02/01/2025
I have been told in the past that Magistrates court is a Mickey mouse court.
I didn't know the magistrate court destroy all notes taken by the bench and the legal advisor once a trial finishes.
So no record what is said in court, apart from notes legal counsel take.
So if appealed witness can change evidence then it would be for counsel to highlight this and show, which then can can be dismissed by other counsel. no proof what was said before.
I will have this problem in January 2025 clearly the prosecution have tied to show no notes were taken but have been forced to admitts notes were. and a false statement made.
At the first trial the case would have been dismissed due to the breach of processes but lied to avoid this.
As some of you are aware Scambs council has taken legal action against me
Below is an email I have sent to lead barrister which was not responded to in the time scale given.
As the trial was part heard and a new date was set to hear the rest of the hearing,
When attending court I was told the magistrates were not the same ones and the court believed it was a new trial.
I was also told that all paper work had been destroyed from the original hearing by the court as they were under the impression the trial had finish.
I even questioned the typed notes made by court legal adviser again these are destroyed.
A new trial date has been fixed
Below is amended email for legal reasons I sent to Council lead barrister
They respond saying it will be dealt with at court at trial.
Email I sent.
(Lead Barrister) as you know you kindly suggested pre trial to work together to deal with this matter.
I clearly explain my concerns with regards SCDC past perjury in a previous court case against me by the council.
I asked yourself and the court to record matters of the hearing which you informed me you would do so and share which you have not done so I see this as a lie.
At the hearing on the 30/04/2024 you didn’t attend the court but instructed a fellow counsel to attend on your behalf.
During the trial (Council employee 1) gave clear strong evidence that notes of his visit with (Council employee2) on the 17th January 2022 was recorded in note form.
The judge clearly highlighted a breach of process which was very clear and was correct as information had not been disclosed me.
Your counsel lied to the court/judges saying that no notes were taken during the visit on the 17th January 2022 and thats the reason why they were not disclosed to me. Totally contradicting (Council employee 1) evidence.
Plenty of time was given to counsel before making such statement.
Further more (Council Employee 3) under took and submitted a further statement see attached.
Remembering (Council Employee 3) was not part of the trial on the day as counsel decided not to use them and didn’t disclose this at the time,(Council Employee 3) sat in court listening to the trial and after the trial took it on his self to check council note books records then confirming no notes were taken on this date by (Council Employee 2) to falsely trying to show and confirm that no notes were taken on the 17th January 2022 but didn’t check if any notes were taken by (Council employee1) who was giving evidence in court.
Which raise concerns why (Council Employee 1) notes on the day giving evidence were not checked by (Council Employee 3)!!!
I have since raised concerns why (Council Employee 3) only checked (Council employee2) notes but not (Council Employee 1) who was giving evidence
This has now been answered see attachment.
It states the following
SCDC reference Nov005 Date 08/11/24 Subject title ------------ statement 11th Jan 2024 cpn Recipient SPOC Response Thank you for your email.(Council employee 1) notes were not in question only (Council Employee 2) and therefore (Council Employee 3) statement refers to (Council Employee 2) notebook only. (Council employee 1) was in possession of his notebook at the time of writing his signed witness statement.
So clearly your Counsel lied to pervert the course of justice in lower court.
And as the lead barrister you would have been aware of the above?
This has only been disclosed due to myself questioning via the courts the legality of the council applying for a warrant which they are fiercely trying not to disclose to myself and allow the court to disclose to me.
I would have to question your Barristers Chambers integrity. And I intend to inform the bar standard board of the above.
I would like a full reply to this email by the end of the day 22ndNovember 2024
Regards
Des
