My Work, 851 Jehovah Drive Rocky Mount, VA 24151, New York, NY (2026)

06/02/2026

Ruth Bader Ginsburg stood before the Supreme Court with a case that confused almost everyone who heard about it.

She was arguing a gender discrimination case.

But her client wasn't a woman.

Stephen Wiesenfeld was a thirty-year-old widower from New Jersey. His wife Paula had died during childbirth, leaving him alone with their infant son Jason.

Paula had been the family's primary earner. She'd worked as a teacher her entire adult life, paying into Social Security with every paycheck.

When she died, Stephen applied for Social Security survivor benefits so he could stay home and care for Jason instead of immediately returning to work.

The Social Security Administration denied his claim.

The reason was simple, they explained: survivor benefits for child-rearing were only available to widows. Not widowers.

The law assumed that mothers naturally stayed home with children. So when a husband died, the widow needed financial support to continue her caregiving role.

But fathers? The law assumed they'd keep working. That someone else—a grandmother, an aunt, a hired woman—would care for the children.

The idea that a father might want to raise his own child wasn't even considered.

Stephen was devastated. Not just by losing Paula, but by a legal system that told him his relationship with his son didn't matter the same way a mother's would.

That's when he found Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Ruth had been building toward this moment for years.

As a law student in the 1950s, she'd watched qualified women get turned away from jobs simply because of their gender. She'd experienced it herself—graduating at the top of her class at Columbia Law School, yet struggling to find a firm willing to hire a woman.

By the 1970s, she was working with the ACLU's Women's Rights Project, developing a strategic approach to dismantling gender discrimination in American law.

But Ruth understood something many equality advocates didn't:

You couldn't achieve women's equality by only arguing for women's rights.

The entire system of rigid gender roles had to be challenged. And sometimes, the best way to do that was to show how those roles harmed men too.

When Ruth heard Stephen's story, she knew she'd found the perfect case.

A man being denied benefits because the law assumed fathers didn't really parent.

A man who'd lost his wife and was now being told by his own government that his desire to raise his child was legally irrelevant.

Ruth took the case and began building her argument.

Inside the Supreme Court chamber, Ruth stood before nine male justices and made her case.

The Social Security law, she argued, rested on outdated stereotypes that hurt everyone.

It assumed women were caregivers, not breadwinners—which denied women economic equality.

It assumed men were breadwinners, not caregivers—which denied men the right to be fully present parents.

It trapped both genders in rigid roles, then used law to enforce those roles even when they didn't match reality.

Stephen Wiesenfeld wanted to raise his son. He wanted to be the parent who was there for every milestone, every difficult moment, every ordinary day.

Why should the law prevent him from doing what any widowed mother would be supported in doing?

The justices listened.

Some had daughters who wanted careers. Some had seen their own wives struggle against limitations. Some were beginning to recognize that the world was changing, and maybe the law needed to change with it.

On March 19, 1975, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Stephen Wiesenfeld's favor.

The law discriminated based on gender stereotypes. It violated the Constitution's equal protection guarantee.

Fathers had the same right to raise their children as mothers. Caregiving wasn't a women's role—it was a human role.

The decision was revolutionary.

Not because it gave men something they'd been asking for. Men as a group hadn't been demanding survivor benefits. Most didn't even know they were excluded.

It was revolutionary because it forced the legal system to confront its own assumptions.

If fathers could be caregivers, then caregiving wasn't naturally feminine.

If mothers could be breadwinners, then earning wasn't naturally masculine.

And if these roles weren't natural, then laws couldn't use gender as a proxy for ability, interest, or responsibility.

The entire structure began to crack.

Ruth didn't stop with the Wiesenfeld case.

She kept going. Case after case, she challenged gender-based laws that limited everyone.

She represented a male Air Force officer denied dependent benefits for his wife that female officers automatically received for their husbands.

She challenged laws that gave women automatic exemptions from jury duty—arguing that this "privilege" actually reinforced the idea that women's participation in public life wasn't important.

She fought state laws that set different drinking ages for men and women, showing how even seemingly minor gender classifications reinforced harmful stereotypes.

Every case was strategic. Every plaintiff carefully chosen. Every argument designed to show that gender equality wasn't about women winning at men's expense.

