Senator Chris McDaniel

Senator Chris McDaniel The personal FB page of Senator Chris McDaniel (R-MS).
Taft, Goldwater & Reagan conservative. Art. Reading. I love my mom.

Put Mississippi values first, not join the DC club. Will defend the 2nd Amendment and civil liberties. Decrease taxes and make government small.

I am a former federal law clerk, an attorney, conservative commentator, and was lead counsel for the State of Mississippi in seeking to declare Obamacare unconstitutional. The political philosophy to which I adhere represents traditional c

onservative thought – a fusion of Judeo-Christian principles, free enterprise, limited government, fiscal responsibility, free-market policies, reduced tax rates, morality in government, strong national defense, federalism, and constitutional checks and balances. Steeped in the heritage of Western civilization, it represents a consensus of reason operating within tradition, and it recognizes its origin as the 1787 Constitutional Convention. It fights for our capacity for self-government and will never abandon the ideas of the American Revolution, refusing to confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves. The American Constitution has set down for all men to see the essentially Christian and American principle that there are certain rights held by every man which no government and no majority, however powerful, can deny. I am also a partner in a law firm and licensed to practice law in Texas and Mississippi, litigating cases throughout the United States. I'm a longsuffering Chicago Cubs fan. When I'm not watching the Cubs break my heart, I return to my old love, the Boston Red Sox (American league, remember?). I also enjoy basketball (Celtics) and Hockey (Bruins) (Blackhawks). And please don't hold this against me, but I think Roger Staubach is the greatest QB ever (go Cowboys!). I still want Tom Landry back as coach. For my hobbies, I love music (all of it). My favorite snack is Peanut M&M's. I've also never turned down a chocolate chip cookie. I read everything (even if I disagree), and I'm open to changing my mind if the argument is sound. My family. And I miss my dad. Every day.

09/07/2026

She was ninety-two years old when she went to the Magic Kingdom for the first time.

Her daughter had asked her for years if she wanted to go. “You ought to see it, Mama. Just once.” And she would smile and say maybe someday, which is a phrase young people use because they believe someday is an actual place, waiting patiently for them somewhere down the road.

But at ninety-two, she knew better. Someday had become a very small country.

So they went in October. She wore white tennis shoes and a pale blue sweater even though the Florida morning was already warm. Her hair had gone completely silver years before, and her hands were thin now, defined by veins and little brown spots that told more truth about time than any calendar ever had.

They offered her a wheelchair, but she refused it. “I want to walk in,” she said. So she did, very slowly, with her daughter next to her, close enough to catch her if she stumbled, though neither of them mentioned it. Families hurried past them. Tiny children in mouse ears pulled their parents toward the entrance. Somewhere nearby, a little boy was crying because he'd dropped his ice cream. A young mother was laughing. A father was trying to fold a stroller that seemed resolved not to be folded.

They were ordinary things, beautiful things, though most of the people living them didn't know it yet.

The old woman stepped beneath the entrance and stopped. There was music playing somewhere, cheerful and distant, and the morning had a faint scent of popcorn, chocolate chip cookies, and warm pavement. She looked ahead toward Main Street, with its bright windows, flags, and painted signs, and something in the light brought back a dirt road in Mississippi in 1941.

And there she was. Seven years old again, barefoot and running. The road was hot and pale under her feet. Pine trees rose up black against an evening sky. Somewhere a dog barked, and somewhere a screen door slammed. Her mother was calling her home before dark.

She could see that old house again, though it had been gone for half a century. A little frame place with a porch across the front and windows left open in summer because nobody she knew had air-conditioning. There was a swing that moaned when the wind moved it, and a wash tub turned upside down beside the steps.

For one impossible second she smelled supper cooking in that kitchen. Cornbread. Butter beans. Grease popping in an iron skillet. Maybe biscuits if it was Sunday. She could hear plates being set on a table and her father's voice from somewhere in the back of the house. Her father was still alive. Her mother was young. And beautiful. The house was full, and the world hadn't taken anything from her yet.

She blinked, and a child ran past. Then the years began coming, not slowly as they had when she lived them, but fast. Terribly fast.

