28/08/2026
HOW SHOULD WE MEASURE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GOVERNMENT?
I heard someone say that every person measures the effectiveness of government by their personal experience of it. I think there is considerable truth in this—provided we expand the meaning of “personal experience” beyond what happens to us individually.
Ask yourself:
Have you seen security improve in your area?
Have roads, water, healthcare, schools and other infrastructure actually improved where you live?
Do you personally know people who, despite having no powerful connections, have genuinely benefited from government programmes?
Do you know graduates or other ordinary citizens who applied through the proper channels, did not know a godfather, did not pay a bribe, and nevertheless obtained jobs, scholarships, contracts or other opportunities?
Do you know a poor person whose circumstances you understand who has received meaningful support—such as housing, business capital, education sponsorship or another opportunity that has genuinely changed their life?
These may be more convincing measures than simply being told that the economy is growing, billions have been spent, thousands of projects have been launched, or millions of people have benefited.
Government exists to improve people's lives. Therefore, its success should ultimately be visible in the lives of the people.
This does not mean every citizen must personally receive money or a government benefit before declaring a government successful. Rather, there should be visible, fairly distributed and verifiable improvements in our communities. Ordinary people should also be able to identify real beneficiaries whose success did not depend on political connections, corruption or privilege.
Conversely, if we have not benefited ourselves, and cannot identify people within our close circles and communities who have genuinely benefited, while government continues to report enormous achievements, it is reasonable to ... (Continued on comment)