It was about dismantling a system that restricted everyone.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated to the Supreme Court in 1993. She served until her death in 2020.

By then, the legal landscape she'd helped create was so different from the one she'd entered that younger generations struggled to imagine how things had been.

But the work isn't finished.

America still doesn't have universal paid parental leave. Most new fathers don't take extended time off to care for infants, often because they can't afford to or because workplace culture penalizes them for prioritizing family.

Women still face career penalties for taking maternity leave. They're still more likely to scale back work to accommodate caregiving. They're still paid less on average, partly because the economy devalues work associated with caregiving.

The legal structure of formal equality exists now, thanks largely to Ruth's work.

But cultural equality—the kind where fathers feel truly supported in being caregivers and mothers don't face penalties for having careers—that's still being built.

Stephen Wiesenfeld raised his son Jason. He was there for homework, for parent-teacher conferences, for baseball games and birthday parties.

06/02/2026

The uniform was new, pressed sharp with military precision. The badge felt heavy in Airman 1st Class Sylvia Stallings's hand. But the weight she carried that spring morning in 1972 went far beyond standard-issue equipment.

She was about to become the first.

When Sylvia reported for duty at the 49th Security Police Squadron at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico on April 4, 1972, she wasn't just starting a new assignment. She was opening a door that had been closed to women since the Air Force's founding twenty-five years earlier. Security police—base law enforcement and protection—had been an exclusively male domain. Until now.

The path to that moment began years earlier, long before Sylvia ever considered military service. Women had served in the U.S. military in various capacities since World War II, but always with restrictions. The Women in the Air Force (WAF) program, established in 1948, allowed women to serve—but only in certain roles deemed "appropriate." They could be nurses, administrators, communications specialists. They could support the mission, but they couldn't protect it.

That didn't sit right with many, including the women who knew they were capable of more.

By the early 1970s, the military was beginning to reconsider these limitations. The changing social landscape, the women's movement, and the simple reality that talented women were being turned away from roles they could excel in—all of these factors converged. In 1972, the Air Force made a decision: open security police positions to qualified women.

Sylvia Stallings was ready.

We don't know all the details of her childhood, what made her want to serve, or what obstacles she overcame to get to Holloman Air Force Base. But we know this: she raised her hand. She volunteered to be first. And being first is never easy.

Imagine walking into a squadron where every face looks surprised to see you. Where the facilities weren't designed with you in mind. Where some colleagues welcome you and others question whether you belong. Where every action is scrutinized because you're not just representing yourself—you're representing every woman who might follow.

That was Sylvia's reality.

As a security police officer, her duties were serious and demanding. She was responsible for law enforcement on base—responding to incidents, conducting patrols, protecting personnel and property. In the Cold War era, with tensions high and military installations being critical infrastructure, security police work was essential to national defense. These weren't ceremonial duties or token assignments. This was real police work, requiring physical fitness, mental toughness, sound judgment, and courage.

Sylvia had all of those qualities. And she proved it every single day.

The significance of April 4, 1972, extends far beyond one woman and one base. Sylvia's success—and the success of the women who followed her in those early years—demonstrated what should have been obvious all along: women could excel in any role they were trained for. They could handle the physical demands. They could make split-second decisions under pressure. They could earn the respect of their colleagues through professionalism and competence.

Every barrier that falls creates a path for others. When Sylvia put on that uniform and reported for duty, she made it easier for the next woman, and the next, and the thousands who followed. Today, women serve in every branch of the U.S. military, in every capacity, including combat roles that weren't opened until decades after Sylvia's pioneering service. They fly fighter jets, command ships, lead special operations units, and yes, serve as security forces protecting our bases worldwide.

None of that happens without the firsts. The pioneers. The women who walked through doors they had to push open themselves.

The military is stronger because of them. Research has consistently shown that diverse teams perform better, make better decisions, and are more adaptable. By integrating women fully into all military roles, the armed forces gained access to a larger talent pool and became more effective. What began as a matter of fairness became a strategic advantage.

But beyond statistics and strategic benefits, there's something more fundamental at stake. Every young woman who dreams of serving her country in whatever capacity she chooses needs to know that the path is open. She needs to see that someone like her has done it before. She needs heroes who look like her.

