06/20/2026
Why the F-35?
Emotion seems to be driving much of the popular opinion against the F35 in Canada. It's American, Trump is American, Trump is bad, therefore American is bad, therefore the F35 is bad. To this I say Trump has treated Canada badly but Trump will be gone in two years and the US will remain. Trump is a short term problem, and working with the US is our long term destiny. We have no choice because look at a map.
To date the US military continues to work seamlessly with the Canadian military, ignoring to the extent possible the noise from Ottawa and the White House. This is a good thing because it preserves the interoperability of the two forces and our mutual ability to resist outside aggression.
Most civilian Americans don't spend their days thinking about Canadians like we seem sometimes to think about Americans, but so far they seem to have a general sense of friendship toward us, and some of them are actively embarrassed at Trump's behaviour toward us. We share democratic ideals, cultural norms, legal precepts and we have died together on foreign fields defending those things. We have been friends for over two centuries.
But both Democrats and Republicans in the US are nervous about our ties to China, whether it's our security arrangements or our trade arrangements. And not just rabid MAGA Republicans either...Michigan Democrats are pushing to ban Canadian Chinese imports. If Carney stops trying to poison the well with the US and trying to turn Canada into a province of Europe, relations have a chance to normalize after Trump leaves. Otherwise, the short term problem is going to become a long term problem.
But I digress.
The F35 and the Gripen are two types of planes.
The Gripen is STOL, adapted to rough tactical conditions, and made for fighting over electronically protected skies in a defensive stance. They are cheap, easy to repair, and have some adaptive advantages. It depends upon an American engine to live up to its claims.
The CEO of SAAB recently explained to me that SAAB has developed the ability - if I understood him correctly - to separate the flying components from the accessory components, allowing major changes to be made to weaponry, radar, etc. without having to wait for recertification, because none of the flying components had to be changed. Apparently in other aircraft, everything is mixed together so that any changes have to be recertified and that takes ~ 18 months.
The F35 is expensive, difficult to repair, and requires a massive logistical tail. And it's American, although many of its parts are made in Canada. The F35 is also stealth, making it the only possible choice for Arctic forward defence.
A top RCAF general explained it to me at a conference recently in Ottawa. Because all armaments and fuel tanks are internal in the F35, it looks like a golf ball to the enemy. The pilot has the ability to see his/her own radar profile - what the enemy sees - from inside the cockpit so they can adjust trim etc. to optimize stealth.
The F35 also seamlessly integrates various detection devices to produce a 360degree visual without having to use different instruments to get the full icture. And of course it's already communication-ready with Norad because it was built with Norad in mind.
At a recent "war game" in Ottawa, in which a situation is gamed out by top military planners, when an F35 attacked a Russian invasion fleet, the Russians were not even given a roll of the dice, because by the time the F35 payloads hit, the F35s were already back out of range, never having been detected. It's important to note that they were in unprotected skies without electronic cover, and still inseen.
Conversely, he said the Gripen was fine for tactical fighting in protected skies, but the minute you strap on a missile or external fuel tank, it lights up radar all around. Gripens cannot be used for forward defence. They cannot be used in the Arctic. They can be used to fight over our cities, but by then we're already losing.
The Gripens are cool and nifty, but the F35 is the only fighter that can actually do the job the CAF needs it to do.
Photo credit: EurAsianTimes.com