07/09/2026
There’s something about this poster that made me stop for a second.
It’s not just the slightly unhinged WrestleMania energy 😂
Reform spend an enormous amount of time talking about protecting “our women and girls”.
Yet at their own conference this weekend, a woman protesting Nigel Farage was grabbed by members of the audience, had her hair and face pulled at, and was struck with a walking stick while security were already removing her.
You don’t have to agree with her protest.
You can think she was disruptive, annoying or completely wrong.
None of that gives a group of grown men licence to put their hands on her.
What troubled me almost as much was the response afterwards. Robert Jenrick said he had “zero sympathy” for her. West Midlands Police are now asking her to come forward so they can make enquiries.
So I think there’s a pretty basic question here.
How exactly does this fit with all the rhetoric about protecting women and children?
Protecting women cannot mean protecting only the women who agree with you.
And protecting children cannot mean teaching boys that political disagreement makes violence against a woman somehow understandable.
History gives us plenty of reasons to be wary of political movements that spend a lot of time identifying threatening “outsiders”, while becoming remarkably forgiving when intimidation comes from people on their own side.
I’m not interested in throwing the word fascism around lightly. But I do think the relationship between authoritarian politics, masculinity, fear and the language of “protecting women” is worth paying attention to.
If your politics says “protect our women” but your reaction when a woman you dislike is struck is essentially “she brought it on herself”, then perhaps it’s worth asking what exactly is being protected.
Different ring. Same old bullying.