Larry Waldinger, Green Party Member

07/02/2024

“I am a fan of clever, practical packaging, and they brilliantly bagged this one.”

01/15/2013

“Media, owned by big business, servicing big business, biased for big business.”

01/03/2013

This was recommended by a friend:

http://www.commondreams.org/video/2013/01/02

I viewed the video. It is good. The two interviewees are excellent.

Canada's Idle No More movement began as a small social media campaign - armed with little more than a hashtag and a cause. But it has grown into a large indigenous movement, with protests and ceremonial gatherings held almost daily in many of the country's major cities. The movement is spearheaded b...

09/27/2012

http://www.leadnow.ca/end-big-polluter-handouts

In 2009, Prime Minister Harper promised to end Canada’s massive $1.4 billion-a-year public handout to big fossil fuel companies. Click here to tell the government to keep its promise and stop giving out a huge bonus to rich oil companies that don’t need it.

06/06/2012

I am very impressed by EMay's "Point of Order" in this video

Elizabeth May, MP

05/29/2012

“Western Canadian premieres meeting to discuss the sustainable development of resources is like foxes meeting to discuss the sustainable development of chickens.” Larry Waldinger May 29, 2012

05/23/2012

Canada's reputation is being dragged through the mud (oil sands).

05/20/2012

Isaac Asimov's 3 Rules For Robots Applied to Capitalism:

1. Capitalism may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. Capitalism must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. Capitalism must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

All I have done here is change the first 2 words of the 3 rules from "A robot" to "Capitalism". I think rule 3 goes beyond ideal in this new version.

10/28/2011

Friday, October 28
Saskatoon Cycles

Hello,

My name is Robert Judge. I am on the board of Saskatoon Cycles. We
promote cycling as year-round transportation for all ages. With over
1200 members we are now the largest bicycle group in Saskatchewan. Our
rapid growth reflects how urgent cycling issues are with voters and
taxpayers. We are asking 4 questions about cycling and provincial
politics of each candidate in Saskatoon's 12 ridings, and the party
leaders. We will not endorse any party or candidate. We will post all
responses on our website, saskatooncycles.ca and share with the media.
If you are able to answer even one question or make comment, we would
appreciate that.

Note: We are re-sending this email originally from 22nd October
because there may have been some glitches receiving it.

Thank-you for participating. All the best in your campaign.

1) On average motor vehicles injure 11 and kill 2 cyclists each year
in Saskatchewan. Fear of cars is the largest factor preventing more
people from cycling. Would you have SGI put more emphasis on teaching
motorists to safely share the road with cyclists?

Larry Waldinger: Yes that would help make the roads safer for cyclists who dare to ride on the roads. For those cyclist whose dare not ride on the roads they should be allowed to ride on sidewalks. Common sense should allow pedestrians, strollers, wheel chairs, and cyclists to all safely share the sidewalks. More street corner curb cuts would help all wheeled traffic on sidewalks too.

2) Highway construction workers are protected by buffer zones and a
speed limit with stiff penalties. Tow truck and emergency workers are
protected by a speed limit. Cyclists have no protection. There is no
minimum distance a car must keep when passing a cyclist, and our
members experience cars passing too closely in the same lane. This
safety hazard sometimes includes a spray of mud. What rules would you
put in place to protect cyclists?

Larry Waldinger: Reduced speed limits around cyclists (like school zones) is something that immediately comes to mind. There are probably many other better rules. I notice that when I walk or ride across the 25th Street Bridge in the rain splash from motorists arcs over the protective barrier and splashes me.

3) Given the benefits to the taxpayer of increased cycling, where do
you stand on removing the PST from bicycles and accessories?

Larry Waldinger: That is an awesome idea. I would like to meet whoever came up with that idea.

4) Healthcare budgets are ballooning, pushed up by diseases of
inactivity. Studies show that money invested in bikeways is recouped
several times over in lowered healthcare costs. However, municipal
politicians say healthcare costs are a provincial responsibility, and
provincial politicians say bikeways are a municipal responsibility.
Should the province save money on healthcare by helping our cities
invest in safer bikeways? If so, by how much?

Larry Waldinger: Yes. The Green Party of Saskatchewan strongly supports preventive health care. The province should invest A LOT in safer bike-ways because it makes economic sense. One of the obstacles to preventive medicine is that corrective medicine like expensive surgery and pharmaceuticals are better for the GDP, and our society has an unhealthy obsession with GDP.

