https://truth7wins.square.site/

Truth7, Chicago, IL (2026)

02/12/2025

The effect of rebelling against God

12/31/2024

Dive into the chilling world of Lilith, the dark feminist icon whose roots lie in Jewish folklore. This video unravels the sinister narrative surrounding Lilith, revealing her as a figure of chaos, rebellion, and destruction rather than empowerment. Explore her defiance against Adam, her troubling connections with demons, and her terrifying legacy as a feared entity that threatens family and society. Modern radical feminism's embrace of Lilith as an emblem of independence raises critical questions about the movement's path. Join us as we illuminate the dark secrets behind this complex figure and challenge the true meaning of empowerment. Like and share if you find this exploration of Lilith thought-provoking!

12/30/2024

The Feninist Icon: Lilith

In Jewish folklore, Lilith is often portrayed as a rebellious and dangerous figure, believed to be Adam’s first wife who refused to submit to him and fled the Garden of Eden. After leaving, she became associated with demons, residing near the Red Sea and birthing countless demonic offspring. Lilith is notorious for harming infants, seducing men in their sleep, and causing chaos, aligning her with night demons and unholy forces. Protective amulets inscribed with the names of angels were traditionally used to guard against her influence, particularly for newborns and pregnant women. In modern times, Lilith is viewed today as a feminist icon of independence and rebellion, and in literature as a dark archetype, symbolizing forbidden power and chaos.

12/30/2024

The Death of Chivalry and Flourishing Relationships

How did we go from the thriving marriages of the 1950s, where society was fruitful and multiplied, to a world of dissatisfaction, declining marriage rates, and men leaving to seek traditional relationships abroad?

This collapse began when society replaced God’s Divine Law with ideologies rooted in Marxism, radical feminism, and postmodernism. The Bible provides clear roles for healthy relationships:
• Husbands as leaders (Ephesians 5:23),
• Providers (1 Timothy 5:8),
• Protectors (1 Peter 3:7),
• Wives to submit while husbands to love sacrificially (Ephesians 5:22-25).

Radical feminism, emerging in the 1960s, rejected these roles, seeing them as oppressive tools of a patriarchal system. As Shulamith Firestone argued, “The division of labor by s*x became entrenched not as a biological necessity, but as a tool for maintaining male power and privilege over women.”

Men as Protectors

Feminism redefined men’s protective role as oppressive and harmful:
• Bell Hooks: “The notion that women need to be rescued perpetuates the myth of male heroism and female dependency.”
• Susan Brownmiller: “The protector role perpetuates a myth that men safeguard women when, in fact, they are the ones women most need protection from.”
• Andrea Dworkin: “We don’t need protection from men. We need protection from the systems they built to keep us dependent on them.”

This rejection undermined the natural and sacrificial duty of men to safeguard their families.

Men as Providers

The provider role was reframed as control:
• Shulamith Firestone: “The male is not just the provider but the keeper of women’s oppression.”

Rather than valuing men’s contributions, feminism painted this role as inherently exploitative.

Men as Leaders, Women Submissive

Biblical leadership and submission, designed for unity, were criticized as forms of slavery:
• Simone de Beauvoir: “Her wings are cut, and then she is blamed for not knowing how to fly.”
• Simone de Beauvoir: “This is what the patriarchal male has done for women: he has made her a slave under the pretense of protecting her.”

The Attack on the Patriarchy

Feminists declared war on traditional relationships as a whole:
• Shulamith Firestone: “The division of labor by s*x became entrenched… as a tool for maintaining male power and privilege.”
• Andrea Dworkin: “We are not free until we refuse to be used by the power structures that oppress us.”

By dismantling these structures, feminism created division rather than liberation.

The Fallout

This rejection of traditional roles has led to:
• Declining marriage rates,
• Rising divorce,
• Falling fertility,
• Dissatisfaction in relationships.

As men increasingly feel vilified, many are seeking traditional partnerships abroad, giving rise to movements like the “passport bros.” The phrase “Chivalry is dead, and women killed it” encapsulates this decline.

