including the concept of posterity.

Franklin's posterity, found in the Preamble, was the Iroquois concept of providing for the 7th generation. Chief Lyons said that as the Iroquois leaders contemplate policy they must always factor in how today's decision will affect the 7th generation into the future.

By simply attempting reform with what is available today, we remain in a stagnated "jobs vs. environment" polarization. In these complex times we must be more creative, yes proactive, and indeed accommodate all of our interests and rights, especially those yet to come.

To that end we, the 7th Generation Committee, have developed draft language which we think overcomes this dilemma. We call it the 7th Generation Amendment to the US Constitution. It was initially called the Common Property Amendment.

Our goal is to have a national debate beginning on Earth Day 1996, to have a bill before Congress on Earth Day 1997, and to get the necessary state ratifications by Earth Day 2000.

We chose Earth Day 2000 because half of those involved are youth who will turn 18 (voting age) on or after Earth Day 2000. The only criteria we ask of their participation is that they promise to vote.

If we adults refuse to look out for the future, the children of Generation M—the Millennial Generation—will rightfully set aside. In seven generations we will all be gone.

If we can rob from the poor to give to the rich ostensibly to balance the budget to prevent an unfair future economic burden, then surely we can commit the rest of our lives so that these same Great grandchildren will have the opportunity to breathe and drink safely.

And we must always remember, water is always more precious than gold.

7th Generation Timeline/Activities
Earth Day 1996-Environmental Fair for Youth, Benefit Concert for all, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; March/rally at State Capital, Madison, Wisconsin; national kick-off campaign.
The 7th Generation Committee will gladly send materials or visit your community regarding this campaign. And, of course, all donations are gladly accepted. For more information write the 7th Generation Committee, 1200 Ellis Avenue, Ashland, WI 54806; Committee members: Walt Bresette, 715/779-5071; Tom Busiahn, 715/682-3658; Jan Conley, 715/392-5782 or 218/726-1828; Robin Goree, 715/682-8848; Frank Koehn, 715/774-3333; Judy Pratt-Shelly, 715/779-3700.

Synthesis/Regeneration home page | S/R 9 Contents

11/06/2019

http://www.greens.org/s-r/09/09-19.html
The 7th Generation Amendment
by Walt Bresette, Lake Superior Greens, 7th Generation Committee

State and national legislatures are gutting environmental laws in a misguided effort to in response to the populist "wise use" movement and their corporate backers. The momentum is strong as the political pendulum swings against the earth.

The movement focuses on market value of private property, arguing that environmental laws are unfairly devaluing private property. A too narrow, yet effective, campaign in today's political atmosphere.

Once a fringe group, the "wise use" folks are now one of the new darlings of Congress. While some want private property owners to be compensated, others seek to remove any environmental law or regulation over private property.

Fortunately, the 5th Amendment to the US Constitution provides for some compensation. However, if the private property movement, fueled by corporate interests, have found safe haven, who is defending common property—that which provides the basis of life for all of us?

Where in the Constitution is air and water and ecosystems protected? We have an obligation to act, and our great grandchildren have a right to inherit our wealth, which certainly means more than a balanced budget.

In this rush to shore up private property rights, we are throwing out the baby with the bathwater. The short term solution for some creates an even greater and long term problem for us all. A fairer solution is to protect all property.

The taking of common property through abuse of private property use should be as illegal as the opposite.
Currently, common property-that, which by its nature, cannot be owned by an individual-is without protection. Yet, preservation of common property, such as air and water, are essential to all other rights.

Indeed, past environmental laws have had ambiguous constitutional authority; they were more common sense or common law. Some argue they are all reactionary, albeit necessary for the common good.

As effluents went beyond the fence line or smokestack or factory door, neighbors complained and rules and laws were promulgated. Necessary, but reactionary nonetheless. Today, when pitted against the clearer 5th Amendment protections, these laws and their protections are now endangered. Yet, the effluents continue and without regulation will increase, with very real impacts on health and habitat.

The challenge is to protect both, rather than getting rid of one at the expense of the other. In light of the obvious partisan politics afoot, what's needed is Constitutional balance, not more reactionary debate.