She saw herself at sixteen, standing before a mirror in a bedroom with flowered wallpaper, turning side to side in a dress her mother had altered by hand because there wasn't money for another one. It was summer, and the window was open, and the heavy night air was filled with the scent of honeysuckle and cut grass.

She remembered worrying that no boy would ask her to dance. One did, thankfully. He was nervous, and so was she. There was a school gym somewhere, hot and crowded, with paper decorations hanging from the walls and a band that probably wasn't very good, though memory had made it wonderful. She remembered his hand trembling softly against hers. She'd forgotten that. Funny what waits inside us.

Then she was twenty-one, and there was a young man standing outside a little church in a suit that didn't quite fit him, grinning as though he'd somehow fooled the whole world into giving him the prettiest girl in town. Her husband, gone thirty years now.

She remembered white flowers at the church, women fanning themselves with funeral-home fans, men loosening their ties before they reached the parking lot. It was hot that day. There'd been cake afterward and too much sweet tea and somebody's aunt crying harder than seemed necessary.

Then came their first little house. Nothing much. The roof leaked over the back bedroom, and they put a pot under it when it rained. The floor sloped a little in the kitchen. The refrigerator made a strange clicking noise at night. In winter, they stuffed towels along the bottom of the doors to keep out the cold. They had almost no money, and she'd never been happier.

After that came the babies. Lord, the babies. She remembered the heaviness of her daughter sleeping against her chest, the soft hair damp after a bath, the smell of baby powder, the tiny fingers wrapped around one of hers. She remembered pacing the hallway at two in the morning in an old robe, exhausted beyond words, praying the child would finally go to sleep.

What she wouldn't have given now for one more night like that. One more crying baby. One more bottle warming on the stove. One more little fever to worry over. One more chance to stand barefoot in a dark hallway while somebody small called for Mama.

And she kept walking through the Florida breeze. Her daughter said something next to her, but the old woman didn't hear. She was watching Christmas mornings now. Bicycles beside a tree. Stockings hanging from a mantel. Her husband on the floor trying to assemble a toy without reading the instructions because men in those days weren't about to admit they needed them. There were children running through the house in pajamas, wrapping paper everywhere, a bowl of nuts on the coffee table, coffee growing cool beside somebody's chair, and a black and white television softly humming in the corner.

She remembered one Christmas afternoon when everybody had finally gone outside and the house fell quiet. She'd stood close to the sink washing dishes and looked through the window at her husband throwing a football with the children in the yard. She hadn't thought anything special about it then.

That was the ache of it. Don’t you see? The best moments almost never announce themselves. They don't say, Remember this. This is the good part. They come disguised as Tuesday afternoons, dirty dishes, tired children, unpaid bills, groceries to put away, a husband asleep in his chair.

Then they're gone.

She remembered thinking there'd always be another Christmas like that. But there wasn't. There never is.

Then came graduations, weddings, grandchildren, baptisms, school plays, baseball games in folding chairs, long drives home at night, hospital rooms and funerals. Her father's coffin. Her mother's hands folded across her dress. She remembered the day they carried her husband out of the church while she sat in the front pew staring at a wedding ring she suddenly didn't know what to do with.

Fifty-eight years together, gone through the church doors in a wooden box.

Afterward, people delivered casseroles. Southern people always bring food to grief because there are times when nothing can be fixed, and supper is the only kindness anybody knows how to offer. For three days the refrigerator was full. Then everybody went home, and that was when the stillness came. Oh, that horrible silence.

She remembered walking into the bedroom that first evening and seeing his shoes beside the bed. That nearly broke her. Not the funeral. Not the cemetery. Not the preacher's words. The shoes. A pair of old brown shoes with one lace half undone, sitting where he'd left them because he'd expected to come back.

For months she left them there.

Then the years came faster. Great-grandchildren. Birthdays with too many candles. Doctors speaking more slowly. People began speaking loudly to her, even though she could hear perfectly well. Friends disappeared one by one from the Christmas card list. Names began appearing in the obituary section that once belonged to girls she'd whispered with in church and laughed with until midnight.

