Friends of Balmain Library

Friends of Balmain Library The Friends of Balmain Library (FOBL) is a non profit organisation founded in 1998.

FOBL aims to support, extend and promote the service of Balmain Library, advocating the cause of the library at all levels of government. FOBL presents a wide array of exciting events, from author talks, a monthly open book group, writing competitions and a lot more. FOBL’s fundraising sponsors a variety projects which enhance Balmain Library’s shelves and enliven its environment. FOBL provides th

e community with opportunities to invest in the success of the library by donating funds or becoming a member.

24/03/2026
24/03/2026

A truck loaded with thousands of copies of Thesaurus crashed yesterday losing its entire load. Witnesses were stunned, startled, aghast, taken aback, stupefied, confused, shocked, rattled, paralyzed, dazed, bewildered, mixed up, surprised, awed, dumbfounded, nonplussed, flabbergasted, astounded, amazed, confounded, astonished, overwhelmed, horrified, numbed, speechless, and perplexed.

{PS}

08/03/2026

They told her a woman's mind was too fragile for philosophy—so she became the friend of Nietzsche, the lover of Rilke, and the first female psychoanalyst.
They said a woman belongs in the shadow of a man, not in conversation with the greatest minds of Europe. They said her thoughts were too delicate for the weight of ideas, too emotional for the rigors of science.
Lou Andreas-Salomé spent her entire life proving them spectacularly wrong.
Born in Saint Petersburg in 1861, Lou was a wild, brilliant child who devoured books like oxygen. While other girls learned needlework, she learned philosophy. While society prepared her for marriage, she prepared herself for everything else.
At seventeen, she convinced a Dutch minister twenty-five years her senior to teach her theology, comparative religion, and literature. When he fell in love with her and proposed marriage, she refused. She had not studied to become someone's wife. She had studied to become herself.
At twenty-one, seeking warmer climates for her failing health, Lou and her mother traveled to Rome. There, in a literary salon, she met philosopher Paul Rée. He proposed marriage. She countered with something revolutionary: "Let's live together as intellectual equals—brother and sister—and find a third person to complete our commune of minds."
That third person was Friedrich Nietzsche.
When Nietzsche met Lou in April 1882, he was captivated. Not by her beauty alone—though she was striking—but by her mind. "By what stars have we been brought here together?" he asked.
He proposed marriage. She refused.
He proposed again, this time through Rée. She refused again.
But she agreed to their intellectual commune—three philosophers seeking truth together, walking Roman streets in endless conversation, debating existence itself.
The world watched, scandalized. A young woman, two men, no chaperone, no marriage—just ideas. Nietzsche's sister declared Lou "an immoral woman" and worked to separate them. The gossip was vicious. Lou didn't care.
She had discovered something more valuable than society's approval: intellectual freedom.
The commune never materialized. The relationships fractured under the weight of unrequited love and family interference. But Lou's impact on Nietzsche was undeniable. She inspired his masterwork, "Thus Spoke Zarathustra." He set her poetry to music. She wrote a penetrating analysis of his philosophy that he both admired and feared.
In 1887, Lou did something unexpected: she married Friedrich Carl Andreas, a Persian studies scholar. But on her terms. Their marriage would be celibate, intellectual, companionate. They would live as partners in ideas, not possession.
Andreas agreed, though he reportedly threatened su***de to secure even this unconventional arrangement. They remained married for forty-three years—until his death in 1930—while Lou continued her affairs, her friendships, her boundless intellectual pursuits.
She lived as she chose. She loved as she chose.
In her late thirties, Lou began a transformative relationship with a young poet named René Maria Rilke. She was his muse, his mentor, his lover. She changed his name to the more masculine "Rainer." She taught him Russian, introduced him to Tolstoy, shaped his poetic voice. Their affair lasted three years; their correspondence lasted a lifetime.
Then, at fifty years old, Lou discovered psychoanalysis.
In 1911, she attended a congress in Weimar and met Sigmund Freud. The founder of psychoanalysis recognized in her a kindred spirit—someone who understood the human psyche with unusual depth. He called her "the great understander."
She became his student, his colleague, his confidante. Freud allowed her to attend his lectures—the only woman granted this privilege. They corresponded for over two decades, debating narcissism, anxiety, human nature, and the unconscious mind.
Lou established her own psychoanalysis practice in Göttingen and became one of the first women to write about female sexuality from a psychoanalytic perspective. Her work explored eroticism, creativity, narcissism, and the psychology of religion—topics considered scandalous for a woman to discuss.
But Lou had never cared what was considered appropriate.
She wrote prolifically: novels, essays, poetry, psychoanalytic studies. She analyzed Nietzsche's philosophy. She memorialized Rilke. She corresponded with the intellectual giants of her age as an equal.
When the Gestapo confiscated her library shortly after her death in 1937—punishing her for practicing "Jewish science" and associating with Freud—they inadvertently testified to her significance. She had been dangerous enough to silence.
Lou Andreas-Salomé lived seventy-six years refusing to be defined by anyone's expectations. She chose intellectual partnership over conventional marriage. She chose truth over propriety. She chose freedom over safety.
Nietzsche called her "the smartest person I ever knew." Rilke said "all that I am stirs me, because of you." Freud honored her as a colleague who understood people better than they understood themselves.
But perhaps her greatest achievement was simply this: she lived exactly as she wanted.
In an age that told women to be small, Lou Andreas-Salomé became immense. In a world that demanded women choose between love and intellect, she chose both—on her own terms.
She was a philosopher without a university position. A psychoanalyst who revolutionized the field. A woman who loved freely while married. A thinker who influenced three of the most important minds in modern history.
She was, in every sense, unapologetically herself.
And in being herself—fully, brilliantly, defiantly—she proved that a woman's mind is not too fragile for philosophy. It is powerful enough to change it.

