Naath Strategic Council

  • Home
  • Naath Strategic Council

Naath Strategic Council Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from Naath Strategic Council, Political organisation, .

No to fake peace ✌️ Implement the 2018 peace agreement if you are looking for peace ✌️!Your first step should be releasi...
01/02/2026

No to fake peace ✌️
Implement the 2018 peace agreement if you are looking for peace ✌️!

Your first step should be releasing all the political detainees and then that will mean that you are serious about peace

09/01/2026

GATWECH PUOCH MAR WEANG!

08/01/2026

Press Release
08/01/2028

As per the recent error in communication that resulted in the unexpected acquisition of three NGO vehicles in Walgak, Akobo County by some armed individuals who faked a document in the name of Sector 3 CDR, Maj. Gen. John Luk, the SPLA-IO Acting Chief of General Staffs, Lt. Gen. Peter Thok Chuol Lual would like to inform all the concerned and the affected parties that this incident was regrettable and will be rectified expeditiously with anyone found culpable held to account.

As stated numerous times, the SPLA-IO take civilian protection – which includes all the courageous NGOs and their staff operating and working in our areas of control, very seriously.

Col. Lam Paul Gabriel
SPLA-IO Spokesperson

12/06/2025

Listen and reflect

This short notes serve to inform civilians displaced in Nasir and Ulang that, the food air dropped early today  in Nasir...
24/05/2025

This short notes serve to inform civilians displaced in Nasir and Ulang that, the food air dropped early today in Nasir town with subsequent launching you are seeing on social media was not an aid coming from the World Food Program (WFP).

The food is from the regime in Juba bought in Uganda and the safety of that food is in question because it is a miracle for the Government of South Sudan to provide food to her citizens since she gained independence.

Nasir and Ulang over the last three months were recorded as the only places on earth where, the same government used chemical weapons on her innocents civilians. Surprisingly,the same government is now claiming to provide food.

Another critical issue is that, no civilians in Nasir and Ulang towns and the question you should ask yourself is how can the same regime who burned down, bombed and displaced civilians be the same to provide them with safe food and in Nasir town which they currently used as military barrack?

I therefore, urge our displaced people to distant themselves from that food main for luring and trapping innocents people.

Kech Nguoth Tiem
Acting Chairperson of Relief Organization for South Sudan (SPLM IO)

The Many SPLMs Within SPLM-IG — A House DividedBy Dr Deng Bol Aruai BolThe Sudan People’s Liberation Movement in Governm...
21/05/2025

The Many SPLMs Within SPLM-IG — A House Divided

By Dr Deng Bol Aruai Bol

The Sudan People’s Liberation Movement in Government (SPLM-IG) is currently experiencing a deepening internal fragmentation, with multiple factions emerging inside the party’s ranks. While the SPLM-IG continues to function under a unified name, its internal structure is increasingly defined by parallel centers of influence, diverging loyalties, and uneven access to decision-making authority.

At present, the following groupings can be observed:

• SPLM – Kiir, Bol, Apai, Kun

This group constitutes the current governing core of the SPLM-IG. It includes President Salva Kiir and his closest allies, many of whom hold key executive positions. This bloc is central to both party decisions and national governance, with policy authority firmly concentrated around the presidency.

• SPLM – Wani, Awet, Kuol, Nhial

Composed of longstanding SPLM veterans who have served in various high-level positions over the years, this group has gradually been pushed to the political margins. Though still respected and formally present, they play a limited role in active party strategy or national policy direction.

• SPLM – Nyandeng, Deng, Majak, Madut

This group occupies senior government roles and continues to participate in state institutions. However, their influence within the SPLM-IG’s inner decision-making circle remains minimal. While nominally part of the government, they have little to no authority over key policy or party directions. Their participation is largely symbolic, with strategic and operational decisions centralized around President Kiir.

• SPLM – Taban, Chiengjiek, Thoi, Agel

These individuals represent a pragmatic bloc that has shifted alliances over time. Though quieter at present, they have retained political space within the system, operating independently and maintaining networks that could become influential depending on how internal dynamics evolve.

