09/09/2026
We need to stop treating compliance as evidence that everything must be fine. A child can walk through the door while frightened. A mother can facilitate contact while deeply concerned. A survivor can follow every direction given to her while believing that those directions are unsafe. Compliance tells you what somebody did. It does not automatically tell you how safe they felt doing it.
This matters particularly in family court, where survivors can face an impossible contradiction: raise concerns repeatedly and risk being characterised as obstructive, hostile or unwilling to promote a relationship, comply despite those concerns and risk that very compliance later being treated as evidence that the concerns cannot have been serious. Safeguarding requires more than asking whether contact happened. It requires professionals to remain curious about how the child is presenting, what they are communicating, what the evidence shows and whether the arrangements are actually safe.