{PS}

08/03/2026

Spring, 1933. Germany.

A boarding school near Ulm starts teaching English with unusual intensity. British breakfast routines appear at morning meals. Teachers casually mention London geography, the feel of Dover fog, how to queue properly.

The students think their headmistress has simply become enthusiastic about foreign culture.

They're wrong.

Anna Essinger is preparing them to disappear.

She's 53 years old, Jewish, and she runs Landschulheim Herrlingen on principles the new government considers dangerous: independent thought, individual dignity, moral questioning. When Berlin orders every school to raise the sw****ka, Anna refuses. Not publicly. Not dramatically. She just organizes a "hiking trip" and empties the building before the ceremony.

But she knows this buys days, not safety.

Across Germany, Jewish students are being expelled, humiliated, beaten while teachers turn away. Then Anna learns something worse: a colleague's spouse reported her to officials. She's being monitored.

She doesn't wait to find out what comes next.

Quietly, desperately, she searches for sanctuary. She finds Bunce Court, a crumbling Tudor manor in Kent with leaking roofs, no electricity, no plumbing. It's barely habitable. It's also outside N**i jurisdiction.

Now comes the hardest part: convincing parents to let her take their children to England.

Imagine that conversation. A headmistress asking you to send your child to a foreign country, to a decaying mansion, with no guarantee you'll ever see them again. Almost every parent says yes. What choice exists?

October 5, 1933. The evacuation begins.

Sixty-six children and their teachers split into small groups, traveling different routes to avoid suspicion. Parents hand over their children with forced smiles, casual goodbyes, no tears that might alert authorities.

They reunite at the English coast. Red buses carry them into Kent. School resumes the next morning in a building with almost nothing: no beds, no working heat, no equipped kitchen. Students and teachers wire electricity together, convert stables into dormitories, plant gardens because there's barely money for food.

British inspectors arrive expecting chaos. They leave astonished.

27/11/2025

20 Words That Came From Weird Historical Events 🧐

15/11/2025

"Someday, all this To-Be-Read pile will be yours"

09/11/2025

Rebecca Solnit has made a career out of pointing at the invisible and making the world look.
She writes about the stories we inherit, the silences we mistake for peace, and the rules that
pass as “normal.” Her voice doesn’t shout; it unfolds slow, precise, and quietly devastating.
“Men invented standards they could meet and called them universal,” she wrote — a single line
that exposed centuries of authority disguised as objectivity. Whether in art, history, or politics,
the world had been built around male experience, then labeled fair. Solnit’s work asks what
happens when we stop accepting that as truth.
Her essays in Men Explain Things to Me, The Mother of All Questions, and Recollections of My
Nonexistence redefined feminist thought for a new generation. She doesn’t divide intellect from
emotion — she weaves them together, turning critique into art and theory into empathy.
Her power lies in her restraint. She doesn’t rage against the system; she reveals it with such
clarity that it collapses under its own absurdity. Through her writing, the personal becomes
political, and the ordinary becomes evidence of inequality hiding in plain sight.
Rebecca Solnit reminds us that naming injustice is the beginning of undoing it that every
“universal” rule was once just someone’s opinion made law.
Her gift is language, but her mission is liberation.

09/11/2025

Tracing the author’s life from bohemian Melbourne in the 70s to the breakdown of her marriage in the 90s, How to End a Story was praised by judges for ‘taking the diary form to new heights’

08/11/2025

History of English Literature

07/11/2025

Address

PO Box 978, Rozelle
Sydney, NSW
2039

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Friends of Balmain Library posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share