10/06/2026
π₯ Light a careful burn or let a wildfire rip - Scotland's new tool can't tell the difference.
A report commissioned by NatureScot lays out a draft way of scoring peatland health. A lot of it is sensible: it ditches the rigid depth thresholds and looks instead at whether the bog still works as a living, connected system - the way the people who manage that ground already think.
Then it stumbles. The tool hands "burning" a single point of penalty and makes no distinction between a planned cool burn and a wildfire that's torn through a hillside. Same mark for both. The same mark, in fact, as an access track.
That number feeds straight into how much restoration a development on peat is made to fund. And it wasn't measured against real emissions - it was set by judgement, tested on synthetic scenarios. The authors call it a draft.
A Scottish tool for now. But the science behind it doesn't stop at the border.
Read the full article - link in the comments π