The Bruges Group

The Bruges Group The Bruges Group spearheads the intellectual battle against the notion of ever–closer Union in Europe

We must not let Liebour take us back into the EU. Catherine McBride OBE sets out why:
14/09/2026

We must not let Liebour take us back into the EU. Catherine McBride OBE sets out why:

Labour's EU reset is the UK government's strategy to improve and re...

Boom, that’s the war chest almost filled. It will put Burnham off calling an early election, and gives time, much needed...
12/09/2026

Boom, that’s the war chest almost filled.
It will put Burnham off calling an early election, and gives time, much needed time, for reform to get its ducks in a row.

9/11. 25 years ago today.We will remember them.
11/09/2026

9/11. 25 years ago today.
We will remember them.

Camilla Tominey: Burnham’s EU reset plan will be an economic disasterScratch the surface and you’ll find an act of domes...
06/09/2026

Camilla Tominey: Burnham’s EU reset plan will be an economic disaster
Scratch the surface and you’ll find an act of domestic self-sabotage that broken Britain can ill afford

Camilla Tominey
05 September 2026 8:00am BST

Listen to the Bregretful cheerleaders of the UK’s rejoin movement and a “reset” of our relationship with the European Union appears to be simple common sense. Framed as a sort of diplomatic act of conscious recoupling, advocates claim it will cut airport queues along with cross-Channel red tape. As with Project Fear, it’s scaremongering nonsense. Scratch the surface of the “dynamic realignment” schtick and you’ll find an act of domestic self-sabotage that broken Britain can ill afford.

According to a scathing new report by the Great British Business Council (GBBC) titled Unconditional Surrender!, Andy-Blame-everything-on-Brexit-Burnham’s grand EU plan isn’t a pragmatic middle ground in the vein of the new PM’s quest for “problem solving over point scoring”. It is an act of economic and political madness that would force the UK to pay billions for the privilege of bending the knee to Brussels in return for crippling key British industries and handing our national sovereignty away on a silver platter.

The central myth is that reversing the referendum will save Britain much-needed cash. The reality, according to the GBBC, is an eye-watering fiscal mugging. The report estimates that any reboot of our relationship with the bloc will cost British taxpayers, businesses and universities an astounding £17.6bn in 2027, rising to £20.5bn per annum by the 2030s. On top of this annual haemorrhage, British companies will be forced to cough up an initial £12bn just in one-off compliance costs. To put that into perspective, it would mean the UK would end up paying more money to Brussels than it did as a full-fledged member state, except this time, we would be rule takers not rule makers.

Under the proposed terms, Britain would be forced to automatically adopt every loony law and dodgy directive handed down by the EU with zero right of veto – all under exclusive jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Even worse, the plan would commit the UK to a permanent contribution to the EU Cohesion Fund, a pot of money specifically earmarked to level up poorer regions in continental Europe. Would we receive a single penny back in return? I think you already know the answer to that question. I appreciate Burnham is a fan of devolution, but borrowing money we haven’t got, to subsidise infrastructure projects in Slovakia and Poland while our own regional economies fight for cash is plainly a completely bonkers idea.

The social costs are equally eye-watering. Under the proposed concessions on Labour’s beloved “yoof mobility” scheme, the UK would be forced to part-fund EU citizens up to the age of 30, granting them discounted university fees, free access to the NHS, and, of course, the right to bring family members to Blighty. The GBBC estimates that would strip universities of £2.7bn in vital international student fee income at a time when they are already strapped for cash.

Scratch the surface and you’ll find an act of domestic self-sabotage that broken Britain can ill afford

Britain left the EU ('Brexit') in January 2020How have the two economies fared since?As expected, Britain has grown fast...
05/09/2026

Britain left the EU ('Brexit') in January 2020

How have the two economies fared since?

As expected, Britain has grown faster than the moribund, enterprise-sapping, inward looking, anti-democratic, unaccountable, and oh so smug EU

Ignore the saddo Remoaners aching for more rule from the Brussels Bastards

Brexit has been GOOD for us!

And now the US negotiator says it publicly - and he doesn’t know the half of it, nor how profound the problems here are....
05/09/2026

And now the US negotiator says it publicly - and he doesn’t know the half of it, nor how profound the problems here are.

Jamieson Greer says Britain’s alignment with EU is a ‘problem’ for a US trade deal

The Great British 🇬🇧 Business Council paper on the EU Reset is out today.There is no upside for the UK: just enormous co...
02/09/2026

The Great British 🇬🇧 Business Council paper on the EU Reset is out today.

There is no upside for the UK: just enormous costs and regulations to obey.

Please share it if you can.

The executive summary has a list of talking points.

The EU Reset will cost Britain £17.6bn in 2027, rising to £20.5bn a year, plus £12bn in one-off compliance. Catherine McBride OBE sets out the full bill.

Iceland has rejected commencing accession talks to join the EU.In a referendum on Saturday, 52.5 per cent of Icelanders ...
30/08/2026

Iceland has rejected commencing accession talks to join the EU.

