The Patuxent Partnership

The Patuxent Partnership TPP is the premier SOMD organization connecting the dots between government, industry and academia.

What a night at The Patuxent Partnership Annual Dinner! 🎉MIL was honored to be recognized as the 2025 Member of the Year...
06/04/2026

What a night at The Patuxent Partnership Annual Dinner! 🎉

MIL was honored to be recognized as the 2025 Member of the Year, and we could not be more proud to support an organization that continues to make a lasting impact across our community. As a platinum sponsor of TPP, we are grateful to partner with a group that brings together government, industry, and academia to advance STEM education, technology innovation, workforce development, and collaboration throughout Southern Maryland.

Thank you to The Patuxent Partnership for this incredible recognition and for all you do to strengthen the future of our community. We are excited to continue building partnerships, creating opportunities, and making a difference together.


The Toll Booth at the Throat of World TradeSujit RamanJune 2, 2026In late February 2026, Iran closed the Strait of Hormu...
06/03/2026

The Toll Booth at the Throat of World Trade
Sujit Raman
June 2, 2026
In late February 2026, Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz to foreign shipping. What began as a chaotic wartime closure has, in the past few days, hardened into something more consequential: an official sovereign toll regime, codified in Iranian law, and priced in cryptocurrency.
On May 18, Iran operationally launched the Persian Gulf Strait Authority, a formal state bureaucracy with its own internet domain (pgsa.ir), account on X, and contact email. Since then, Tehran has delineated a “management supervision area” across the strait and announced a transit-permit scheme that converts Hormuz from an international waterway into a vetted toll plaza.
Under the plan, which formalizes procedures that had developed over the previous several weeks, operators must apply to the Persian Gulf Strait Authority via email and submit a “Vessel Information Declaration” covering ownership, insurance, crew, cargo, and routing. They then will receive a transit permit after paying a fee of up to $2 million per voyage, though it appears some fee-less safe-passages can be negotiated bilaterally.
More recently, Tehran has layered on a bitcoin-priced maritime insurance program called “Hormuz Safe” that, according to the nation’s semi-official Fars news agency, could generate $10 billion annually.
The U.S. government has responded swiftly, sanctioning the Persian Gulf Strait Authority on May 27 and reiterating warnings against providing any toll payments to the Iranian regime.
It’s important to focus on the payment instruments that Iran accepts for passage, as well as on the associated infrastructure, because they matter just as much as the establishment of the tolls themselves — and will determine the ultimate effectiveness of any response.
The tolls are crypto-denominated, to be paid either in bitcoin transferred to wallets linked to the regime’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps or, according to reports, in dollar-pegged stablecoins. Payments have also been made through traditional bank wires, though even here there is a twist: The fees were settled in Chinese yuan routed through Kunlun Bank via the Cross-border Interbank Payment System, China’s Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications alternative. And while bitcoin and stablecoins are both cryptocurrencies — that is, digital currencies not issued by a central bank — they do have differing features, and those distinctions are doing real work in Iran’s broader strategy.
Indeed, while most readers are likely familiar with bitcoin, the Hormuz story should also draw attention to stablecoins, the less glamorous and more rapidly-growing part of the digital assets ecosystem — and the one with the deeper long-term geopolitical stakes.
Blockchain-based digital dollars have become load-bearing infrastructure in the contest over global economic power, quietly redrawing the architecture of international payments, empowering sanctioned regimes, and threatening authoritarian capital controls from within. The irony is that stablecoins were designed to be boring: Their very name denotes stable, reliable convertibility. And yet this modest-sounding instrument has, in a remarkably short time, become one of the most consequential financial technologies on the planet.
As a former federal prosecutor and senior U.S. Department of Justice official, I have worked at the nexus of emerging tech, illicit finance, and national security for over a decade. Today, I serve as an executive at a blockchain intelligence firm that has a commercial interest in this topic and supports both public and private sector entities in confronting financial crime. When I call for increased resources for blockchain analytics, I am not advocating for any specific platform or vendor, but rather for broader support of a rapidly developing field of intelligence that already has deep geopolitical impact.
Why Stablecoins Spread
Stablecoins solve a problem bitcoin cannot: they are stable enough to use as money. With a current total capitalization of roughly $260 billion, Tether and Circle dominate the market. And while a small cohort of non-dollar stablecoins pegged to the euro, the offshore Chinese yuan, the Russian ruble, and even gold have also emerged —with Hong Kong dollar-pegged instruments on the way — U.S. dollar-denominated coins still represented roughly 97 percent of the entire market as of 2025.
Read More here: https://warontherocks.com/the-toll-booth-at-the-throat-of-world-trade/?utm_campaign=dfn-ebb&utm_medium=email&utm_source=sailthru

