03/02/2022
One week until election day and the biggest item on the ballot is our proposed project to renovate Amherst Middle School and build what is an essentially brand new, consolidated Clark-Wilkins Elementary.
When I ran in 2019, I had already been serving on the Joint Facilities Advisory Committee for several months. Our mission was to look at our buildings and come up with a plan for them for the next 20 years.
In full disclosure - when I joined JFAC, I was committed to finding a way to ensure we did NOT build a new school. I was opposed to the tax increase I thought we would face if a new school was proposed. Now, three years later, I am supporting the school projects on this year's ballot. There are several reasons for this:
1. Our buildings are not in great shape. Clark, Wilkins, and AMS are all at least 50 years old. Many of the major elements - HVAC, roofing - are nearing end of life.
2. We have a severe lack of space. This is due to many reasons - reducing class sizes for better student outcomes, enhanced special education programs that require a lot of space, etc. But it leaves us using closets as offices, storing printers in hallways, and having interventionists using communal space for what should be one-on-one educational sessions with students.
3. AMS in particular doesn't meet all state requirements for space allocated for learning. Irregularly shaped classrooms reduce usable space by as much as 30% in some classrooms that are already below standards set by the state department of education.
4. We utilize portable classrooms for Wilkins, which are separated from the main building. These represent more travel time for students for lunch and classes like art or PE, and they aren't as secure as being inside the main building.
5. It is not efficient to operate two elementary schools, particularly for building leaders, shared staffing (maintenance workers), and lunch staff (Clark does not have a kitchen so lunch is driven back and forth to Wilkins each day).
6. If we were to keep our current buildings, the price tag is no less intimidating. We're looking at upwards of $60+ million over the next 20 years, and that is only for upkeep, not upgrades to retrofit our buildings for the current educational needs of our district. Factoring in the varied costs of repairs needed each year, the tax rate is wildly inconsistent when compared to a bonded project that peaks in year two and gradually decreases over the life of the bond.
The care of our buildings has been neglected for far too long in this town, and this project is partly a result of the decisions made (or not made) in the last 20 years. As of two years ago, we had just $22,000 in our long-term building maintenance fund. If that's what you had in a fund to maintain your house, you might not feel comfortable. To have that meager amount for a school is unacceptable.
I encourage you to view the details of the school project on the JFAC website, https://jfac.sau39.org/. This site is the culmination of four-plus years of work and research into this project and our buildings. And be sure to attend our final public forum Monday at 4 p.m. at Wilkins, AMS, or virtually to learn more about the project.