Sylvia Stallings is one of those heroes.

We often celebrate military heroism in terms of dramatic battlefield actions—the medal-worthy moments of extraordinary courage under fire. Those are important and deserve recognition. But there's another kind of courage that's equally vital: the courage to be first. The courage to face skepticism and prove doubters wrong through quiet professionalism. The courage to endure extra scrutiny without complaint. The courage to know that your success or failure will be used to judge everyone who shares your gender.

06/02/2026

They called him "Mush" because that's how he ordered his sled dogs as a boy in Kentucky—"Mush! Mush!"—urging them forward through snow. The nickname stuck through the Naval Academy, through years of service, through a war where forward was the only direction he knew.

Commander Dudley Walker Morton didn't believe in caution. He believed in attack.

Born in 1907, Morton grew up competitive, fearless, and impatient with anything that resembled hesitation. By World War II, when he took command of USS Wahoo in late 1942, submarine warfare was evolving from a cautious, defensive strategy into something far more aggressive. Morton would push that evolution further than anyone.

Traditional submarine doctrine was careful: stay deep, attack at night, avoid detection. Submarines were meant to be invisible hunters, patient and methodical.

Morton threw that playbook away.

He attacked in daylight. He surfaced to chase targets with his deck gun. He charged into harbors where enemy ships thought they were safe. He fired torpedoes at point-blank range, so close his crew could see the faces of enemy sailors before impact.

His executive officer was Richard O'Kane, who would later become the most successful submarine commander in U.S. history. Together, Morton and O'Kane developed tactics that seemed reckless but were actually calculated aggression backed by exceptional skill.

They positioned Wahoo differently—using the periscope from the conning tower while O'Kane handled approach calculations, allowing Morton to focus entirely on target acquisition and attack. This teamwork made them devastatingly effective.

Between January and July 1943, Wahoo completed five war patrols that became legendary. Morton hunted in the Yellow Sea, the East China Sea, the approaches to Tokyo. He didn't just sink ships—he hunted them down like prey.

In January 1943, during one patrol, Wahoo pe*****ted Wewak Harbor in New Guinea—a heavily defended Japanese base—and attacked in broad daylight. Morton sank a destroyer at such close range that Wahoo barely escaped the depth charges. His radio message afterward was characteristically bold: "Another running gun battle. Destroyer sunk. All well."

The successes mounted. Tankers. Freighters. Troop transports. Each sinking disrupted Japanese supply lines, weakened their war effort, bought time for Allied offensives. Oil burned on Pacific waters. Survivors floated among wreckage. The name "Wahoo" became feared by Japanese merchant sailors and celebrated by American submariners.

Morton's men loved him. He was demanding but fair, aggressive but not careless with their lives. He led from the front. When he ordered an attack, he was right there in the conning tower, sharing the danger. That kind of leadership inspires loyalty that survives death.

By mid-1943, Wahoo had sunk approximately twenty ships—the exact number remains debated, but regardless of precise count, it was extraordinary. Morton became the face of submarine warfare. His photo appeared in newspapers. Other submarine commanders studied his tactics. Young officers wanted to serve under him.

But exceptional success made Wahoo a priority target.

In September 1943, Morton received orders for his seventh patrol: pe*****te the Sea of Japan.

The Sea of Japan was submarine hell. It's an enclosed sea, accessible only through narrow straits that Japan had heavily mined and patrolled. Once inside, submarines faced constant air patrols, numerous destroyers, and limited escape routes. Water depth was often too shallow to evade effectively. It was a trap where even the best submarine could be cornered.

Several submarines had been sent into the Sea of Japan. Almost none returned.

Morton knew the risks. His crew knew them. But orders were orders, and there were valuable targets inside—troop transports, supply ships supporting Japan's garrisons in Manchuria and Korea. Someone had to hunt them.

On August 8, 1943, Wahoo departed Pearl Harbor on what would be her final patrol.

For weeks, family and friends back home received no news—standard for submarine operations. Radio silence was survival. But as September turned to October, concern grew. Wahoo was overdue.

What happened on October 11, 1943, remained a mystery for over sixty years.