She went to funerals where fewer and fewer people knew the stories. It hurt, making the days seem hopeless. That was the part of growing old nobody had warned her about. It wasn't only losing people. It was losing the people who remembered the same things, who remembered how your father laughed, who remembered that old store on the corner, who remembered the summer it didn't rain, who remembered you before you became whoever the world decided you were.

One morning she looked into a mirror and saw an old woman looking back. She hadn't seen her arrive.

That was the strangest thing about age. You waited your whole childhood to become grown, and then one day you discovered that while you were cooking supper and paying bills and driving children to school and burying your parents and loving people as best you knew how, your own life had been quietly slipping past. Steadily, like a river moving south.

And now she was ninety-two years old, walking slowly down Main Street, U.S.A., while young families moved quickly past her toward a future they assumed was endless.

She wanted to stop them. She wanted to tell the young mother carrying the sleeping little girl not to complain about how heavy she was. Carry her. Carry her as long as she'll let you. She wanted to tell the father holding the little boy's hand to put his telephone away. Look at him. Really look at him. That little hand won't fit inside yours very long.

She wanted to tell the weary mother arguing with a teenager that she'd miss even this someday. She wanted to tell the young couple snapping at each other over where to eat that there would come a day when one empty chair at the table would make every foolish argument seem precious.

She wanted to tell all of them not to rush through it. Don't rush the bedtime stories. Don't rush the long car rides. Don't rush Christmas morning. Don't rush through supper because the dishes need washing. Don't wish away the noise.

One day the house will be clean. One day it'll be quiet. And you may find you'd trade almost anything for the mess.

She wanted to tell every tired parent in the park that someday they'd give almost anything to hear one more slammed bedroom door, one more argument from the back seat, and one more voice from upstairs asking where their shoes were. But she said nothing, because nobody would've believed her. She wouldn't have believed it either.

At twenty-seven, ninety-two isn't merely old. It's mythology.

Then they reached the end of Main Street, and her daughter touched her arm. “Mama.”

The old woman looked up, and there it was.

The castle.

Blue spires rising into the Florida sky, sunlight grasping the gold. It was brighter than she'd imagined, taller somehow, almost foolishly beautiful against that perfect morning. All around her, children shouted and pointed. Parents raised cameras. A little girl in a princess dress pranced in circles while her mother laughed.

But the old woman simply stood there.

For ninety-two years she'd never seen it. She'd seen war. She'd seen boys from her hometown leave and some of them not come back. She'd watched black-and-white televisions become color and telephones lose their cords. She'd seen men walk on the moon and presidents come and go.

She'd known summer nights before air-conditioning, country roads before interstates, Sunday dinners that lasted all afternoon, front porches where people sat because there wasn't anything else to do and, as it turned out, there didn't need to be. She'd held newborn babies and dying hands. She'd loved one man for most of a lifetime. She'd buried almost everyone who had known her as a little girl.

And now, near the far edge of her life, she was seeing a fairy-tale castle for the first time.

Her daughter watched her. “Well?”

The old woman beamed, and then tears filled her eyes. Not because the castle was beautiful, though it was. She cried because for just a few seconds, walking toward it, everybody had come back.

Her mother had been in the kitchen again. Her father had been calling from the porch. Her husband had been young and nervous outside the church. Her babies had been babies. The house had been full. The telephone hadn't rung with bad news. The doctors hadn't said anything in hushed voices. Nobody had driven away for the last time.

Nothing had happened yet. Nobody had left.

She lifted one quivering hand and wiped her cheek. “My goodness,” she uttered softly.

Her daughter thought she meant the castle.

She didn't.

She stood there a little longer. Then her daughter took her hand, the same hand the old woman once had held when her daughter was a little girl crossing a street. Only now the daughter was holding hers.

For a moment, neither of them moved.

There was no reason to hurry anymore.

09/06/2026

I’ve been thinking lately about the condition of the country, and about something we don’t seem very comfortable discussing anymore.