Conclusion

The Bible’s design for relationships—men as leaders, providers, and protectors, and women as supportive partners—once fostered thriving marriages and stable societies. By rejecting these roles, modern feminism has fractured relationships and left society in decline. To restore harmony, we must return to these divine principles that create love, respect, and flourishing relationships.

12/30/2024

Modern Feminism: The Trojan Horse of Marxism

12/30/2024

Modern Feminism emerged in 1960s and started taking effect 1970. Look at its effects on marriage, divorce rates, and childlessness along with projections on fertility rate trends for Generation Z and Generation Alpha:

U.S Census Data for the 1950s, 1970s, 2000s, and 2020s

1950s:

• Marriage Percentage: Approximately 68% of adults aged 18 and over were married in 1950.
• Divorce Percentage: About 2% of adults aged 18 and over were divorced in 1950.
• Childlessness: Data on childlessness for this period is limited; however, societal norms favored larger families, suggesting lower childlessness rates.
1970s:
• Marriage Percentage: In 1970, around 70% of adults aged 18 and over were married.
• Divorce Percentage: Approximately 3% of adults aged 18 and over were divorced in 1970.
• Childlessness: By the late 1970s, about 10% of women aged 40-44 were childless.
2000s:
• Marriage Percentage: In 2000, about 57% of adults aged 18 and over were married.
• Divorce Percentage: Approximately 10% of adults aged 18 and over were divorced in 2000.
• Childlessness: In 2000, around 18% of women aged 40-44 were childless.
2020s:
• Marriage Percentage: By 2020, about 50% of adults aged 18 and over were married.
• Divorce Percentage: Approximately 11% of adults aged 18 and over were divorced in 2020.
• Childlessness: In 2022, 19.6% of women aged 40-44 were childless.
Fertility Rate Trends and Projections:
• Current Fertility Rate: The total fertility rate (TFR) in the United States was 1,665.0 births per 1,000 women in 2022, below the replacement level of 2.1.

Generation Z and Generation Alpha Projections: Current trends suggest a continuation of delayed childbirth, decline in marriages, and smaller family sizes.

12/29/2024

The Vote Was Earned by Suffragists—Stop Giving Credit to Feminism

Modern feminism claims credit for women gaining the right to vote in 1920, but this achievement belongs to the women’s suffrage movement, not feminism. Suffragists avoided the term “feminist,” but in 1968, journalist Martha Lear retroactively labeled their work as “first-wave feminism,” giving undue credit to feminism. Modern feminism, including radical and liberal feminism, didn’t emerge until the 1960s. If you support the 1920 suffrage victory, you’re a suffragist, not a modern feminist.

12/29/2024

Modern feminism is Marxism applied to gender relations. Modern feminism (1960s onwards) views marriage through a Marxist lens, framing it as a system of power and oppression where men are the bourgeoisie (the ruling class) and women are the proletariat (the working class). Just as Marx critiqued capitalism for exploiting labor, feminists argue that traditional marriage exploits women’s unpaid labor, enforces economic dependence, and perpetuates male dominance. Radical feminists like Shulamith Firestone describe marriage as a tool of patriarchy, keeping women in subordinate roles, while liberal feminists like Betty Friedan highlight the dissatisfaction and economic limitations imposed on women within the institution. Feminism, like Marxism, seeks to dismantle such structures to achieve liberation and equality.

12/29/2024

Modern Feminism is Marxism Applied to Gender Relations

Modern feminism, specifically liberal feminism and radical feminism (1960s–70s), applies Marxist ideas to gender relations. This article is not about earlier movements like women’s suffrage, which had entirely different goals.

Marxist Framework

Marxism critiques the exploitation of labor and systemic power imbalances:

• Economic Power in Relationships:
“The capitalist system is one which is based on the exploitation of labor.”
Source: Capital by Karl Marx.

• Class Struggles in Marriage:
“The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.”
Source: The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.

• Marriage as a Capitalist Institution:
“The family is… a capitalist institution” and “the first class opposition… was that between man and woman.”
Source: The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State by Friedrich Engels.