Japanese records, examined after the war, indicated aircraft spotted a submarine in La Perouse Strait between Hokkaido and Sakhalin Island—one of the narrow passages Wahoo would have used to exit the Sea of Japan. The submarine was attacked with depth charges. Oil and debris surfaced. No survivors were seen.

That was all anyone knew.

Eighty men—Commander Morton, Executive Officer O'Kane's replacement (O'Kane had transferred before this patrol to command his own boat), engineers, torpedomen, cooks, young sailors barely out of training—vanished into cold water.

No radio call. No final message. No bodies recovered. No grave except the Pacific floor.

Morton was thirty-six years old. He'd been married for ten years. He had a daughter who would grow up with only photographs of her father, stories of his courage, and the permanent absence that war creates.

The Navy listed Wahoo as "presumed lost" and eventually declared the crew dead. Morton received the Navy Cross for his earlier patrols. Life moved on because war demands that survivors keep fighting, keep living, keep moving forward even as friends disappear beneath waves.

06/02/2026

In 1967, somewhere in the jungle heat of South Vietnam, Angie Dickinson stood on a makeshift stage wearing an evening gown, singing Christmas carols to soldiers who might not live to see the new year.

Minutes after she left, mortar rounds hit the camp.

This wasn't a movie scene. This was Angie Dickinson's real life—one that Hollywood rarely tells you about.

Before she became a household name, before she broke barriers on television, before she was an icon, Angie Dickinson was a young woman from North Dakota with big dreams and bigger determination. She entered the 1953 Miss America pageant representing California, turning heads not just with beauty but with a magnetic presence that suggested something more than pageantry.

Hollywood noticed.

By the late 1950s, she was climbing the ladder of stardom, landing television appearances and small film roles. Then came 1959 and Rio Bravo—a Howard Hawks Western opposite John Wayne and Dean Martin that would change everything. Her performance as Feathers, a saloon girl with grit and grace, earned her a Golden Globe and established her as more than just another pretty face. She could act. She had screen presence. She belonged among legends.

Fame opened doors. Angie could have simply enjoyed the glamorous life—premieres, magazine covers, lucrative contracts. But in the early 1960s, as America's involvement in Vietnam escalated and young men deployed to a distant jungle war, she received a phone call that would define her character.

Bob Hope was organizing USO tours to entertain troops overseas. He wanted star power—names that would mean something to soldiers far from home. He called Angie Dickinson.

She said yes immediately.

Starting in 1964, Angie embarked on tours that would continue through the most intense years of the Vietnam War. This wasn't a publicity stunt or a brief photo opportunity. She went back, year after year, to some of the most dangerous combat zones in Southeast Asia.

December 1968. Lai Khe and Long Binh. Two bases that regularly came under attack. The weather was miserable—torrential rain turning dirt into mud, humidity that made breathing feel like drowning. Security threats loomed constantly. Intelligence reports warned of increased enemy activity. Any sane person would have questioned being there.

Angie took the stage anyway.

She sang. She joked. She looked into the eyes of young men—boys, really, many barely out of high school—who had seen things no one should see. Some had lost friends days earlier. Some would be in combat within hours. All of them were exhausted, terrified, and desperately homesick.

For those precious moments, she gave them something else to think about. She represented everything they were fighting for—home, beauty, normalcy, hope. She wasn't performing for critics or cameras. She was performing for survival—theirs and her own sense of purpose.

"I wanted to lift their spirits," she later reflected, "but they always wound up lifting mine."

That statement wasn't celebrity humility. It was truth. Angie witnessed courage that humbled her. She met soldiers who maintained humanity in inhuman conditions, who protected each other with brotherly love, who still found reasons to laugh despite living with death. They taught her about resilience, about sacrifice, about what truly matters.

But the danger was real.

In 1967, during one tour, Angie narrowly escaped a Viet Cong attack. The exact details vary in different accounts—some say it was mortar fire, others mention small arms attacks on convoys—but the reality is undisputed: she came close to being killed or captured. Like Ann-Margret (who also served extensively on USO tours), Angie experienced firsthand the terror that soldiers lived with daily.

She could have stopped. One close call would have been enough justification to say, "I did my part." No one would have blamed her for choosing safety over service.

She went back.

Her final live Christmas show in Vietnam came on December 24, 1972. By then, American involvement was winding down, but soldiers still needed to know they weren't forgotten. Angie showed up on Christmas Eve—when she could have been anywhere else in the world—to remind them someone cared.