Also important to consider is the influence the petroleum industry exerts in Saskatchewan. They would not be pleased to see a wide scale shift from the use of motorized vehicles burning their fuels to the use of bicycles. The Green Party is the only party that refuses to accept campaign contributions from any corporations or lobbyists, so you could expect elected Green Party MLA's to act in the interests of the people of Saskatchewan.

10/22/2011

Senators intend to present motions regarding Autonomy, Corporatization, Transparency and Communication at U of S Senate Meeting

The following are summarized motions that were submitted to the U of S Secretary, by elected senators, for inclusion in the October 15m U of S Senate Meeting Agenda. The motions were twice rejected by the Senate Executive on the basis that they were not “in order” and that they would like to “ensur[e] that sufficient time is given to the Substantive issues that are on the fall meeting agenda.” As they are currently drafted, the U of S Senate Bylaws do not restrict individual Senators from placing motions on the agenda and the Senate Executive has conceded that these motions can be presented at the Senate Meeting for inclusion in the agenda.

That these motions were rejected by the Senate Executive, is just another example of the impoverished democratic climate on the U of S Senate, and emphasize the urgency of having motions such as these on the agenda. These are substantive issues that deserve proper consideration and discussion at the upcoming U of S Senate meeting and these Senators intend to see them discussed. If you’re concerned about Autonomy, Corporatization, Transparency and Communication at the University of Saskatchewan, we encourage you and all Saskatchewan community members to attend the October 15m U of S Senate Meeting to show support for these motions.

Summaries of the three motions:

1. In light of an astonishing number of harassment and intimidation cases at the University of Saskatchewan, the senators seek clarification from the Board of Governors around the apparent dysfunctional role of the University administration in matters of dispute mediation and resolution.

2. In the past year alone, it was brought to the attention of the Board of Governors that their chair, Nancy Hopkins, appears to be in a significant conflict of interest by concurrently serving as a Cameco board member; and corporate and government interference has resulted in the inappropriate earmarking of $30 million of public money for the U of S Canadian Centre for Nuclear Innovation. Concerned that these instances represent a growing trend, the senators request clarification of issues regarding the apparent inability of the Board of Governors to protect the university autonomy from corporate and government influences.

3. At present, communication amongst U of S senators is restrictive and vetted by the University Secretary. USSWORD senators seek the formation of a committee to facilitate communication amongst all senators.

What: University of Saskatchewan Senate Meeting
When: 9:30AM, October 15, 2011
Where: Room 150, College of Law , University of Saskatchewan

10/19/2011

MEDIA RELEASE: Green Party's Larry Waldinger sees campaign surge in Saskatoon

www.saskgreen.ca

Tuesday, October 18, 2011.

WALDINGER HAS THE LEADING GREEN CAMPAIGN IN THE PROVINCE

SASKATOON – Green Party Leadership runner-up Larry Waldinger has bolted out of the blocks and taken a strong lead with his campaign in the constituency of Saskatoon Sutherland. Since the beginning of the year Waldinger has brought in over 25% of all revenue for the party and he has generated approximately twice the amount of donations of the next closest candidate.

Penny Swartz, Treasurer for the Green Party of Saskatchewan attests to the numbers. "Larry Waldinger is an example of a persistent, hardworking candidate that has been able to generate a quarter of the party's income to date to support the financial needs of his campaign."

The Green Party of Saskatchewan has seen a 50% increase in fundraising for the party compared to the entire 2007 election cycle.

Regarding his second place finish in the leadership race held on September 25, 2011 in Regina Larry says, "I am relieved that I can focus exclusively on my campaign. In fact I would have been a little startled to have won the leadership race, since I only joined the party in December. I think some members of the party are still skeptical, but that only makes me work harder."

Larry admits he has spent only a short time in politics. "My limited time in politics has not tied my hands. As a result I have come up with some innovations that have really boosted my campaign."

Larry Waldinger. The Green Party of Saskatchewan candidate for Saskatoon-Sutherland.

-31-

Contact:

Larry Waldinger
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 306-384-3398 (Home)
Phone: 306-717-7275 (Mobile)

If this is your first visit to the Green Party of Saskatchewan website, welcome! You can read our latest news releases including public appearances by candidates, in our News section.

10/17/2011

The NDP claims to represent the 99% but receives donations from the 1%. The Green Party truly represents the 99% and can only accept donations from the 99%.