14/06/2026
This week was intense! We held a planning committee on Wednesday considering applications in Stansted and Birchanger for 480 houses. Recommended for approval by the officer, we stepped through the benefits and harms associated with the schemes and drew different conclusions regarding the weights for each.
As a consequence we resolved to refuse the applications on the grounds of conflict with the local plan spatial strategy/housing need and green belt. Under new rules from govt any applications for housing schemes over 150 have to be referred to the Secretary of State so we are now waiting and hoping our reasoning is accepted.
I was particularly touched by a resident’s summary of Wednesday’s committee (enclosed).
Planning can sometimes feel like a thankless task. Decisions are rarely straightforward, there are usually strong views on all sides, and whatever outcome is reached someone will be disappointed.
What residents don’t generally see is the amount of work that committee members put in beforehand to understand the issues and test the evidence for themselves. So it was genuinely nice to read a thoughtful reflection from someone who paid such close attention – not just to the decision itself, but to the role the committee plays in scrutinising recommendations and ensuring major decisions are properly tested in public. Thank you!
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DAiyucC59/?mibextid=wwXIfr
This was me outside offices earlier in the rain, after coming out of the planning meeting in which they voted on the ‘Stanhanger’ development.
I had to leave before the votes were taken on these applications, and I’d gone along because I had objected to them and was keen to see them discussed.
At this point I did not know the outcome - but a few things were going through my mind as I was standing there (aside from how heavy the rain was) - and I wanted to write about them.
Firstly, it struck me as I sat there in the council chamber that we are very lucky to live in a democracy. Sometimes we probably forget that. Members of the public were invited to speak and articulate their views and concerns. People were polite to each other. Councillors asked extremely robust questions and properly considered the arguments for and against. To me, it seemed that councillors were carefully weighing up the needs of all their constituents and giving voice to them.
There was no shoo-in or ‘already a done deal’; the debate and questions took a long time. And no matter what the outcome was, I felt grateful for that.
In the end, the committee voted unanimously to refuse the applications. And this is where I start talking about community.
Over the course of the last few months this neighbourhood and community has come together in the most incredible way. I’ve made new connections, and new friends. I’ve felt part of a team who really care about each other and the identity of where we live.
I know this decision isn’t great news for everyone and I respect other arguments. I know not everyone will agree with the outcome. But that’s not why I’m writing this.
I’m writing this because right now I’m grateful for those two things: democracy and community.