Feminists adapted this framework, equating men to the bourgeoisie (owners) and women to the proletariat (laborers), with marriage as an institution of systemic oppression.

Radical Feminism
• Marriage and Male Dominance:
“The male is not just the provider but the keeper of women’s oppression.”
Source: The Dialectic of S*x by Shulamith Firestone.
• Marriage as Oppression:
“Marriage is a way for men to maintain control over women.”
Source: Against Our Will: Men, Women, and R**e by Susan Brownmiller.

Liberal Feminism
• Household Power Dynamics:
“In the traditional family, the husband is the head, the wife is the subordinate.”
Source: The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan.
• Economic Independence:
“The problem that has no name” refers to women’s dissatisfaction with limited roles.
Source: The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan.
• Marriage and Economic Dependence:
“The institution of marriage is the single greatest source of female poverty in the world.”
Source: In*******se by Andrea Dworkin.

Conclusion

Feminists applied Marxist critiques of class oppression to gender relations, seeing marriage as a capitalist institution where men (bourgeoisie) dominate women (proletariat). This perspective underpins critiques by radical and liberal feminists of traditional gender roles, marriage, and economic dependency.

To achieve liberation, feminists argue for dismantling patriarchal structures, including marriage as traditionally defined, in order to build systems that promote equality and autonomy for women.

12/27/2024

Awakening: The Hidden Truths Of Reality

12/27/2024

Behind the illusion: Uncovering deeper truths

12/26/2024

Beyond the Illusion: Uncovering the Deeper Truths of Reality

We often assume that facts are the foundation of truth and physical reality is the ultimate reality. But what if our physical reality is more of an illusion, a shadow of a deeper, more profound truth?

The Nature of Facts

Facts are transient, dependent on time, location, and perception. They can change from true to false based on new information or perspectives. Moreover, all facts operate within a larger system or domain, making them part of a subset of facts that only make sense in relation to this broader context. To illustrate, consider a single data point: isolated, it's meaningless, but as part of a curve, it gains significance. This curve, in turn, is a subset of a larger web of lines, demonstrating how facts are part of larger abstract systems.

The Limits of Physical Reality

Physical reality is not as concrete as we think. Our understanding of the world is filtered through our senses, which can be misleading. For instance, each person perceives colors differently, and animals do too. We only see a limited percentage of the electromagnetic spectrum, and physical properties like roughness, lightness, and heaviness are dependent on our sensory perception. Furthermore, physical realities exist within abstract domains, which serve as the backdrop for material existence.

The Primacy of Abstract Reality

Abstract realities are immutable, eternal, and transcendent. They provide the structure and meaning that make physical realities comprehensible. In contrast, physical realities are ephemeral, changing, decaying, and contingent on conditions. Consider a video game, which is contingent on its code. If the code changes, the game changes. Similarly, physical realities are contingent on the abstract domains that govern them. In essence, abstract reality is the meta-layer of reality, the underlying framework that shapes and governs our physical experience.

The Ultimate Reality: Perfect Forms and Abstract Reality

This idea is echoed in Platonism, which posits that abstract forms are the ultimate reality. According to Plato, our world is an imperfect reflection of the perfect, abstract Forms. The Bible and other sacred texts can help us explore this idea, revealing the imperfect and illusory nature of our physical reality. By studying these texts, we can gain insight into the ultimate reality that underlies our existence.

Conclusion

So, can a fictional story be more true and real than a factual event? Surprisingly, yes. Fiction can tap into eternal, abstract truths, making it more real and meaningful than fleeting, imperfect physical realities. By recognizing the limitations of physical reality and the primacy of abstract reality, we can gain a deeper understanding of the world and our place within it. We can also appreciate the value of studying sacred texts and exploring the ultimate reality that underlies our existence.

Truth7

02/12/2025

12/31/2024

12/30/2024

12/30/2024

12/30/2024

12/30/2024

12/29/2024

12/29/2024

12/29/2024

12/27/2024

12/27/2024

12/26/2024

Address

Website

Alerts

Contact The Organization

Shortcuts

Share

Category