America is becoming less Christian. At the same time, we seem to be becoming angrier, lonelier, more vulgar, more violent, more suspicious of one another, and less restrained in the way we behave. I don’t believe those things are entirely unrelated.

Before anybody starts polishing a stone to throw at me, I should make something clear. I’m not writing this from some position of spiritual superiority. Far from it. I’m not the person I ought to be.

I’ve made mistakes. My share. Plenty of them. There have been Sundays when I should’ve been in church and wasn’t; prayers I should’ve prayed and didn’t. And people I should’ve forgiven sooner.

So this isn’t a column about judging anybody. I’ll leave that to the “perfect” among us.

It’s about accepting what Christianity has done, often silently, for millions of people and for the civilization we inherited.

Christianity teaches a man that he isn’t the center of the universe. That’s a fairly revolutionary idea these days. It tells us there’s something above appetite, something above anger, something above politics, and something above our own desires.

It tells the powerful they’re accountable and the weak they have dignity. It tells the angry to forgive and the proud to humble themselves. It tells us to remember the poor, love our friends, keep our promises, control our appetites, and remember that we owe something to our neighbors.

It doesn’t always work. Human beings remain human beings. But that doesn’t make the teaching meaningless. If anything, the fact that we fail so often to live up to it is evidence of how badly we need it.

Civilization has always required restraint. Every human heart contains generosity and selfishness, tenderness and cruelty, patience and rage. Civilization depends upon cultivating one and restraining the other.

Christianity has spent two thousand years telling us to do exactly that. It civilizes the inner savage in all of us.

That phrase may offend modern ears, but I mean it. You can’t build a peaceful civilization on the idea that every desire deserves fulfillment, every grievance deserves vengeance, every appetite deserves satisfaction, and every person should answer only to himself.

Something has to tell us no. Something has to remind us that freedom without responsibility eventually turns into chaos.

For generations in America, Christianity helped do that.

And down here, especially, the church was never merely a building where people sat for an hour on Sunday morning. The little country church buried the dead. It fed families whose houses burned. It carried casseroles to widows. It passed the plate for a child who needed surgery or for a family whose father had lost his job.

When a storm came through, the church opened its doors. When somebody died, the women in the congregation somehow knew how many hams, pound cakes, and bowls of potato salad would be needed before the family itself had figured out who was coming.

Do you remember?

The church gave the old folks somewhere they still matter. And it gave young people somewhere adults knew their names, knew their parents, and sometimes knew enough of their business to keep them out of trouble.

It gave a community rhythm. Sunday morning and Wednesday night. Christmas hymns and Easter lilies. Vacation Bible School in the heat of June. Fried chicken after homecoming. Weddings beneath stained glass. Funerals where men took off their hats underneath the oak trees, and somebody stood ahead of a grieving family and said that death wasn’t the end of the story.

Those things mattered. They still do.

There was something stabilizing about living in a town where, whatever else divided people, thousands gathered each week to hear the same old commands. Love your neighbor. Forgive your enemies. Care for the widow and orphan. Tell the truth. Keep your promises. Control yourself. Remember that one day you’ll answer for the life you lived.

You don’t have to be a theologian to understand the value of that.

But somewhere along the way, much of fashionable culture decided Christianity wasn’t merely unnecessary. It became something to laugh at.

The believer became unsophisticated. The church became backward. Traditional morality became repression. Restraint became judgment. Sin became an embarrassing word from an embarrassing past.

We were told we were becoming liberated. But maybe we ought to ask ourselves what, exactly, we were being liberated from.

Because when you tear down an old moral structure, something eventually moves into the empty space. And what has moved in doesn’t look much like liberation.

People are lonely. Families are hurting. Communities are fractured. Children spend enormous parts of childhood staring at illuminated screens. Politics has become a substitute religion, complete with saints, devils, heretics, and excommunications. Public disagreement becomes personal hatred almost instantly. The language gets uglier, and the tempers get shorter.

We have more ways to communicate than any people who ever lived, and we seem less capable of understanding one another. We have more comforts and less peace, more entertainment and less joy.

None of that means every Christian is virtuous or every unbeliever is wicked. Of course not. I’ve known atheists of tremendous kindness and Christians who weren’t.

