06/08/2026
Arobo Court Victory Raises Fresh Questions Over APC Primaries, May Influence NDC Cases in Enugu – Lawyer
A constitutional lawyer, Jirgba Terfa Jirgba, Esq., has said the Federal High Court judgment affirming Abdulghani Arobo as the authentic All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate for the Owo/Ose Federal Constituency in Ondo State carries major implications for ongoing disputes over party primaries across the country.
According to him, the ruling should serve as a serious warning to some APC National Assembly members from Benue State seeking re-election after allegedly losing their party primaries but still having their names submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) by the party's national leadership.
The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, in a judgment delivered on Wednesday, August 5, declared Arobo the lawful APC candidate for the Owo/Ose Federal Constituency House of Representatives election.
Justice Peter Lifu held that Arobo validly emerged as the winner of the APC primary conducted on May 16, 2026, after polling the highest number of lawful votes cast across the constituency.
The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/26, was filed by Arobo against the APC and INEC, challenging the party's handling of the outcome of the primary election.
After reviewing the results from all 23 wards in Owo/Ose Federal Constituency, the court ruled that Arobo was the legitimate winner and directed the APC to recognise and nominate him as its candidate for the House of Representatives election.
The court further noted that Arobo secured 7,959 votes in Owo Local Government Area and 2,583 votes in Ose Local Government Area, giving him the highest valid votes in the primary election.
Justice Lifu subsequently nullified every other declaration or nomination made by the APC for the constituency, ruling that only Arobo was validly nominated. All five issues presented before the court were resolved in his favour.
The court also ordered both the APC and INEC to recognise only Arobo as the party's candidate. INEC was directed to reopen its nomination portal to immediately accept and upload his name, while both defendants were restrained from recognising or dealing with any other person as the APC candidate for the constituency.
Reacting to the judgment, Jirgba described it as a strong judicial reaffirmation that political parties cannot arbitrarily replace candidates who validly emerge from transparent primary elections.
He argued that the judgment could significantly affect similar cases currently before the courts involving APC National Assembly primaries in Benue State, where several aspirants have alleged that despite winning their primaries, their names were unlawfully substituted by the party leadership.
Some of the affected aspirants have already obtained interim court orders restraining the APC and INEC from replacing their names while they seek final declarations recognising them as the rightful winners of their respective primaries.
Jirgba maintained that the Arobo judgment further strengthens their legal position, noting that Nigerian courts have consistently protected the rights of candidates who genuinely win party primaries against unlawful substitution.
The judgment is also expected to have significant implications for claims surrounding the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) primaries in Enugu State, particularly allegations that the party's candidate for the Enugu North Senatorial District, alongside candidates in some other parts of the state, were replaced after validly emerging from their respective primaries. Political observers believe the court's position reinforces the principle that no political party has the power to arbitrarily substitute candidates who lawfully won their primaries without following due process.