TPP/ ANA PanelThe Webster Field Advantage: Where Engineering Meets the Flight Line”Tuesday, June 9, 2026 | 5:00 pm – 7:3...
05/21/2026

TPP/ ANA Panel
The Webster Field Advantage: Where Engineering Meets the Flight Line”
Tuesday, June 9, 2026 | 5:00 pm – 7:30 pm
Venue: PRNAM Flight Tech Hall
5pm: Refreshments 5:30pm: Panel begins

Explore the unique partnership between NAWCAD WOLF—the Navy’s rapid organic engineering capability and UX-24, the Navy’s only dedicated UAS test squadron.
Discuss how the proximity of engineering, prototyping, manufacturing, and flight testing at Webster Outlying Field in partnership with industry, provides benefits that can’t be found anywhere else.

Moderator
Debra G. Salamon, Executive Director, NAWCAD Mission Systems Group and Digital Analytics Infrastructure and Technology Advancement (DAiTA) Group
Speakers
Blaine Summers, Executive Director, Senior Scientific Technical Manager (SSTM), NAWCAD Webster, Outlying Field
CAPTAIN Timothy Lee Castro, Mission Director, Navy Reserves NAVAIR Systems Command Headquarters, NAS
Timothy P. Hickey, Rapid Capability Solutions Department Head, NAWCAD, Division Webster Outlying Field
Lt. Col. Jason N. Noll, UX-24 Commanding Officer, Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division

Register here: https://paxpartnership.org/tpp-events/tpp-ana-panel/

NAWCAD INDUSTRY DAYMay 27, 2026 | 8:00 am to 2:30 pmUSMSM – SMART Building44219 Airport Road | California, MD 20619Check...
05/12/2026

NAWCAD INDUSTRY DAY
May 27, 2026 | 8:00 am to 2:30 pm
USMSM – SMART Building
44219 Airport Road | California, MD 20619
Check-in begins at 7:30 am
No cost for attendance, but registration required.
Boxed lunch $16:00 per person (pay at registration).

Agenda on registration page
Registration now open: https://paxpartnership.org/tpp-events/nawcad-industry-day-2/

CMMC Level 2, Done Right: Scope CUI, Build Evidence, and Get Assessment-ReadyMay 13, 2026 01:00 PM  in  Eastern Time (US...
05/11/2026

CMMC Level 2, Done Right: Scope CUI, Build Evidence, and Get Assessment-Ready

May 13, 2026 01:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada) on Zoom

If your organization supports DoD or federal contracting and handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), CMMC Level 2 is where “basic safeguarding” becomes a structured, evidence-driven program. This webinar is designed for small and mid-sized organizations (primes and subcontractors) that need a clear, practical path to Level 2 readiness without over-scoping, overspending, or building a compliance program that can’t be sustained. In CMMC Part III, we will translate Level 2 into plain-English decisions your leadership, contracts, IT, security, compliance, and operations teams can execute—especially around scoping CUI, defining the assessment boundary, and building an evidence trail that holds up under review. Format: ~30–40 minutes of instruction + 10–20 minutes moderated live Q&A What You’ll Learn: By the end of this session, you will be able to: • Determine when Level 2 likely applies (CUI triggers and common edge cases) • Explain CUI scoping in plain English: where it lives, who touches it, and what’s in/out • Define a defensible Level 2 assessment boundary (including enclaves and shared services) • Understand what “objective evidence” looks like at Level 2 (SSP/POA&M, logs, tickets, reviews) • Identify the most common readiness gaps (identity/access, logging, vuln mgmt, IR, supplier/MSP responsibility) • Outline a practical 60–90 day readiness path and how to sustain compliance over time
Getting CMMC Level 2 Compliant
What we’re covering (plain-English, execution-focused):
• When Level 2 applies (and the edge cases that surprise people)
• How to scope CUI correctly and avoid dragging your whole company into the blast radius
• The asset categories that drive cost/effort (including cloud/MSP/shared services)
• What assessors expect to examine / interview / test
• How HIPAA / ITAR / PII overlap, and where they don’t
• A practical 30/60/90-day readiness plan you can actually execute
Register here: https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/Li-_H9gyTBeaVRa_I4D15A #/registration

