09/09/2026
DIALSTONE LANE FIELDS APPLICATION
Tonight at the Town Hall we considered Stockport Grammar's planning application for 106 new homes on the field opposite Dialstone Lane Methodist Church.
As local councillors we felt unable to recommend approval or rejection of the homes and I wanted to explain why. It's also important to note that we never had the power to make a final decision tonight, as that instead sits with Planning Committee that will consider the application in a few weeks. As another councillor suggested tonight too, in short the Government's massive changes to planning rules mean that even if the application is rejected locally, there is a good chance that the Government will approve it anyway on appeal. We have seen this with other planning applications across Stockport.
There are absolutely some positives within the application, including nearly a million pound of contributions to provide a sports pitch in our community, all proposed homes being eco-friendly with solar panels, half a million pound contribution to local education services and 50% of proposed homes being for shared ownership and social rent.
These are important and particularly in light of our housing crisis. Here in Offerton we have around 500 applications from families needing housing, and around 300 of those are families in overcrowded housing.
However there were significant objections to the proposed housing from local residents, and some key questions from residents and councillors could not be fully answered tonight. These included around impacts on local parking and traffic, why there is no contribution to local health services, and why no traffic assessment was done for the nearby junction of Dialstone Lane and Mile End Lane, given how bad it can get already.
As the independent advice of planning officers was to recommend approval of the proposed housing given it complies with guidance set by national Government, but as there are such strong objections and a lack of answers on key questions at this stage, we were not able to recommend approval or rejection tonight. We did however recommend that the Planning Committee should visit the site, and that the issues raised by residents tonight should be considered when making a decision.
This will now go to Planning Committee for that decision in a few weeks. As I say though, the reality is that changes to national planning rules by the Government have made it easier for developers to build homes, and the advice of planning officers is that the proposed homes complies with that national guidance.