• SPLM – Pagan, Oyai, Kosti, Hiteng

This group includes high-profile SPLM figures now outside the formal political establishment. Though removed from daily governance, they continue to articulate positions on national affairs and retain symbolic influence, particularly within opposition circles and among international observers.

The concentration of decision-making authority in the hands of President Kiir is a defining feature of the current SPLM-IG structure. Both party and government affairs are heavily centralized, limiting meaningful consultation or consensus-building within broader leadership bodies. This top-down approach has led to increasing dissatisfaction and disengagement among senior figures who continue to hold office but exercise no real power.

Within each of these camps are additional layers of complexity—regional loyalties, generational divides, and informal networks that further fragment the party’s internal cohesion. In the coming period, more realignments are expected as leaders reassess their standing and explore new configurations of political leverage.

From an organizational perspective, the SPLM-IG now functions more as a collection of internal alliances than as a single party with unified leadership and policy coherence. The implications of this fragmentation are significant—not only for the party’s stability, but for the country’s political direction in the months ahead.

20/05/2025

- In 2008, Wani Igga relinquished his position as the first Deputy Chairperson following the SPLM Convention tension in Yei. - In 2013, Wani Igga was appointed the Vice President as a replacement of Dr. Riek Machar and later reappointed as the First Deputy chairperson of the SPLM. - In 2015, Wani Igga was forced to relinquished his position and Dr. Riek Machar reclaimed his position back as the First Vice President whereas Wani Igga remained as the Vice President. - In 2016, Taban Deng G*i replaced Dr. Riek Machar as the First Vice President. He was placed above Wani Igga in the government hierarchy. - In 2018, Dr. Riek Machar reclaimed his position as the First Vice President whereas Wani Igga and Taban Deng G*i became Vice Presidents with the same powers. - In 2025, Wani Igga was removed as the Vice President and replaced by Benjamin Bol Mel. However, he maintained his SPLM First Deputy Chairperson and appointed as the Secretary General. - In 2025, Wani Igga was removed as the Deputy Chairperson of the SPLM and Benjamin Bol Mel appointed as the First Vice Chairperson of the Party.That's a political journey of Prof. Dr. Wani Igga

Latest Update: SPLM-IO Rejected STEPHEN PAR KUOL’S  Coup
20/05/2025

Latest Update: SPLM-IO Rejected STEPHEN PAR KUOL’S Coup

Major General Gatwech Puoch Defects to SPLM/A-IO, Blames Government for Peace Deal Collapse and Ethnic ViolenceJuba, Sou...
14/05/2025

Major General Gatwech Puoch Defects to SPLM/A-IO, Blames Government for Peace Deal Collapse and Ethnic Violence

Juba, South Sudan – May 14, 2025 — Major General Gatwech Puoch has officially defected from the South Sudan People's Defense Forces (SSPDF) and declared allegiance to the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army-In Opposition (SPLM/A-IO), citing systematic violations of the peace agreement and targeted violence against civilians.

In a public statement, Gen. Puoch said his decision followed “careful consideration” of the country’s deteriorating political and security situation. He accused the SPLM-In-Government (SPLM-IG) of deliberately undermining the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS), contributing to ongoing instability.

Among the incidents he highlighted was the deadly confrontation in Nasir, where numerous civilians and military officers — including General David Majur Dak and Tor Gille — lost their lives. Puoch asserted this tragedy could have been avoided had the government honored its commitment to deploy the Necessary Unified Forces (NUF) under the peace deal.

He also condemned the SPLM-IG-controlled SSPDF, reportedly supported by the Ugandan People’s Defence Force (UPDF), for engaging in aerial bombardments and scorched-earth campaigns in Nuer areas. He alleged the use of chemical weapons and attacks on hospitals, describing them as “intentional” and targeting non-military infrastructure.

Gen. Puoch further accused the government of using state resources to pursue the ethnic agenda of the Jieng Council of Elders (JCE), thereby marginalizing other communities and deepening tribal divisions.

“The SPLM-IG has dishonored nearly every major provision of the peace agreement,” Puoch stated, referring to violations in security arrangements, power-sharing responsibilities, and the controversial arrest of SPLM/A-IO Chairman and First Vice President Dr. Riek Machar Teny. He also claimed the government sponsored an internal coup within the SPLM/A-IO and has since intimidated or arrested dissenters.

