17/07/2025
https://fb.watch/AV3Fdt3UEh/
Councillor Philip Jackson stated in this interview on the NEL Conservative page that Labour and the Independent group voted against the redevelopment of Grimsby town center in last December's full cabinet meeting. Well first to correct councillor Jackson, it was a full council meeting, and his statement is a complete misrepresentation of the facts. What was voted on in that full council meeting included the following;
a. increase the Council’s capital programme budget from £30.9m to £49.96m.
b. increase the external borrowing requirement of the Council by £11.26m.
c. undertake further borrowing as may reasonably be required, subject to such borrowing being affordable from within the Freshney Place budget envelope.
d. subject to any external grant conditions, to deal with the reallocation of Towns Fund monies of £3.7m to the Freshney Place Leisure Scheme.
I did not believe that there had been sufficient time to scrutinise the impact of this, and had reservations on the S151 officer being able to borrow even more money without further full council approval. I was also not happy with the decision to move funds from Central Library to the Freshney Place Leisure scheme without any assessment of what this meant for the Library building.
Councillor Jackson also claimed that it was Conservative government money that is paying for this scheme. Government money is public money and the government of the day decides where its spent.
A cynical person may be inclined to think the government of the day uses public money in areas where it wants to gain votes and hold onto seats.
You can make your own minds up as to what is factual.
Below is the statement I made at the full council meeting.
"I’m sure I will be accused of not being aspirational and not being part of the positive for this. We all want a vibrant town center, we all want this to succeed, but, I have reservations about the scale of borrowing, and the risk we are taking.
At last week’s scrutiny meeting on this report, I heard members say, we need to be cracking on with it, we need to create certainty, business leaders are behind it, Parkway Cinemas are behind it, we’ve got Starbuck’s and Nando’s signed up, and many others are just waiting for this decision. If we dither now, the whole thing may fall apart. It feels like we are being rail-roaded into agreeing to this, because we’ve come too far to turn back now.
Less than a month ago we were expecting a report, supported by a business case, to come before full council, asking for approval for a leisure scheme with borrowing of £10.9M.
Now we are being asked to approve borrowing of £22.16M and also to approve the S151 Officer be authorised to undertake further borrowing as may reasonably be required, with the caveat that such borrowing be affordable from within the Freshney Place budget envelope. This is akin to signing a blank check. Any additional borrowing should be scrutinised and have approval of full council.
It was also mooted in scrutiny that we may look to sell Freshney place in the Future, but that option does not appear in this report.
A couple of hours before last weeks scrutiny meeting on this, we received the business case which had not been updated with the current financial commitment we are being asked to approve.
As well as the significant increase in borrowing, we are pulling in funding from other sources. To keep the borrowing down. We are taking £7.8M from funds that had been granted for other uses, to support the Freshney Place scheme.
The remaining £3.7M from the £4.2M Towns fund earmarked for the library, has been transferred to the Freshney Place Leisure scheme, with no details being given on the potential impact this will have on the library building.
In June 2023 we had a briefing note that this money was to be spent on essential repairs to the building and refurbishment of the first and second floors. Now we have some vague references to future funding for this work and outcomes that are being delivered differently.
Anyone who has watched the news over the last few days will be aware the chancellor is asking for every government department to find savings of 5% of their budget for next year, so there are likely to be some lean years ahead for government funding.
By the time this proposed scheme is complete, many of those in this room will not be here, but the impact of today’s decision will be generational, and we all hope positive. So, let’s take a pause, look at the other options as outlined in the amendment, and ensure that we make the right decision."