But we shouldn’t make life so complicated that we become afraid to recognize the obvious. Ideas matter. Culture matters. Institutions matter.

Christianity taught generations of people that the fellow standing across from you wasn’t merely an obstacle, an enemy, a demographic group, or a political opponent. He was your neighbor. She was a child of God.

That changes the way you look at people.

And when enough people stop believing anything is sacred, we probably shouldn’t be surprised when they eventually start treating everything as disposable. Family. Community. Decency. Even one another.

Maybe the answer to our disorder isn’t another government program or another politician promising to save us. Maybe some of what we’re looking for has been sitting quietly in those old churches all along.

A little humility. A little forgiveness. A little self-restraint. A recognition that we owe something to people besides ourselves.

I can still picture those little churches along Mississippi highways and at the ends of country roads. White paint faded by the summers. Cemetery monuments beneath the pines. A fellowship hall out back. A steeple rising just high enough above the trees to catch your eye from the road.

For generations, their bells told whole communities that Sunday morning had arrived. A beautiful tradition, the sound carried across pastures and courthouse squares, through neighborhoods and open windows, calling farmers and lawyers, teachers and mechanics, saints and sinners toward something higher than themselves.

Nobody walking through those doors was perfect. The preacher wasn’t perfect, and the people in the pews certainly weren’t. But every Sunday they were reminded that they ought to try.

Try to be kinder. Try to forgive a little quicker. Try to master anger before anger mastered them. Try to keep a promise. Try to help somebody who couldn’t do a thing for them in return.

The church bells didn’t make us flawless. Nothing ever will. But perhaps they made us a little gentler, a little more grateful, a little more ashamed of cruelty, and a little slower to surrender to every appetite and every anger.

A little less savage.

And as those bells grow quieter across America, we should at least have the courage to ask what else may be growing quiet with them.

09/05/2026

Congresswoman Nancy Mace weighed in on the Lindsay Clancy case:

“If postpartum mental illness becomes a get-out-of-jail-free card for murdering your children, then by logic, anyone diagnosed with it should lose custody of their kids.”

It’s a provocative argument. If a mental condition can be severe enough to relieve someone of criminal responsibility after three children are killed, should that same condition require protective intervention before tragedy strikes?

What are your thoughts?

09/05/2026

How long can a people defend every culture but their own, excuse every intolerance but the one found at home, and pretend that those who despise their freedoms are natural allies?

Far too often, there are nights in America when a familiar place becomes a place of mourning. A parking lot outside a neighborhood bar. Colored candles trembling in the darkness. Flowers leaning against a wall. Photographs of men who expected to go home but never did.

That’s what remains outside the Venture-N in Tucson, Arizona, where Vincent Anthony Siqueiros and Cameron Davis Capara were shot and killed. Police say the gunman, Ousman Ceesay, didn’t know them. He confronted them in the parking lot, murdered them, and then killed himself. Investigators found a note saying the attack was motivated by hatred of the LGBTQ community. They also found a list of other LGBTQ-associated businesses. This wasn’t a quarrel that turned deadly. It was a hunt.

We ought to begin there, with the victims. Two men were alive when the evening began, with people who loved them and mornings they expected to see. By sunrise, they were gone. Their deaths shouldn’t be reduced to a prop in somebody else’s political argument.

But tragedy sometimes illuminates contradictions that polite society would rather leave in the dark. This one ought to force an honest conversation about a peculiar alliance that has taken hold on the Western left: the alliance between LGBTQ activists and radical movements rooted in cultures that reject nearly everything those activists believe.

Police have established that Ceesay targeted gay men. They haven’t publicly established that Hamas, Palestinian politics, or any particular religious organization directed or inspired his crime. We shouldn’t claim more than the evidence proves. There’s already enough truth here without decorating it.

The larger contradiction, however, is undeniable.

For years, we’ve watched activists march beneath rainbow flags while chanting slogans in support of Palestinian movements. We’ve seen “Queers for Palestine” signs carried through American streets with all the earnest confidence of people who’ve never paused to wonder what would happen if they carried the same signs through Gaza.