But here's what makes her story truly extraordinary: the service didn't end when the cameras turned off.

Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, Angie quietly visited VA hospitals across America. No press releases. No photo opportunities. Just a movie star spending time with wounded veterans, listening to their stories, holding their hands, looking them in the eyes and saying thank you. Some were amputees. Some were burned beyond recognition. Some were battling invisible wounds that would haunt them forever.

She showed up anyway. She didn't look away. She didn't treat them as broken or pitiable. She treated them as heroes, because that's what they were.

These visits were never about her image. They were about honoring promises made in Vietnam—that she would remember them, that their sacrifices mattered, that they weren't just numbers or statistics.

Meanwhile, her career continued soaring. In 1974, she took on a role that would change television history: Sergeant Pepper Anderson in Police Woman. It was the first hour-long drama headlined by a woman, a groundbreaking moment when female characters were largely relegated to supporting roles or sitcoms.

Pepper Anderson was smart, tough, capable, and complex. She carried a gun, made arrests, went undercover in dangerous situations, and commanded respect in a male-dominated profession. The show ran for four seasons and directly inspired a wave of women to enter law enforcement—a career path previously considered almost exclusively male.

Angie didn't just play a pioneering character. She was a pioneer, opening doors for women both in entertainment and in real-world professions. Police departments across America reported increased female applications during and after the show's run. Women saw Sergeant Anderson and thought, "I could do that."

Decades have passed since Angie's Vietnam tours, since Police Woman broke barriers, since she quietly visited hospitals filled with wounded veterans. She's now in her 90s, her Hollywood career long concluded. But her legacy endures in ways that transcend box office numbers or awards.

Veterans remember. The ones who saw her perform in sweltering heat or pouring rain, who shook her hand at VA hospitals, who drew strength from her presence when they needed it most—they remember. And they've told their children and grandchildren about the movie star who cared enough to risk her life for them.

Law enforcement remembers. Women who became police officers because they saw Sergeant Pepper Anderson and realized they belonged in that profession—they remember the barrier she broke.

Hollywood remembers. Every actress who headlines a drama, who plays strong female characters, who proves that women can carry productions—they walk through doors Angie helped open.

Angie Dickinson's story isn't just about fame. It's about character revealed under pressure. It's about using privilege and platform to serve others. It's about courage that extends beyond scripts and sets into real life where consequences are permanent.

She could have stayed safe in Hollywood, collecting paychecks and accolades. Instead, she flew into war zones. She sat with the wounded. She broke barriers. She served.

This is what true class looks like. This is what real courage means. This is the kind of person we should celebrate—not just for talent, but for heart.

God bless Angie Dickinson, an American original who understood that with fame comes responsibility, that privilege demands service, and that true stars shine brightest when they illuminate others.

06/02/2026

Most people know Chuck Norris as an action hero, a martial arts legend, and the subject of countless internet jokes about his supposed invincibility. But behind the Hollywood tough-guy persona lies a profound personal tragedy that shaped his entire life—the loss of his younger brother in Vietnam.

On June 4, 1970, Private First Class Wieland Clyde Norris was serving with the legendary 101st Airborne Division in Thừa Thiên-Huế Province, Vietnam—one of the most dangerous regions in the country. The 101st, known as the "Screaming Eagles," saw some of the most intense combat of the entire war, and soldiers in that division faced enemy contact almost daily.

Wieland was 27 years old, a young man with his whole life ahead of him. Like hundreds of thousands of other young Americans, he had answered his country's call and volunteered to serve during one of the most controversial and challenging conflicts in American history. He didn't have to be there, but he believed in his duty.

On that fateful day in June, Wieland's platoon found themselves in a deadly situation. Enemy forces had them pinned down, and soldiers were in immediate danger of being overrun or killed. In that critical moment, when most people's instincts would tell them to seek cover and protect themselves, Wieland made a different choice.

He deliberately drew enemy fire away from his fellow soldiers, exposing himself to enemy guns to give his platoon members the precious seconds they needed to escape to safety. It was an act of extraordinary courage—the kind of selfless heroism that combat veterans speak of with reverence but that most people can never truly understand. Wieland knew what he was doing. He knew the risk. He did it anyway because his brothers-in-arms needed him.

