06/10/2026
CFR INVESTIGATES: THE DEVON HORTON KICKBACK CASE
FROM SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT TO FEDERAL DEFENDANT
A former Illinois school superintendent has admitted that the job he held overseeing a public school district became part of a federal criminal case involving contracts, undisclosed financial interests and kickbacks.
On October 5, 2026, former Evanston/Skokie School District 65 Superintendent Devon Horton changed his plea to guilty in federal court, bringing a major development in a case that has been unfolding since federal prosecutors announced charges against Horton and three other defendants.
Horton had originally pleaded not guilty to the charges.
Now he has admitted guilt to three federal counts.
And the case provides a window into how public-school contracting can become vulnerable when the people responsible for approving public expenditures have undisclosed financial relationships with vendors.
HOW THE SCHEME ALLEGEDLY WORKED
According to federal prosecutors, Horton used his position as superintendent of District 65 to steer professional-services contracts toward companies connected to people he knew.
The contracts were worth more than $280,000.
Prosecutors alleged that Horton received more than $80,000 in kickbacks connected to those contracts.
The issue wasn’t simply who received the contracts.
Federal prosecutors alleged that Horton concealed his financial interests from the District 65 Board of Education while participating in the contracting process.
That meant the school board was allegedly making decisions without being given the complete financial picture.
Horton has now admitted wrongdoing related to the scheme.
PUBLIC MONEY. PRIVATE BENEFIT.
The allegations went beyond contracting.
Horton admitted improperly using a District 65 procurement card for personal expenses.
He also admitted failing to report income connected to the scheme on his federal tax returns.
What began as questions surrounding school contracts ultimately became a federal investigation involving allegations of fraud, embezzlement and tax violations.
The investigation brought together federal law-enforcement agencies, including the FBI, the U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General and the IRS, along with the Chicago Board of Education Office of Inspector General.
THEN THE CASE REACHED CHICAGO
There is another chapter to this story.
The federal investigation also involved people connected to Chicago Public Schools.
Two of Horton’s co-defendants were CPS employees at the time of the indictment:
Antonio Ross, who was identified as the principal of Hyde Park Academy, and Alfonzo Lewis, identified as the school’s athletic director.
Federal prosecutors also alleged that a company connected to Horton received approximately $10,000 from Chicago Public Schools for professional services.
Prosecutors alleged that false purchase orders and invoices were used for services that had not actually been performed.
That allegation is separate from Horton’s guilty plea, and the legal status of the other defendants must be distinguished from Horton’s admission of guilt.
But the CPS connection makes this case particularly important for Chicago taxpayers.
Because we’re no longer talking only about what happened inside one suburban school district.
We’re talking about a contracting relationship that federal prosecutors say touched Chicago’s public-school system as well.
THE PEOPLE WHO TRUSTED THE SYSTEM
Parents send their children to school expecting educators to educate.
Taxpayers provide the money expecting school officials to use it for students and legitimate district operations.
School boards establish procurement rules because public officials aren’t supposed to use their positions to enrich themselves or people connected to them.
That’s why conflicts of interest matter.
That’s why invoices matter.
That’s why purchase orders matter.
And that’s why independent oversight matters.
When those safeguards fail, the question isn’t merely how much money was involved.
It’s how the system allowed it to happen.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
Horton’s guilty plea doesn’t end the broader case.
Another defendant, Samuel Ross, pleaded guilty September 29, 2026, and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors, according to reporting on the case.
Other defendants remain in the legal process.
Horton’s sentencing is scheduled for January 5, 2027.
For taxpayers, however, the story is bigger than sentencing.
The real issue is whether school districts have adequate controls to prevent contracts from becoming vehicles for undisclosed financial relationships.
Because the money being spent isn’t the superintendent’s money.
It isn’t the school board’s money.
It’s the public’s money.
And when that money moves through contracts, purchase orders and invoices, taxpayers should be able to follow the trail from beginning to end.
CFR INVESTIGATES:
WHO GOT THE CONTRACT?
WHO APPROVED IT?
WHAT DID TAXPAYERS RECEIVE?
AND WHO WAS WATCHING THE MONEY?
Flipsred.com