There won’t be a pride parade in Gaza. There won’t be rainbow banners hanging from government buildings. There won’t be same-sex weddings celebrated under the approving gaze of Hamas. Same-sex relations are illegal there and may be punished by years in prison. In the West Bank, the law is different, but social hostility remains a serious danger. The Palestinian territories aren’t a single legal jurisdiction, and honesty requires saying so. Honesty also requires admitting that neither territory resembles the tolerant society Western LGBTQ activists demand at home.

Yet the alliance persists.

It persists because much of modern progressivism no longer judges movements by what they believe. It judges them by where they’ve been placed on an ideological seating chart. Once a group is labeled “oppressed,” its actual beliefs become almost irrelevant. Its cruelty is explained away. Its intolerance is treated as a cultural misunderstanding. Its victims disappear behind a cloud of fashionable slogans.

The categories have already been assigned. Israel is powerful, Western, prosperous, and therefore guilty. Palestinians are weaker, non-Western, and therefore virtuous. Once those roles are distributed, no inconvenient fact is permitted to interrupt the play.

That’s how people who demand absolute affirmation in Mississippi or Arizona find themselves marching in support of political and religious movements that wouldn’t grant them the elementary freedom to live openly. They condemn a Christian baker for declining to decorate a wedding cake, then romanticize societies in which homosexuality may invite imprisonment, family violence, or worse. They can detect oppression in a pronoun from fifty yards away, but somehow miss it when it’s written into law.

There’s a difference between caring about Palestinian civilians and endorsing the worldview of Hamas. Innocent people don’t forfeit their humanity because their rulers are cruel. Children caught in war deserve mercy no matter which flag flies over the rubble. Hunger isn’t a political theory, and grief doesn’t have a nationality.

But humanitarian concern doesn’t require moral blindness. You can mourn innocent Palestinians without pretending Hamas shares Western values. You can oppose needless suffering without chanting slogans you haven’t bothered to understand. You can recognize the dignity of every human being while also recognizing that some cultures and political movements are more protective of human dignity than others.

That last truth has become almost unspeakable in the West. We’ve been taught that every culture is equally valid, except our own, which must remain forever in the prisoner’s dock. Western civilization is expected to apologize for every old scar while importing ideologies that create fresh ones. The society that produced constitutional liberty, religious tolerance, women’s equality, and legal protection for homosexuals is treated as uniquely wicked by people who enjoy every one of its protections.

Put simply, they curse the house while sleeping safely beneath its roof.

The Tucson killings expose the danger of refusing to make distinctions. Hatred of gay people doesn’t become less hateful when it comes from someone progressives regard as belonging to another marginalized group. Murder doesn’t become culturally complicated because the murderer doesn’t fit the preferred political profile. A dead man is no less dead because acknowledging the source of the hatred might make a coalition uncomfortable.

There’s a lesson here larger than any single election or movement. A civilization that no longer believes in its own principles will eventually lose the will to defend them. Rights survive only when people understand where those rights came from, why they matter, and what ideas threaten them. Tolerance cannot endure if it’s expected to tolerate doctrines committed to its destruction.

The rainbow flag and the banner of Islamic fundamentalism don’t represent complementary visions of human freedom. They represent opposing ones. One insists that sexual identity must be publicly affirmed. The other may regard homosexual conduct as criminal and sinful. No clever slogan can reconcile them. No university seminar can wish away the conflict.

The people carrying both banners may believe they’re standing with the oppressed. In reality, they’re often standing inside a political contradiction so vast that only fashion could keep it from collapsing.

Vincent Siqueiros and Cameron Capara deserved to leave that Tucson parking lot alive. Their murders should be condemned without qualification, no matter who committed them and no matter which political narrative is inconvenienced.

Candles will eventually burn down. The flowers outside the Venture-N will fade. But the question left behind shouldn’t disappear with them.

How long can a people defend every culture but their own, excuse every intolerance but the one found at home, and pretend that those who despise their freedoms are natural allies?

Sooner or later, reality presents its bill. In Tucson, it came due in blood.

