24/05/2024
CAPE TOWN’S PROPOSED NEW STRATEGY ON “REDUCING ROUGH SLEEPING IN CAPE TOWN” PART THREE
MY RESPONSE TO THE RECENTLY RELEASED DRAFT PLAN TO REDUCE ROUGH SLEEPING ON THE STREETS OF CAPE TOWN (PART 3)
This is my third column focusing on the City of Cape Town’s draft strategy on reducing rough sleeping and here please take note of the so-called achievements of the Safe Spaces since their inception. I was at a loss for words.
The City gives us a run down of their safe space intervention.
These Safe Spaces are temporary, transitional places of safety, where rough sleepers can sleep and store valuables. Guidance and care are provided to rough sleepers with the aim of assisting them towards re-integration
Again the City speaks with a forked tongue as they know that there is virtually no chance of re-integrating someone from a safe space, by their own admission, the majority of spending is allocated to safe space tenders (38%) and safe space security (25%) and only 5% on exposure and programs.
Culemborg Safe Space 1 (CBD): The Culemborg Safe Space was launched in June 2018:
Reintegrations 397 Family Reunification 68 Relocation Unknown over a 6 year period: 66 per year
The Culemborg Parking Lot was launched in 2020
Reintegration’s 67 Family Reunification 71 Relocation 33 over a 4 year period: 43 per year
Safe Space at Paint City (Bellville, Cape Town) launched in 2020
Reintegration’s 116 Family Reunification 37 Relocation Unknown over a 4 year period: 38 per year
These revelations leave me cold.
No other possible conclusion can be reached other than to say that the safe space intervention, as it stands, is a horrific waste of ratepayers money with no redeeming features.
It translates to 147 individuals being assisted per annum on close to R100 million investment.
I know that the calculation I am revealing to you now is over-simplified but it serves to provide a tangible idea the total waste of resources on a program that depicts a cost of R680 272.10 to successfully re-integrate one individual.
The City having admitted all this now stipulates that it is currently in the process of establishing additional Safe Spaces in the 2023/2024 financial year. The establishment of the Safe Spaces will contribute an additional 400 bed spaces which will reduce the number of people sleeping in open spaces and provide access to developmental services.
Surely, if the City understands what it has written and admitted to in the introduction to and summary of it’s draft strategy, and yet here they are proposing opening another safe space operating as the other three do and with the same unqualified and possibly worst performing service provider ever to be granted a tender in the sector managing it. The service provider tender for the proposed new Safe Space in Greenpoint was awarded over 6 months ago , despite the Safe Space still having no fixed opening date. This leaves little doubt in my mind that this strategy is a mere deflection.
This same service provider has been the subject of numerous complaints from both residents and other service providers. They have been the subject of forensic investigations, police criminal investigations, health inspector investigations and SAHRC investigations.
Their tender awards from the City have shocked long standing and respected organisations.
The words tender corruption are synonymous with MAT DOC and this is enough for me to seriously question the City’s sudden desire to address their strategy on rough sleeping
Somehow, at this point of dissecting this proposed strategy, the whispers of electioneering have become loud screams. Surely the City cannot be serious about change and expect the Provincial Government to step up as they should, if they themselves are intent on saying one thing, to put critics at bay for a while whilst they continue doing as they have been doing all along.
To continue with a program whose performance is highlighted by the re-integration of 43 individuals per annum per Safe Space with rate payer’s millions is beyond far fetched and ludicrous.
The City then lists what they refer to as the challenges of, and challenges associated with, rough sleeping, but in effect this is where they now blame everything on the National Government again.
They mention that the lack of an overarching national framework constitutes a large policy deficit, which has led to an incoherent homelessness policy and strategy at all government levels.
The City goes on to make yet another mistake in blaming the national government for being bureaucratically constrained, and lacking in innovative and proactive measures as well as funding to address the issue. It is within this context that the City has spent significant effort, as well as funding, to address rough sleeping.
This is false. The National Government has without a doubt failed in not having produced its own guiding policy and the funding for social development is without a doubt never enough but, if the City is honest it is the Provincial Department that is mandated to introduce programs, distribute the funds, monitor their spend and evaluate the services being offered by the service providers being paid to provide the services. And it is through the Provincial Department’s reporting that funding is adjusted annually by the National Department.
Only a year ago, in the National Assembly, and in response to a DA member, the National Minister of Social Development read out the figures provided by the Western Cape Provincial Government to her Department.
According to the Western Cape Department, there are 41 street children in the entire Western Cape and they are all accommodated in shelters. They go on to claim that we have 748 unaccommodated adults in total living on the streets of the entire Western Cape. This depicts chronic cluelessness.
The Western Cape Department of Social Development’s and the Western Cape Provincial Government’s lack of interest and involvement in addressing the issue of homelessness is exemplified by the fact that in the entire 5 years of his term as Premier, Alan Winde has in his all his annual budget speeches, featured the words “Homeless” and “Homelessness” twice.
PART ONE OF MY ANALYSIS: https://www.iol.co.za/capeargus/the-dignity-project/a-response-to-the-citys-strategy-to-reduce-rough-sleeping-7004f984-4e78-4ea9-80b5-e142d9338ce1
PART TWO OF MY ANALYSIS
https://www.busrep.co.za/capeargus/the-dignity-project/part-two-a-response-to-the-citys-strategy-to-reduce-rough-sleeping-5d50f309-f712-4590-97b9-30dcd9820aa0