“I refuse to be complicit in actions that harm my people and serve a divisive government,” he declared. “I condemn, in the strongest terms, the ethnic profiling of specific communities and the militarization of tribal agendas.”

Gen. Puoch called on all South Sudanese citizens who believe in peace, justice, and national unity to join him in supporting the SPLM/A-IO’s struggle for reform and stability.

His defection comes at a critical moment for South Sudan’s fragile peace process, raising new concerns over the durability of the current transitional government and the growing risk of renewed civil conflict.

Explanation of Vote at the Adoption of a UN Security Council Resolution Renewing the Mandate of the UN Peacekeeping Miss...
09/05/2025

Explanation of Vote at the Adoption of a UN Security Council Resolution Renewing the Mandate of the UN Peacekeeping Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS)

Ambassador Dorothy Shea
Acting U.S. Representative
New York, New York
May 8, 2025

AS DELIVERED

Thank you, Mr. President. First, let me convey my appreciation to all the troop- and police-contributing countries for their service and sacrifice in supporting peace in South Sudan. UNMISS leadership and peacekeepers play an important role in South Sudan as the security situation in the country continues to deteriorate.

As we renew this mandate, South Sudan is on the brink of a broader civil war. With mounting tensions and escalating violence, the need for peace is paramount. In this light, we are voting in favor of the resolution extending the mandate of UNMISS. The international community must use its influence to bring South Sudan back from the brink, including through UNMISS.

The impact of the conflict on the people of South Sudan is alarming. We are troubled by reports of ground attacks, aerial bombardments, indiscriminate use of barrel bombs, and the unconscionable attack on May 3 on a Medecins Sans Frontiers hospital. These attacks have killed many civilians and displaced tens of thousands. They also indicate a possible return to ethnic conflict.

With the continued detention of First Vice President Machar and senior SPLM-IO officials, military operations against Nuer-majority areas, and continued unilateral actions taken by President Kiir, the government’s legitimacy, which is based on the 2018 peace agreement, is at risk.

The people of South Sudan deserve peace, freedom to participate in civic and political processes, and a government that is responsive to their needs.

The transitional government, however, has failed to take the steps required to peacefully conclude the transitional period, and has shown no political will to implement the peace agreement, making UNMISS’ role increasingly difficult.

The transitional government continues to impose movement restrictions on UNMISS, significantly undermining its ability to fulfill its protection of civilians mandate, and has continued with its unacceptable request that UNMISS vacate its Tomping headquarters. We insist that UNMISS be allowed to carry out its mandate without hindrance, as is reflected in the mandate.

The United States is committed to the UN returning to its foundational purpose of maintaining international peace and security. The potential of the system is commendable, but it has fallen quite far from its original mission. Peacekeeping mandates, including this one, should not pursue ideological goals that are difficult to define and even more challenging to implement on the ground, but rather focus on core Chapter VII functions.

In short, as I hope we can all agree, the goal of UNMISS should be to render itself unnecessary by ushering in a lasting peace. The day that a peacekeeping operation is no longer required in South Sudan will be a bright one indeed.

Mr. President, to attain peace and prevent resumed civil war, the transitional government must act with all urgency to end the violence, de-escalate political tensions, release First Vice President Machar from house arrest, and open a dialogue between the parties to the conflict.

Finally, given the transitional government’s inaction to date, the United States reiterates its position that allocating further financial resources for election preparations, given yet another election delay, is irresponsible. We look forward to a time when South Sudan’s leaders have created the conditions for free and fair elections. Then, and only then, should the Council consider additional support.

President Trump has been crystal clear that the United States will champion the noble cause of peace; the success of this Council will be determined by the conflicts that we end. Now is the time to vanquish the scourge of war from South Sudan.

President, we look forward to working with fellow Council members to ensure UNMISS is supported by the transitional government in the coming year, and we implore fellow Council members to press South Sudan’s leaders for an urgent, peaceful solution to the ongoing conflict.

I thank you.

# # #

Address


Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Naath Strategic Council posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

  • Want your organization to be the top-listed Government Service?

Share