03/28/2025
Recently, Nicholas County Schools learned that a substitute service employee had been employed in error. Upon learning this information, the individual was immediately released and has been terminated.
The Board hired the former employee for 2024 summer service employment work and subsequently assigned the employee to maintenance substitute assignments for the 2024-25 school year.
All county employment offers are contingent upon a successful background check by the West Virginia State Police. The employee’s background check indicated a prior criminal proceeding that was “dismissed.” There were no results indicating a “conviction”, “guilty plea”, “plea agreement”, or a plea of “no contest”. Neither Human Resources nor the superintendent were aware that the former employee had any prior plea agreement (no contest plea), nor that he was required to register as a s*x offender. With that said, the former employee did make the disclosure on this application and Human Resources did not thoroughly review that disclosure and instead relied solely on the background check of the State Police. That was clearly an error on administration’s part to rely on the background check and to not thoroughly review the application.
The school system has consulted the West Virginia Department of Education as a resource as it relates to the background check by the State Police. In consultation with the WVDE, it appears that the former employee’s charge was not in his criminal history. As we understand it, at the time (2017), the former employee was not fingerprinted following his plea agreement and so it was not tracked. In addition, the former employee’s s*x offender status was not in his criminal history. While not certain, that could be as a result of the fingerprint issue. Regardless, there is no excuse in administration’s failure to thoroughly review the actual application. While individuals who are on the s*x registry are not prohibited from being on school grounds, the employment recommendation would have never occurred had administration known of the plea agreement terms, which included s*x offender registration.
While the former employee is the step-grandson of the superintendent, the superintendent had no knowledge of the plea agreement terms, and of course was unaware that he was registered as a s*x offender. The superintendent had no involvement in the application, application review, or the background check process. Regardless, the superintendent recognizes that the school system made significant mistakes in the employment process related to the background of the former employee, and that as the superintendent, he bears that responsibility and makes no excuses.
While the school system is disappointed and troubled by learning this information, it renews its commitment to thoroughly review background checks including those in which any remote question of a prior record exists, and to thoroughly review disclosures made by applicants in the application process. We reassure the public there was absolutely no nefarious intent on anyone’s behalf to hire this individual. Instead, once Human Resources was made aware, employment ended immediately. While there was no nefarious intent, mistakes were made and administration recognizes those mistakes. Those mistakes rightfully have caused many emotions from the community, whether disbelief, anger, distrust, etc., and the superintendent recognizes that under his leadership administration failed to meet expectations that it should be held to, and for that, he apologizes. It has been the practice of Superintendent Beam to be as transparent as possible, thus this post is designed for that purpose.