In a referendum on Saturday, 52.5 per cent of Icelanders voted No, with the Yes camp attracting 47.5 per cent of the vote

Allister Heath: If you want to grasp why a bitterly divided British Right is facing an existential crisis, look no furth...
29/08/2026

Allister Heath: If you want to grasp why a bitterly divided British Right is facing an existential crisis, look no further than this week’s council by-elections, a vignette into Britain’s politics of the absurd.

The results should serve as a brutal wake-up call for both Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage – they were good news for Andy Burnham, whose strategy of studied laziness throughout the summer appears to have paid off, if only by accident.

Dover, Merseyside and Wandsworth are entirely different areas, with completely dissimilar demographics, economies and problems, but the Left’s by-election triumphs in all three are an ominous development for those of a conservative disposition. Let’s analyse each by-election in turn.

The Guston, Kingsdown & St Margaret’s-at-Cliffe (Dover) ward fell to the Greens, even though the three Right-wing parties grabbed a combined 55pc of the vote. Yet the far-Left Greens won with 28.8pc, beating Reform (on 27.5pc) by some 30 votes. The Tories lost almost half their share, falling to 17.1pc, but that wasn’t enough to save Reform, especially given that Rupert Lowe’s Restore grabbed a record 10.7pc.

A divided Right in a county troubled by migration and with a demographic make-up that should make it a safe seat for small-c conservatism ended up voting for a far-Left party that looks kindly upon open borders ideology. It was a mad, stupid, perverse outcome which will see the local majority’s views utterly disregarded. It’s bad enough when Right-wing voters split two ways; when they split three ways (with all three on 10-30pc) it’s a catastrophe.

Ultimately, it is Lowe who is to blame: he prefers to see the Left elected than one of Farage’s representatives. It is deeply selfish.

Reform also lost badly in a ward in St Helens, a Merseyside council the party won last May, highlighting three other problems for Farage’s party: it finds incumbency difficult, many of its gains in Red Wall areas were helped by a divided Left, and Northern voters in particular are keen on Burnham, if only for vibes-based reasons.

One of Reform’s councillors stood down, and Labour swept to victory in Billinge & Seneley Green (St Helen’s). Labour surged 18.8 points to 41.4pc, while Reform lost 2.6 points to 31.9pc. In this case, Reform did succeed in uniting the Right (the Tories are now down to just 3pc in this ward) but Burnham did a much better job at uniting the Left, grabbing the bulk of a much larger Green vote.

The Tories were the great losers in Wandsworth, a prosperous South London borough, a blow made all the harder to bear by the fact that every condition should have been met for them to win the Trinity ward. The Tories put a huge amount of effort into campaigning locally, with Badenoch and shadow cabinet ministers taking part. They were also gifted what ought to have been a trump card: Wandsworth is about to be forced to push through Britain’s greatest ever hike to council tax as a result of a decision by Labour to slash central funding.

Despicably, Wandsworth will probably need to raise council tax by 160pc, a mind-boggling rise which should have been enough to trigger a massive tax revolt and a national row. On top of this, the Tories could argue that a win in that ward would have given them a full majority on the council (rather than the present minority administration) and thus greater moral power to fight Labour’s class warfare.

It didn’t work. Boosted by the Burnham factor and by the fact that some local voters actually seemed to believe the tax rises were the Tories’ fault, Labour increased its share of the vote by 8.8pc to 47.5pc in Trinity, and the Conservatives rose by only nine points to 43.6pc, handing Burnham an easy win.

Reform is dead in Wandsworth, gaining just 2pc of the vote, so in this case the Right was united. The problem for the conservative movement is that swathes of London are dominated by socialists and progressives, including many who vote against their own financial self-interest. Like in a classic rotten borough, they will tolerate and vote for chaos and decline, and will back the Left unconditionally, regardless of its failures, nastiness or stupidity.

It wasn’t all bad for the Right in this latest batch of council by-elections, but even victories were caveated with warning signs: Reform easily won a seat in Sheffield, despite a strong Labour surge. Although it retained a seat in Newcastle, its vote share declined with a Lib Dem surge.

The conclusion is clear. Burnham is much more popular than Starmer, and has, for now, partly rewritten the electoral arithmetic in Labour’s favour. Reform is falling back in some areas and nationally, on average. The Tories are struggling even in areas they should be winning. Restore is continuing to grow in a few target areas, though it stands no real chance.

While not all of the Right’s woes can be attributed to division, a three-way split of the conservative electorate in the present moment would guarantee a Left-wing victory at an early general election. A lot more unity is a necessary but not sufficient condition for a Right-wing victory.

Farage is kicking off the party conference season in Birmingham next week. He cannot afford a stumble.

Are you happy about this?
27/08/2026

Are you happy about this?

Finally, the mind-boggling UK debt and spending numbers - made real

Address

City Of Westminster

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Bruges Group posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organisation

Send a message to The Bruges Group:

Shortcuts

Share