09/04/2026

People have been asking me how I feel about the Lindsay Clancy case.

I haven’t been sitting in that courtroom, and I haven’t reviewed every exhibit or heard every word of testimony presented to the jury. Like everyone watching from a distance, I’m necessarily relying upon the evidence as it has been publicly reported and as I presently understand it. The final judgment belongs to the jurors who have heard the entire case and received the court’s instructions on the law.

I also recognize that postpartum mental illness is real, serious, and sometimes devastating. Lindsay Clancy may have been suffering terribly, and the mental-health system may have failed her. But neither proposition answers the ultimate legal question: whether she remained criminally responsible for killing her three children.

Some cases are difficult because the evidence is uncertain. Others are difficult because the truth, even when we can see it, is almost too painful to hold. This case asks us to look upon a mother’s suffering without looking away from the children who died. We ought to be capable of both. We can have compassion for a broken mind and still insist that three lost lives matter.

Based upon the evidence as I presently understand it, if I were prosecuting this case, this is what I would say in closing:

Ladies and gentlemen, there was a time, not very long ago, when three children lived in a house in Duxbury.

There were toys on the floor and little shoes by the door. There were birthday candles, trips to the doctor, afternoons in the snow, and the thousand small commotions that make a family home feel alive. Cora was five years old. Dawson was three. Callan was eight months old, still new enough to the world that nearly everything before him was waiting to be seen for the first time.

There would have been cups left on tables, blankets carried from room to room, fingerprints on windows, and the sound of small feet moving down the hallway. There would have been bedtime stories, misplaced mittens, cartoons playing in the morning, and children calling for their mother in the night. Nothing remarkable to the rest of the world, perhaps, but everything that makes a life.

That house is quiet now.

The defense has asked you to look deeply into the mind of Lindsay Clancy. You should. The law requires it. She was suffering. She was depressed. She was frightened. She needed help, and there is reason to believe the system charged with helping her failed in serious ways.

But mental illness and criminal responsibility aren’t opposites. A person may suffer from mental illness and still understand that murder is wrong. A person may be anxious, depressed, medicated, and desperate, yet retain the capacity to obey the law. The question isn’t whether Lindsay Clancy was sick. The question is whether her illness took away her substantial capacity to understand the wrongfulness of killing her children or to stop herself from doing it.

The evidence tells you that it did not.

On the day of the killings, she moved through the ordinary business of family life. She took the children to an appointment. She played with them in the snow. She communicated with other people. Those who spoke with her didn’t hear a woman disconnected from reality. Her treating clinicians had seen anxiety, depression, insomnia, and suicidal thoughts. They hadn’t observed psychosis. They hadn’t seen her responding to voices or living in a world that existed only inside her mind.

Then, that evening, she waited until her husband was gone.

Patrick Clancy didn’t simply wander away. Lindsay sent him out to obtain medicine and pick up dinner. She knew where he was going. She knew he would be gone. She knew the children would be alone with her.

That was opportunity created by choice.

While he was away, she took exercise bands and wrapped them around the necks of her children. Not strangers. Not shadows in a hallucination. Her children. Cora, Dawson, and Callan.

Each child required a separate act. Each small life required time to extinguish. There were three opportunities to stop. Three opportunities to loosen the bands. Three opportunities to call Patrick, dial 911, run next door, or simply walk away.

She did none of those things.

The defense tells you about a voice she later said she heard. But that account must be judged like every other piece of evidence. It came after the killings. It wasn’t observed by the doctors who treated her before that night. It must be weighed against her conduct: her planning, her timing, her ordinary conversations, and the terrible sequence of deliberate acts inside that home.

The law doesn’t ask whether a defendant felt compelled. Human beings feel driven by anger, despair, fear, jealousy, addiction, and hopelessness every day. The law asks whether mental disease deprived her of substantial capacity. It doesn’t excuse a deliberate killing merely because the person who committed it was suffering.

And make no mistake: Lindsay Clancy knew that what she had done was wrong.