05/06/2026

We’re just one day away.

Tomorrow, we’ll come together for our 2nd Annual Community Military Spouse Panel—a space to hear real stories, gain meaningful insight, and connect with a community that understands the unique intersection of military life and career growth.

From navigating PCS moves to redefining career paths, this conversation is about what’s possible—and how to get there.

Don’t forget: Precise Systems’ Recruiting team will be available for resume reviews and one-on-one guidance, so come ready with your questions.

We’re honored to host this event in collaboration with the Military Spouse Employment Partnership ( ), Spouse Education and Career Opportunities Program - SECO, and the NAS Pax River Fleet & Family Support Center.

There’s still time to join us—we’d love to see you there.
đź“… Thursday, May 7th | 3:00 pm EST
📍 Precise Systems HQ & Virtual
đź”— Register to attend our panel here: https://ow.ly/Q5mT50YRNNy

Acquisition Reform Needs Its Own WargameStephen BittnerMay 5, 2026One number buried in the Pentagon’s Fiscal Year 2027 b...
05/05/2026

Acquisition Reform Needs Its Own Wargame
Stephen Bittner
May 5, 2026
One number buried in the Pentagon’s Fiscal Year 2027 budget request reveals a decade of acquisition decisions in a data point: The U.S. Navy is requesting 785 Tomahawk cruise missiles. In 2025, Congress funded 55. That 1,200 percent jump is the cost of choices never stress-tested against the scenario unfolding today — a sustained air campaign against Iran while China watches the magazine drain.
As a congressional staffer, I watch acquisition reform proposals grind through the legislative machinery every day. A proposal usually arrives with a clean rationale: streamline this contracting mechanism, expand multi-year purchasing authority for this munitions line, lower an “other transaction authority” threshold so a nontraditional vendor can clear the so-called valley of death, and so on. The technical case is often sound, but the proposals lack projected operational impact in the following numerical form: “Under this reform, U.S. strike capacity at the start of a major contingency is X, and under the current process, it is Y.”
Without that number, every reform proposal arrives on a staffer’s desk as an assertion, and in an environment where the Pentagon and all the military services are simultaneously promoting competing packages, assertion is not enough. Defense committees already know the defense industrial base needs expansion, and demand signals need consistency. The gap is simpler than awareness. They need a number they can put in a markup document: a projected battlefield outcome tied to a specific statutory change that a member can defend in conference.
A reasonably skeptical Congress needs some means of comparing what the change would actually produce in strike capacity or production rate against the baseline of doing nothing. The tool that would produce the data does not exist. Building it is the most consequential near-term contribution Washington’s defense analysis community — the think-tanks and federally funded research and development centers with the wargaming infrastructure — could make to the current reform debate.
What Wargames Already Deliver
Wargame results do reach Congress, and when they do, they shape legislation. When Rep. Mike Gallagher convened a Taiwan tabletop exercise for the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party in April 2023, the game’s findings were translated into defense authorization language within weeks. This meant multiyear purchasing authority for long-range anti-ship missiles, accelerated arms transfers to Taiwan, and expanded munitions production. The distance from game table to statutory text was weeks.
Read more here: https://warontherocks.com/cogs-of-war/acquisition-reform-needs-its-own-wargame/?utm_source=drip&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=WOTR%20Daily%20Newsletter:%20May%

Address

22335 Exploration Drive, Ste 1035
Lexington Park, MD
20653

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 5pm
Tuesday 8am - 5pm
Wednesday 8am - 5pm
Thursday 8am - 5pm
Friday 8am - 2pm

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Patuxent Partnership posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share