08/09/2026
How We Forced Angela Rayner & Labour to Halt Its Nottinghamshire Carve-Up
Because there was a wider strategy at play.
Labour forced local government reorganisation upon Nottinghamshire. It was never in their 2024 election manifesto. Ignoring it, pretending it would go away and doing nothing was NOT an option. We had to put forward a proposal, and the realistic choice was whether Gedling or Rushcliffe joined Nottingham City and Broxtowe.
Neither option was ideal and I recognised no one wanted it. However, the analysis carried out by financial experts PwC showed that the Gedling option, known as 1B, was the stronger option financially and geographically, as well as with closer integrated transport and social care links. It also followed the Government’s guidance framework that they published about how they would implement LGR by using existing boroughs and districts intact and as building blocks creating the new Councils with around 500k residents each.
But we also war-gamed what the Labour Government and Labour ran Nottingham City Council would do next.
We predicted that Labour-run Nottingham City Council would produce its own plan, carving up Gedling, Broxtowe and Rushcliffe. We also predicted that the Labour Government would choose it, despite it departing from the framework they had originally set. And that's exactly what they did.
By us putting forward the strongest viable option within their framework, we ensured that if Labour moved the goalposts (which they did) , we would be in the strongest possible position to launch a legal challenge against the entire process.
If our prediction had been wrong and 1B had been selected, it was still the least-worst and most evidence-based option available. But our wider political strategy was always to stop local government reorganisation altogether, or at least delay it long enough for a future government to reconsider it.
Labour did exactly what we predicted. Not only in Nottinghamshire, but the same happened in other councils up and down the country. Reform councils responded with legal challenges and preparations for judicial reviews.
Now, just two months later, the secretary of state Angela Rayner has been forced to pause the entire process. Labour has essentially capitulated because it clearly has no confidence that its decisions could survive proper legal challenge.
I always opposed Gedling being absorbed into the city then, and I oppose it now. My vote was never an endorsement of Labour’s reorganisation. It was part of a wider, carefully considered strategy to stop it.
Let me be clear, if we had not put forward an option, we would have had no basis to challenge the decision legally. The government chosen City option would have proceeded unimpeded and they would have proceeded with the carve up of our county.