Many soldiers made it to safety that day because of Wieland's sacrifice. They lived to come home, to have families, to grow old—all because a 27-year-old man from Oklahoma decided their lives were worth more than his own.

For his extraordinary bravery and selfless devotion to his fellow soldiers, Private First Class Wieland Norris was posthumously awarded the Purple Heart and other military honors recognizing his sacrifice. His name would be forever etched in the annals of the 101st Airborne Division's proud history.

But for Chuck Norris, his older brother, the awards and recognition couldn't fill the void left by Wieland's death. Years later, Chuck would describe it as "the single most tragic event of my life." In various interviews over the decades, he has spoken about the profound impact of losing his younger brother, saying, "He gave everything for his country. I carry his spirit every day."

That statement isn't just words. Chuck has spent decades proving it through his actions.

Many people don't realize that Chuck Norris himself is a veteran. From 1958 to 1962, he served honorably in the United States Air Force as an Air Policeman, achieving the rank of Airman First Class. He was stationed in South Korea at Osan Air Base, where a chance encounter would change his life forever.

While in Korea, Chuck discovered martial arts. He began training in Tang Soo Do, a Korean martial art, and quickly became obsessed with perfecting his skills. What started as a way to pass time during his military service would become his life's passion and eventually lead to his Hollywood career. But he never forgot where it all started—in service to his country.

When Wieland died in Vietnam, Chuck was already back in civilian life, building his martial arts career. The loss devastated him and his family in ways that would echo through the decades. But rather than letting grief consume him, Chuck chose to honor his brother's memory through action.

Chuck has dedicated numerous films to Wieland's memory, ensuring that his brother's sacrifice is never forgotten. In the credits of several of his movies, viewers can find dedications to Wieland—quiet tributes that most audiences might miss, but that meant everything to Chuck and his family.

More importantly, Chuck channeled his grief into a lifelong commitment to supporting veterans and active-duty service members. For decades, he has served as a spokesman for the Department of Veterans Affairs, using his celebrity platform to advocate for better healthcare, mental health support, and services for those who served. He has visited troops around the world through USO tours, bringing some comfort and entertainment to soldiers stationed far from home—soldiers like his brother once was.

Chuck has been a vocal advocate for veterans' health needs, particularly regarding Agent Orange exposure and PTSD treatment. He has spoken before Congress, appeared at countless veteran events, and used his influence to push for better care for those who served. He has been honored with titles including Honorary Marine, and received recognition as Veteran of the Year, acknowledgments of his tireless work on behalf of the military community.

But perhaps his most important work has been simply remembering—keeping Wieland's story alive, ensuring that his brother's sacrifice isn't forgotten in the passage of time. In a culture that often has a short memory, Chuck has been a constant reminder that every name on the Vietnam Memorial Wall represents a person with family, friends, and dreams that were cut short.

The Norris brothers' story represents something profound about service and sacrifice. Wieland gave his life on a battlefield in Southeast Asia, making the ultimate sacrifice so that others could live. Chuck has spent his life honoring that sacrifice, turning personal tragedy into a lifelong mission to support those who serve.

Their story reminds us that behind every uniform is a family—siblings, parents, children—whose lives are forever altered by service and sacrifice. It reminds us that supporting veterans isn't an abstract political issue, but a personal commitment to real people who have given real parts of themselves for our freedom.

Today, as we remember Private First Class Wieland Norris, we honor not just his heroic actions on June 4, 1970, but the ripple effect of his sacrifice. His brother Chuck carries his spirit every day, and through Chuck's advocacy and remembrance, millions of Americans have been reminded of the debt we owe to those who serve.

To the Norris family: your loss was profound, but Wieland's legacy lives on—in his brother's tireless advocacy, in the soldiers whose lives he saved that day in Vietnam, and in the countless veterans who have benefited from Chuck's decades of support work.

God bless Private First Class Wieland Norris. God bless Chuck Norris. And God bless all the families who have sacrificed so much for our freedom.

Rest in peace, hero. Your brother made sure we'd never forget. 🇺🇸

My Work

06/02/2026

06/02/2026

06/02/2026

06/02/2026

06/02/2026

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share