15/09/2026
WHAT ELSE DID THEY JUST VOTE THROUGH?
Tonight Birmingham City Council debated an agenda item dominated by changes to national planning rules.
Reform made clear that we disagree with those changes. We do not support reducing the voice of residents and elected councillors in the planning process. We do not support increasing the powers of unelected officers at the expense of democratic accountability.
But these national planning changes are being imposed on the Council and Birmingham is legally required to implement them.
Yet bundled into the same report were separate changes to Birmingham City Council’s own Constitution - changes the Council did have a choice about.
They included removing the express provision for supplementary questions to committee chairs, making a motion on notice the route for removing a committee chair, and significant changes to financial and officer delegations covering areas including reserves, loans, investments and business cases.
So we had a lengthy debate about nationally imposed planning rules, which Reform opposes but which the Council is legally required to implement, while significant changes to councillors’ ability to question and challenge those in positions of power - and to the powers exercised by unelected officers - were quietly carried along with them.
And they voted the whole package through.
That’s exactly why Reform refused to rubber-stamp the package.
We oppose reducing residents’ voices in planning. We also oppose weakening councillors’ ability to hold people to account.
If you’re changing Birmingham City Council’s own rules, don’t hide those changes amongst measures the Council is legally required to implement.