By adding to the definition of property we also broaden the concept of "takings," the term used in the private property debate. Common sense tells us that common property exists, and is being undermined, and needs protection, just as private property has protection.

7th Generation Amendment — Draft Language
The rights of the people to use and enjoy air, water, sunlight, and other renewable resources determined by Congress to be common property, shall not be impaired, nor shall such use impair their availability for the future generations.

The taking of common property through abuse of private property use should be as illegal as the opposite. Therefore we propose a Constitutional remedy which can provide these dual protections.

In revisiting the Constitution, we found no protection for common property. But we did find a that which, when married with new language, will provide protections. The basis, we think, is in the Preamble.

The Preamble states that these constitutional rights belong not just to us alive today but also to the future: "We the People of the United States . . . secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity." (Emphasis added.)

This Posterity clause clearly states that our descendants are guaranteed these "Blessings of Liberty." And we must infer that while we may use them today, we have no right to expend or damage them so that they are not available for the future. Rights were legally guaranteed for future generations. This was not a typographical error nor was it a superfluous filler. We intend to enliven this clause in our effort to assure the needed protections.

Thus, as we seek common property protections, we do so not just for today, as a momentary reaction to those in power, but we become constitutionally obligated to be caretakers for generations to come.

This different vision will enable us to see the consequences of our actions differently. By protecting rights for ourselves and for posterity we provide for the baby while changing the bath water.

Iroquois Chief Oren Lyons, in an interview with Bill Moyers, said that Benjamin Franklin turned to the Iroquois among others in trying to shape a better form of government. Apparently he listened and included elements of Iroquois governance including the concept of posterity.

Franklin's posterity, found in the Preamble, was the Iroquois concept of providing for the 7th generation. Chief Lyons said that as the Iroquois leaders contemplate policy they must always factor in how today's decision will affect the 7th generation into the future.

By simply attempting reform with what is available today, we remain in a stagnated "jobs vs. environment" polarization. In these complex times we must be more creative, yes proactive, and indeed accommodate all of our interests and rights, especially those yet to come.

To that end we, the 7th Generation Committee, have developed draft language which we think overcomes this dilemma. We call it the 7th Generation Amendment to the US Constitution. It was initially called the Common Property Amendment.

Our goal is to have a national debate beginning on Earth Day 1996, to have a bill before Congress on Earth Day 1997, and to get the necessary state ratifications by Earth Day 2000.

We chose Earth Day 2000 because half of those involved are youth who will turn 18 (voting age) on or after Earth Day 2000. The only criteria we ask of their participation is that they promise to vote.

If we adults refuse to look out for the future, the children of Generation M—the Millennial Generation—will rightfully set aside. In seven generations we will all be gone.

If we can rob from the poor to give to the rich ostensibly to balance the budget to prevent an unfair future economic burden, then surely we can commit the rest of our lives so that these same Great grandchildren will have the opportunity to breathe and drink safely.

And we must always remember, water is always more precious than gold.

7th Generation Timeline/Activities
Earth Day 1996-Environmental Fair for Youth, Benefit Concert for all, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; March/rally at State Capital, Madison, Wisconsin; national kick-off campaign.
The 7th Generation Committee will gladly send materials or visit your community regarding this campaign. And, of course, all donations are gladly accepted. For more information write the 7th Generation Committee, 1200 Ellis Avenue, Ashland, WI 54806; Committee members: Walt Bresette, 715/779-5071; Tom Busiahn, 715/682-3658; Jan Conley, 715/392-5782 or 218/726-1828; Robin Goree, 715/682-8848; Frank Koehn, 715/774-3333; Judy Pratt-Shelly, 715/779-3700.

Synthesis/Regeneration home page | S/R 9 Contents

State and national legislatures are gutting environmental laws in a misguided effort to in response to the populist "wise use" movement and their corporate backers. The momentum is strong as the political pendulum swings against the earth.

Address

Ashland, WI
54806

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Friends of Bay City Creek, Ashland, Wisconsin posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Friends of Bay City Creek, Ashland, Wisconsin:

Share