Her actions afterward weren’t the actions of a woman who believed she had performed some innocent or lawful act. She cut herself. She jumped from the window. She tried to leave the world in which judgment would come. Her su***de attempt was tragic, but it doesn’t erase the choices that preceded it. It demonstrates that she understood the awful finality of what had happened inside that house.

You may feel compassion for her. There is nothing wrong with that. Mercy is among the finest instincts God placed in the human heart. But compassion can become careless when it causes the victims to vanish.

Much of the public discussion now centers upon Lindsay, her illness, her medications, her injuries, her treatment, and her future. Those are legitimate subjects. Yet Cora, Dawson, and Callan weren’t supporting characters in their mother’s tragedy. They were the victims of it.

They had names. They had voices. They had Christmas mornings still ahead of them, school pictures that would never be taken, scraped knees that would never need kissing, and ordinary summer afternoons they would never know. Callan had barely entered the world before it was taken from him. No discussion of mercy should require us to turn our eyes away from them.

In the South, we understand something about memory. We keep photographs in old albums and Bibles. We remember who sat in which chair at the supper table. We remember pencil marks on a doorframe showing how tall the children had grown. We save birthday cards in dresser drawers and tiny handprints pressed into clay. We can still hear the screen door closing at a house that was torn down thirty years ago. We remember the voices of people we loved long after the world has gone quiet around them.

That kind of memory matters here. But memory, however tenderly kept, is a poor substitute for the life that should have been lived.

Cora should have learned to ride a bicycle. Dawson should have carried a lunch box into school. Callan should have taken his first uncertain steps across a kitchen floor while someone reached out to catch him. There should have been baseball games and Christmas pageants, report cards on refrigerators, fireflies in June, and sleepy rides home beneath a summer moon.

There should have been loose teeth placed beneath pillows, candles added to birthday cakes, and new shoes bought at the beginning of each school year. Their father should have watched them grow taller. Their grandparents should have watched their faces change. Someday, those children should have looked through old photographs and laughed at how young everyone once had been.

All of it was waiting for them.

And all of it was taken.

The defense may say those losses are too emotional to help you decide this case. But the law has never required jurors to become less human. It requires you to govern your emotions with reason. It requires you to consider the evidence, apply the law, and return a truthful verdict. The lives of these children are part of that truth.

You aren’t being asked to decide whether Lindsay Clancy deserved better psychiatric care. She may well have deserved it. You aren’t being asked whether postpartum illness is real. It is. You aren’t being asked whether she was a loving mother before that night. The evidence suggests that she was.

You are being asked whether, on January 24, 2023, she understood that killing Cora, Dawson, and Callan was wrong and possessed the substantial capacity to stop herself.

The evidence proves that she did.

She created the opportunity. She waited until Patrick was away. She acted deliberately. She made a separate decision against each child. And when it was over, she understood that something so terrible had occurred that she attempted to take her own life.

This case isn’t about punishing mental illness. It is about refusing to let mental illness become an incantation that makes responsibility disappear. If sorrow alone excused murder, the law would have no place left to stand. If a diagnosis erased every deliberate choice made by a suffering person, then the lives taken by those choices would receive no justice at all.

Ladies and gentlemen, when you retire to deliberate, the courtroom will grow still. The lawyers will stop talking. The witnesses will be gone. The experts and their diagnoses will remain behind in stacks of paper.

But three children will go into that jury room with you.

Cora. Dawson. Callan.

Remember them as they were before this case reduced them to exhibits and autopsy photographs. Remember the house when it still held laughter. Remember the birthdays that should have come, the school bells they should have heard, and the long lives that should have stretched before them.

Someday, this trial will end. The courtroom doors will close, the reporters will leave, and the public will turn its attention to something else. But there will still be three empty places in one family. There will still be photographs that never grow older. There will still be a house in Duxbury where three childhoods ended on a winter evening.

Then return the only verdict that speaks the whole truth.

Lindsay Clancy was mentally ill. She was also criminally responsible.

Find her guilty.

Address

Ellisville, MS

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Senator Chris McDaniel posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Organization

Send a message to Senator Chris McDaniel:

Shortcuts

Share